You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@creadur.apache.org by Robert Burrell Donkin <rd...@apache.org> on 2013/03/31 14:59:03 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
The candidate staged at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-039/
(orgapachecreadur-039) is ready for review. Please download, check and
then cast your vote (see [1]).
Release votes are by majority approval. All are welcome and indeed
encouraged to vote, but only PMCers are binding on Apache. (See [2])
At least three binding +1's are required to promote this candidate to an
official Apache release.
I will tally this vote no earlier than 1500 Sunday April 7 UTC [3]
Robert
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
[2] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
[3] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20130407T15
--8<--------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 Release orgapachecreadur-039 as Apache Rat 0.9
[ ] +0 In favour of release but have not checked release
[ ] -0 Lean against release
[ ] -1 Do not release orgapachecreadur-039 as Apache Rat 0.9
--8<--------------------------------------------------
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@aiki-it.de>.
Am 31.03.2013 14:59, schrieb Robert Burrell Donkin:
> [ ] +0 In favour of release but have not checked release
+0
Happy easter and thanks for all your efforts!
Phil
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <rd...@apache.org>.
Here's my +1
On 03/31/13 13:59, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> --8<--------------------------------------------------
> [X] +1 Release orgapachecreadur-039 as Apache Rat 0.9
> [ ] +0 In favour of release but have not checked release
> [ ] -0 Lean against release
> [ ] -1 Do not release orgapachecreadur-039 as Apache Rat 0.9
> --8<--------------------------------------------------
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 04/02/13 05:31, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2013-03-31, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
>> The candidate staged at
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-039/
>> (orgapachecreadur-039) is ready for review. Please download, check and
>> then cast your vote (see [1]).
>
> Do you intend to move the distribution tarballs to www.apache.org/dev?
> Can't recall whether we are already using svnpubsub for releases.
>
> Personally I'm not fond of putting the tarballs into Maven central at
> all but haven't found a way to avoid it myself either (I usually remove
> them manually before closing the staging repository).
Sounds like a good plan
(For 0.10, I'd like to reconsider our distributions...)
Robert
Re: setting up builds to avoid putting tarballs into maven central
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
We have that same problem (avoiding putting tarballs into maven central). Our
current approach does the following:
1) We have specific projects (usually the top level one in multi-module setups)
that produce the assembly artifacts. These projects have a deploy configuration
override of <skip>true</skip> which prevents deployment of the tarballs.
2) Deploy is where normally the md5 and sha1 checksums are produced, so we add a
step for these projects to produce those, using the antrun pluging with the
"checksum" element.
You can see this here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/build/trunk/parent-pom/pom.xml
line# approx: 1200
Cheers. -Marshall
On 4/2/2013 12:31 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2013-03-31, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
>> The candidate staged at
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-039/
>> (orgapachecreadur-039) is ready for review. Please download, check and
>> then cast your vote (see [1]).
> Do you intend to move the distribution tarballs to www.apache.org/dev?
> Can't recall whether we are already using svnpubsub for releases.
>
> Personally I'm not fond of putting the tarballs into Maven central at
> all but haven't found a way to avoid it myself either (I usually remove
> them manually before closing the staging repository).
>
> Stefan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 04/03/13 05:17, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
<snip>
> OK, in this case I vote with a +1 conditional on that the tarballs are
> published via www.apache.org/dist - and I'd really like it if they were
> removed from the staging repository before promoting it.
Okay
Robert
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2013-04-08, sebb wrote:
> On 3 April 2013 05:17, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> OK, in this case I vote with a +1 conditional on that the tarballs are
>> published via www.apache.org/dist - and I'd really like it if they were
>> removed from the staging repository before promoting it.
> By tarballs, do you mean the tar.bz, tar.gz and .zip archives?
Yes.
The things that used to be called releases before people started to
think Maven Central was a release channel. :-)
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 3 April 2013 05:17, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2013-04-03, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 2 April 2013 05:31, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >> On 2013-03-31, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> >>> The candidate staged at
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-039/
> >>> (orgapachecreadur-039) is ready for review. Please download, check and
> >>> then cast your vote (see [1]).
