You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Alan Woodward (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/09/03 12:45:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (LUCENE-8477) Improve handling of inner disjunctions in intervals

Alan Woodward created LUCENE-8477:
-------------------------------------

             Summary: Improve handling of inner disjunctions in intervals
                 Key: LUCENE-8477
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8477
             Project: Lucene - Core
          Issue Type: New Feature
            Reporter: Alan Woodward


The current implementation of the disjunction interval produced by {{Intervals.or}} is a direct implementation of the OR operator from the Vigna paper.  This produces minimal intervals, meaning that (a) is preferred over (a b), and (b) also over (a b).  This has advantages when it comes to counting intervals for scoring, but also has drawbacks when it comes to matching.  For example, a phrase query for ((a OR (a b)) NEAR (c)) will not match the document (a b c), because (a) will be preferred over (a b), and (a c) does not match.

This ticket is to discuss the best way of dealing with disjunctions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org