You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by "Alexei Nekrassov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/07/09 14:07:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (FLINK-9784) Inconsistent use of 'static' in
AsyncIOExample.java
Alexei Nekrassov created FLINK-9784:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Inconsistent use of 'static' in AsyncIOExample.java
Key: FLINK-9784
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9784
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Examples
Affects Versions: 1.4.2, 1.5.0
Reporter: Alexei Nekrassov
In SampleAsyncFunction having _executorService_ and _random_ as static, but _counter_ as instance-specific will not work when someone creates a second instance of SampleAsyncFunction. In second SampleAsyncFunction the _counter_ will be 0 and we will re-intialize static _executorService_ and _random_, thus interfering with the first SampleAsyncFunction object.
To fix this example and make it clearer, make _executorService_ and _random_ instance-specific. That will make _counter_ redundant; also synchronization on class will no longer be needed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
Re: [jira] [Created] (FLINK-9784) Inconsistent use of 'static' in AsyncIOExample.java
Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.
I've assigned you.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 5:53 PM NEKRASSOV, ALEXEI <an...@att.com> wrote:
> In JIRA I don't see an option to assign this issue to myself. Can someone
> please assign?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexei Nekrassov (JIRA) [mailto:jira@apache.org]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2018 10:07 AM
> To: dev@flink.apache.org
> Subject: [jira] [Created] (FLINK-9784) Inconsistent use of 'static' in
> AsyncIOExample.java
>
> Alexei Nekrassov created FLINK-9784:
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Summary: Inconsistent use of 'static' in AsyncIOExample.java
> Key: FLINK-9784
> URL:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_FLINK-2D9784&d=DwICaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=aQRKg6d5fsz42zXkyiSdqg&m=Pbmeb7Zyk2Wn-mZsyPmOXap0vmNDg6VmS0WFzbSACsw&s=FP7Qbc18SSgRqKF72mtLVzT4jUVeEsBMc2BVAnhTCAA&e=
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Examples
> Affects Versions: 1.4.2, 1.5.0
> Reporter: Alexei Nekrassov
>
>
> In SampleAsyncFunction having _executorService_ and _random_ as static,
> but _counter_ as instance-specific will not work when someone creates a
> second instance of SampleAsyncFunction. In second SampleAsyncFunction the
> _counter_ will be 0 and we will re-intialize static _executorService_ and
> _random_, thus interfering with the first SampleAsyncFunction object.
>
> To fix this example and make it clearer, make _executorService_ and
> _random_ instance-specific. That will make _counter_ redundant; also
> synchronization on class will no longer be needed.
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
> (v7.6.3#76005)
>
RE: [jira] [Created] (FLINK-9784) Inconsistent use of 'static' in
AsyncIOExample.java
Posted by "NEKRASSOV, ALEXEI" <an...@att.com>.
In JIRA I don't see an option to assign this issue to myself. Can someone please assign?
Thanks,
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Alexei Nekrassov (JIRA) [mailto:jira@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2018 10:07 AM
To: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: [jira] [Created] (FLINK-9784) Inconsistent use of 'static' in AsyncIOExample.java
Alexei Nekrassov created FLINK-9784:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Inconsistent use of 'static' in AsyncIOExample.java
Key: FLINK-9784
URL: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_FLINK-2D9784&d=DwICaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=aQRKg6d5fsz42zXkyiSdqg&m=Pbmeb7Zyk2Wn-mZsyPmOXap0vmNDg6VmS0WFzbSACsw&s=FP7Qbc18SSgRqKF72mtLVzT4jUVeEsBMc2BVAnhTCAA&e=
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Examples
Affects Versions: 1.4.2, 1.5.0
Reporter: Alexei Nekrassov
In SampleAsyncFunction having _executorService_ and _random_ as static, but _counter_ as instance-specific will not work when someone creates a second instance of SampleAsyncFunction. In second SampleAsyncFunction the _counter_ will be 0 and we will re-intialize static _executorService_ and _random_, thus interfering with the first SampleAsyncFunction object.
To fix this example and make it clearer, make _executorService_ and _random_ instance-specific. That will make _counter_ redundant; also synchronization on class will no longer be needed.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)