You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by David Baker <da...@mate1inc.com> on 2009/06/26 16:37:23 UTC
Upgrade to solr 1.4
Hi,
I need to upgrade from solr 1.3 to solr 1.4. I was wondering if there
is a particular revision of 1.4 that I should use that is considered
very stable for a production environment?
Re: Upgrade to solr 1.4
Posted by Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com>.
Solr in general is fairly stable in trunk. That isn't to say that a
critical error can't get through, because that does happen, but the
test suite is pretty comprehensive. With Solr 1.4 getting closer and
closer, I think you'll see the pace of change dropping off.
I think it's one of those things that you have to judge for
yourself.. Are the features/fixes/enhancements in 1.4 trunk worth a
potential risk? I assume that as part of deployment into production
you have some sort of defined criteria that says Solr can be added?
Testing of server capacity/performance etc? Those might tell you if
there are any issues with Solr 1.4 trunk that would need to delay your
deployment.
Eric
On Jun 26, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Julian Davchev wrote:
> David Baker wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to upgrade from solr 1.3 to solr 1.4. I was wondering if
>> there
>> is a particular revision of 1.4 that I should use that is considered
>> very stable for a production environment?
> Well it it's not pronounced stable and given in download page I don't
> think you can rely on being very stable for production environment.
-----------------------------------------------------
Eric Pugh | Principal | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com
Free/Busy: http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal
Re: Upgrade to solr 1.4
Posted by Jeff Newburn <jn...@zappos.com>.
We are using a trunk build from approximately the same time with little to
no issues including the new replication.
--
Jeff Newburn
Software Engineer, Zappos.com
jnewburn@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar <sh...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: <so...@lucene.apache.org>
> Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:21:44 +0530
> To: <so...@lucene.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Upgrade to solr 1.4
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Walter Underwood
> <wu...@netflix.com>wrote:
>
>> Netflix is running a nightly build from May in production. We did our
>> normal QA on it, then ran it on one of our five servers for two weeks.
>> No problems. It is handling about 10% more traffic with 10% less CPU.
>>
>
> Wow, that is good news! Are you also using the java based replication?
>
>
>>
>> We deployed 1.4 to all our servers yesterday.
>>
>
> Can you tell us which revision you used?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Upgrade to solr 1.4
Posted by Yonik Seeley <yo...@lucidimagination.com>.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:26 AM, kalidoss
<ka...@sifycorp.com> wrote:
> In version 1.3 EventDate field type is date, In 1.4 also its date But we are
> getting the following error.
Use the schema you had with 1.3 and it should work. The example
schemas are not backward compatible with an index built with the
previous version.
"date" in the 1.3 example schema mapped to DateField, but TrieDateField in 1.4.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Re: Upgrade to solr 1.4
Posted by kalidoss <ka...@sifycorp.com>.
In version 1.3 EventDate field type is date, In 1.4 also its date But we
are getting the following error.
<str
name="EventDate">ERROR:SCHEMA-INDEX-MISMATCH,stringValue=2008-05-16T07:19:28</str>
-kalidoss.m,
kalidoss wrote:
> Even i want to upgrade from v1.3 to 1.4
>
> I did 1.3 index directory replace with 1.4 and associated schema
> changes in that. Its throwing lot of exception like datatype mismatch
> with Integer, String, Date, etc. Even the results are coming with
> some error example: "<str
> name="Alias">ERROR:SCHEMA-INDEX-MISMATCH,stringValue=14903346</str>"
>
> Is there any tool/notes to upgrade from 1.3 to 1.4? on Data and schema
> data types etc?
>
> Please suggest us.
>
> -Kalidoss.m,
>
> Walter Underwood wrote:
>> We are using the script replication. I have no interest in spending time
>> configuring and QA'ing a different method when the scripts work fine.
>>
>> We are running the nightly from 2009-05-11.
>>
>> wunder
>>
>> On 6/26/09 8:51 AM, "Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <sh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Walter Underwood
>>> <wu...@netflix.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Netflix is running a nightly build from May in production. We did our
>>>> normal QA on it, then ran it on one of our five servers for two weeks.
>>>> No problems. It is handling about 10% more traffic with 10% less CPU.
>>> Wow, that is good news! Are you also using the java based replication?
>>>
>>>> We deployed 1.4 to all our servers yesterday.
>>> Can you tell us which revision you used?
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> Get your world in your inbox!
>
> Mail, widgets, documents, spreadsheets, organizer and much more with
> your Sifymail WIYI id!