>
> >> Do you intend to move the distribution tarballs to www.apache.org/dev?
> >> Can't recall whether we are already using svnpubsub for releases.
>
> >> Personally I'm not fond of putting the tarballs into Maven central at
> >> all but haven't found a way to avoid it myself either (I usually remove
> >> them manually before closing the staging repository).
>
> > They can also be deleted after the staging repo is closed.
> > So long as they are deleted before the staging repo is
> published/released,
> > they won't be sent to Maven central.
>
> > It can be convenient to use the Nexus staging repo for RC voting of
> > non-Maven archives as well as Maven jars etc.
>
> OK, in this case I vote with a +1 conditional on that the tarballs are
> published via www.apache.org/dist - and I'd really like it if they were
> removed from the staging repository before promoting it.
>
>
By tarballs, do you mean the tar.bz, tar.gz and .zip archives?
If so, I agree these should probably be deleted from Nexus before release -
but only after copying them to /dist/creadur (together with sigs/hashes)
> Stefan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2013-04-03, sebb wrote:
> On 2 April 2013 05:31, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 2013-03-31, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>>> The candidate staged at
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-039/
>>> (orgapachecreadur-039) is ready for review. Please download, check and
>>> then cast your vote (see [1]).
>> Do you intend to move the distribution tarballs to www.apache.org/dev?
>> Can't recall whether we are already using svnpubsub for releases.
>> Personally I'm not fond of putting the tarballs into Maven central at
>> all but haven't found a way to avoid it myself either (I usually remove
>> them manually before closing the staging repository).
> They can also be deleted after the staging repo is closed.
> So long as they are deleted before the staging repo is published/released,
> they won't be sent to Maven central.
> It can be convenient to use the Nexus staging repo for RC voting of
> non-Maven archives as well as Maven jars etc.
OK, in this case I vote with a +1 conditional on that the tarballs are
published via www.apache.org/dist - and I'd really like it if they were
removed from the staging repository before promoting it.
Stefan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <rd...@apache.org>.
On 04/03/13 20:37, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> I'm +1 for publishing the site as it is. No problems with such small
> archives going to Maven Central.
(Just for the record) are you still +1 if I publish the tar-balls to
www.apache.org/dist (as Stefan asks) ...?
Robert
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
I'm +1 for publishing the site as it is. No problems with such small
archives going to Maven Central.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 2:39 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2 April 2013 05:31, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On 2013-03-31, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> >
> > > The candidate staged at
> > >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-039/
> > > (orgapachecreadur-039) is ready for review. Please download, check and
> > > then cast your vote (see [1]).
> >
> > Do you intend to move the distribution tarballs to www.apache.org/dev?
> > Can't recall whether we are already using svnpubsub for releases.
> >
> > Personally I'm not fond of putting the tarballs into Maven central at
> > all but haven't found a way to avoid it myself either (I usually remove
> > them manually before closing the staging repository).
> >
>
> They can also be deleted after the staging repo is closed.
> So long as they are deleted before the staging repo is published/released,
> they won't be sent to Maven central.
>
> It can be convenient to use the Nexus staging repo for RC voting of
> non-Maven archives as well as Maven jars etc.
>
> Stefan
> >
>
--
"That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make friends
with the bully!"
Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 2 April 2013 05:31, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2013-03-31, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> > The candidate staged at
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-039/
> > (orgapachecreadur-039) is ready for review. Please download, check and
> > then cast your vote (see [1]).
>
> Do you intend to move the distribution tarballs to www.apache.org/dev?
> Can't recall whether we are already using svnpubsub for releases.
>
> Personally I'm not fond of putting the tarballs into Maven central at
> all but haven't found a way to avoid it myself either (I usually remove
> them manually before closing the staging repository).
>
They can also be deleted after the staging repo is closed.
So long as they are deleted before the staging repo is published/released,
they won't be sent to Maven central.
It can be convenient to use the Nexus staging repo for RC voting of
non-Maven archives as well as Maven jars etc.
