You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Shai Erera (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/05/07 15:20:49 UTC
[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-4039) Add AddIndexesTask to Benchmark
Shai Erera created LUCENE-4039:
----------------------------------
Summary: Add AddIndexesTask to Benchmark
Key: LUCENE-4039
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4039
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: modules/benchmark
Reporter: Shai Erera
Assignee: Shai Erera
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 4.0
I was interested in measuring the performance of IndexWriter.addIndexes(Directory) vs. IndexWriter.addIndexes(IndexReader). I wrote an AddIndexesTask and a matching .alg. The task takes a parameter whether to use the IndexReader or Directory variants. I'll upload the patch and describe the perf results.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-4039) Add AddIndexesTask to Benchmark
Posted by "Shai Erera (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13269604#comment-13269604 ]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-4039:
------------------------------------
I ran a small benchmark over an index with 1M documents, that was generated using that .alg file:
{code}
writer.version=LUCENE_40
ram.flush.mb=128
analyzer=org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.WhitespaceAnalyzer
directory=FSDirectory
work.dir=input
doc.stored=false
doc.tokenized=true
doc.term.vector=false
log.step=20000
content.source=org.apache.lucene.benchmark.byTask.feeds.SingleDocSource
task.max.depth.log=2
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ResetSystemErase
CreateIndex
[ { "AddDocs" AddDoc > : 125000 ] : 8
CloseIndex
RepSumByName
{code}
Then I ran the following addIndexes.alg file
{code}
writer.version=LUCENE_40
analyzer=org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardAnalyzer
directory=FSDirectory
work.dir=output
task.max.depth.log=2
# directory to add to the target index
addindexes.input.dir=input/index
# -----------------------------------------------------------------------
# call addIndexes (Directory)
ResetSystemErase
CreateIndex
{ "AddIndexesDirectory" AddIndexes(true) >
CloseIndex
# call addIndexes (IndexReader)
ResetSystemErase
CreateIndex
{ "AddIndexesReader" AddIndexes(false) >
CloseIndex
RepSumByPref AddIndexes
{code}
The run reports:
{code}
------------> Report Sum By Prefix (AddIndexes) (2 about 2 out of 7)
Operation round runCnt recsPerRun rec/s elapsedSec avgUsedMem avgTotalMem
AddIndexesDirectory 0 1 1 1.33 0.75 3,873,528 4,194,304
AddIndexesReader 0 1 1 0.06 17.82 5,795,936 7,906,304
{code}
To highlight, the addIndexes(Directory) version is x23 faster than addIndexes(IndexReader), and that's on a fairly small and simple index (376 MB, not so many posting lists). That means that on a more complex index, with more posting lists, more CPU encoding/decoding work will happen, while I suspect the raw file-system file copies done in addIndexes(Dir) will not be affected much.
This shows how important it is to use addIndexes(Dir) whenever possible ...
> Add AddIndexesTask to Benchmark
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4039
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4039
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: modules/benchmark
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Assignee: Shai Erera
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4039.patch
>
>
> I was interested in measuring the performance of IndexWriter.addIndexes(Directory) vs. IndexWriter.addIndexes(IndexReader). I wrote an AddIndexesTask and a matching .alg. The task takes a parameter whether to use the IndexReader or Directory variants. I'll upload the patch and describe the perf results.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-4039) Add AddIndexesTask to Benchmark
Posted by "Shai Erera (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-4039.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 1335363.
> Add AddIndexesTask to Benchmark
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4039
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4039
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: modules/benchmark
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Assignee: Shai Erera
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4039.patch
>
>
> I was interested in measuring the performance of IndexWriter.addIndexes(Directory) vs. IndexWriter.addIndexes(IndexReader). I wrote an AddIndexesTask and a matching .alg. The task takes a parameter whether to use the IndexReader or Directory variants. I'll upload the patch and describe the perf results.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-4039) Add AddIndexesTask to Benchmark
Posted by "Shai Erera (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-4039:
-------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-4039.patch
Patch adds AddIndexesTask (+Test) and an addIndexs.alg.
Because of how Benchmark works, the input directory can only be a location on the file system (and not e.g. RAMDirectory).
I haven't included yet PayloadProcessorProvider, I think it can be added separately.
> Add AddIndexesTask to Benchmark
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-4039
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-4039
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: modules/benchmark
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Assignee: Shai Erera
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-4039.patch
>
>
> I was interested in measuring the performance of IndexWriter.addIndexes(Directory) vs. IndexWriter.addIndexes(IndexReader). I wrote an AddIndexesTask and a matching .alg. The task takes a parameter whether to use the IndexReader or Directory variants. I'll upload the patch and describe the perf results.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org