> Log on to http://www.sify.com
>
> ********** DISCLAIMER **********
> Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to
> Sify Limited and is intended for use only by the individual or entity
> to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable
> law. If this is a forwarded message, the content of this E-MAIL may
> not have been sent with the authority of the Company. If you are not
> the intended recipient, an agent of the intended recipient or a
> person responsible for delivering the information to the named
> recipient, you are notified that any use, distribution, transmission,
> printing, copying or dissemination of this information in any way or
> in any manner is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please delete this mail & notify us
> immediately at admin@sifycorp.com
>
Re: Upgrade to solr 1.4
Posted by kalidoss <ka...@sifycorp.com>.
Even i want to upgrade from v1.3 to 1.4
I did 1.3 index directory replace with 1.4 and associated schema changes
in that. Its throwing lot of exception like datatype mismatch with
Integer, String, Date, etc. Even the results are coming with some error
example: "<str
name="Alias">ERROR:SCHEMA-INDEX-MISMATCH,stringValue=14903346</str>"
Is there any tool/notes to upgrade from 1.3 to 1.4? on Data and schema
data types etc?
Please suggest us.
-Kalidoss.m,
Walter Underwood wrote:
> We are using the script replication. I have no interest in spending time
> configuring and QA'ing a different method when the scripts work fine.
>
> We are running the nightly from 2009-05-11.
>
> wunder
>
> On 6/26/09 8:51 AM, "Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Walter Underwood
>> <wu...@netflix.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Netflix is running a nightly build from May in production. We did our
>>> normal QA on it, then ran it on one of our five servers for two weeks.
>>> No problems. It is handling about 10% more traffic with 10% less CPU.
>> Wow, that is good news! Are you also using the java based replication?
>>
>>> We deployed 1.4 to all our servers yesterday.
>> Can you tell us which revision you used?
>
>
Get your world in your inbox!
Mail, widgets, documents, spreadsheets, organizer and much more with your Sifymail WIYI id!
Log on to http://www.sify.com
********** DISCLAIMER **********
Information contained and transmitted by this E-MAIL is proprietary to
Sify Limited and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If this is a
forwarded message, the content of this E-MAIL may not have been sent with
the authority of the Company. If you are not the intended recipient, an
agent of the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering the
information to the named recipient, you are notified that any use,
distribution, transmission, printing, copying or dissemination of this
information in any way or in any manner is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please delete this mail & notify us
immediately at admin@sifycorp.com
Re: Upgrade to solr 1.4
Posted by Walter Underwood <wu...@netflix.com>.
We are using the script replication. I have no interest in spending time
configuring and QA'ing a different method when the scripts work fine.
We are running the nightly from 2009-05-11.
wunder
On 6/26/09 8:51 AM, "Shalin Shekhar Mangar" <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Walter Underwood
> <wu...@netflix.com>wrote:
>
>> Netflix is running a nightly build from May in production. We did our
>> normal QA on it, then ran it on one of our five servers for two weeks.
>> No problems. It is handling about 10% more traffic with 10% less CPU.
>
> Wow, that is good news! Are you also using the java based replication?
>
>> We deployed 1.4 to all our servers yesterday.
>
> Can you tell us which revision you used?
Re: Upgrade to solr 1.4
Posted by Shalin Shekhar Mangar <sh...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 9:11 PM, Walter Underwood <wu...@netflix.com>wrote:
> Netflix is running a nightly build from May in production. We did our
> normal QA on it, then ran it on one of our five servers for two weeks.
> No problems. It is handling about 10% more traffic with 10% less CPU.
>
Wow, that is good news! Are you also using the java based replication?
>
> We deployed 1.4 to all our servers yesterday.
>
Can you tell us which revision you used?
--
Regards,
Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Upgrade to solr 1.4
Posted by Walter Underwood <wu...@netflix.com>.
Netflix is running a nightly build from May in production. We did our
normal QA on it, then ran it on one of our five servers for two weeks.
No problems. It is handling about 10% more traffic with 10% less CPU.
We deployed 1.4 to all our servers yesterday.
wunder
On 6/26/09 7:58 AM, "Julian Davchev" <jm...@drun.net> wrote:
> David Baker wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need to upgrade from solr 1.3 to solr 1.4. I was wondering if there
>> is a particular revision of 1.4 that I should use that is considered
>> very stable for a production environment?
> Well it it's not pronounced stable and given in download page I don't
> think you can rely on being very stable for production environment.
Re: Upgrade to solr 1.4
Posted by Julian Davchev <jm...@drun.net>.
David Baker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to upgrade from solr 1.3 to solr 1.4. I was wondering if there
> is a particular revision of 1.4 that I should use that is considered
> very stable for a production environment?
Well it it's not pronounced stable and given in download page I don't
think you can rely on being very stable for production environment.