Stefan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2013-03-31, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> The candidate staged at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-039/
> (orgapachecreadur-039) is ready for review. Please download, check and
> then cast your vote (see [1]).
Do you intend to move the distribution tarballs to www.apache.org/dev?
Can't recall whether we are already using svnpubsub for releases.
Personally I'm not fond of putting the tarballs into Maven central at
all but haven't found a way to avoid it myself either (I usually remove
them manually before closing the staging repository).
Stefan
Re: distribution directory [WAS [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Rat
0.9]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 04/23/13 22:02, sebb wrote:
<snip>
> I think I have karma to create the directory, but there are other stages
> that are needed for which I probably don't have karma/knowledge.
> For example, the SVN messages need to be sent to the appropriate TLP
> mailing list. Please add that info to the JIRA.
> If Creadur wants t have a dist staging area -
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/creadur<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/creadur>-
> probably best to mention that as well.
Thanks for jumping in :-)
I've edit the description to include a request for a staging area as
well as commits@creadur.apache.org (I'm unsure whether
dev@creadur.apache.org would be better)
Robert
>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6194<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6194>
Re: [WAS [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9]
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 23 April 2013 20:04, Robert Burrell Donkin <
robertburrelldonkin@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 04/21/13 21:19, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> I've deleted the tarballs then promoted orgapachecreadur-039. This is
>> the first release for Creadur, so I'll need to pick up the graduation
>> tasks associated with the first release and set up distribution
>> directories next...
>>
>
> The distribution directory hasn't been created yet[1] and I lack the
> required karma. I've opened an INFRA[2] but if anyone has any tips, please
> jump in :-)
>
>
I think I have karma to create the directory, but there are other stages
that are needed for which I probably don't have karma/knowledge.
For example, the SVN messages need to be sent to the appropriate TLP
mailing list. Please add that info to the JIRA.
If Creadur wants t have a dist staging area -
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/creadur<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/creadur>-
probably best to mention that as well.
Robert
> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/**release-publishing.html#**
> distribution_dist<http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#distribution_dist>
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6194<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6194>
>
[WAS [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9]
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 04/21/13 21:19, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
<snip>
> I've deleted the tarballs then promoted orgapachecreadur-039. This is
> the first release for Creadur, so I'll need to pick up the graduation
> tasks associated with the first release and set up distribution
> directories next...
The distribution directory hasn't been created yet[1] and I lack the
required karma. I've opened an INFRA[2] but if anyone has any tips,
please jump in :-)
Robert
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-publishing.html#distribution_dist
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6194
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>.
On 04/17/13 20:15, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
<snip>
> Given that I do not distribute the tarballs through Maven Central, I count:
>
> +0 Phil Ottlinger (non-binding)
> +1 Stefan Bodewig (binding)
> +1 Robert Burrell Donkin (binding)
> +1 Jochen Wiedmann (binding)
>
> By my count, this approves orgapachecreadur-039 for promotion.
I've deleted the tarballs then promoted orgapachecreadur-039. This is
the first release for Creadur, so I'll need to pick up the graduation
tasks associated with the first release and set up distribution
directories next...
Robert
[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Rat 0.9
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <rd...@apache.org>.
On 03/31/13 13:59, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> The candidate staged at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecreadur-039/
> (orgapachecreadur-039) is ready for review. Please download, check and
> then cast your vote (see [1]).
>
> Release votes are by majority approval. All are welcome and indeed
> encouraged to vote, but only PMCers are binding on Apache. (See [2])
>
> At least three binding +1's are required to promote this candidate to an
> official Apache release.
I'm going to tally this VOTE now. It's been a little messy so please
jump in and correct any mistakes I've made...
Given that I do not distribute the tarballs through Maven Central, I count:
+0 Phil Ottlinger (non-binding)
+1 Stefan Bodewig (binding)
+1 Robert Burrell Donkin (binding)
+1 Jochen Wiedmann (binding)
By my count, this approves orgapachecreadur-039 for promotion. If anyone
has any objections or questions, please jump in before Saturday.
Robert