You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to sysadmins@spamassassin.apache.org by Bryan Vest <mu...@gmail.com> on 2017/06/12 12:54:32 UTC
bugzilla canconfirm Can confirm a bug.
I only seem to have the bugzilla permission "canconfirm Can confirm a bug".
Should I have different permissions?
Just making sure everything is like it should be. My login there is
bvest@apache.org.
--Bryan
Re: bugzilla canconfirm Can confirm a bug.
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <ke...@mcgrail.com>.
There is no set level of permissions per se.
Would you like the keys to the castle?
On 6/12/2017 8:54 AM, Bryan Vest wrote:
> I only seem to have the bugzilla permission "canconfirm Can confirm a bug".
> Should I have different permissions?
>
> Just making sure everything is like it should be. My login there is
> bvest@apache.org.
>
> --Bryan
>
Re: bugzilla canconfirm Can confirm a bug.
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <ke...@mcgrail.com>.
On 6/12/2017 2:50 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> I am fine with leaving the existing perms to be all or nothing. No
> need to make more work if it's not necessary. My comment was more
> toward the "take" link/option should be available to all accounts by
> default. I guess BZ wasn't setup that way.
You might just know more about BZ than others on the project. Feel free
to discuss on dev@team and if you get lazy consensus, then JDI.
For example, what I mean is:
"Hey guys, I think it would be helpful to make this change in bugzilla
to do X so we can do Y. Let me know if you disagree or have comments
otherwise I'll make the change <in a week, usually no less than 72 hours>"
This would come under the concept of lazy consensus.
Best,
KAM
Re: bugzilla canconfirm Can confirm a bug.
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <ke...@mcgrail.com>.
On 6/12/2017 3:14 PM, Bryan Vest wrote:
> I already have the keys to start the engine, might as well give me the keys
> to the that castle too.:)
Done!
Re: bugzilla canconfirm Can confirm a bug.
Posted by Bryan Vest <mu...@gmail.com>.
Most of my bug/ticket terminology comes from work. Tickets are
auto-assigned to a department but not a person. Generally it is whoever is
free will work that ticket will start working on it so we have to click
"Take Ownership" to take become the owner of that ticket then work it till
the end. It is a modified Kayako system if anyone has used that system in
the past.
I already have the keys to start the engine, might as well give me the keys
to the that castle too. :)
--Bryan Vest
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 2:50 PM, Dave Jones <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> I am fine with leaving the existing perms to be all or nothing. No need
> to make more work if it's not necessary. My comment was more toward the
> "take" link/option should be available to all accounts by default. I guess
> BZ wasn't setup that way.
>
>
>
> On 06/12/2017 01:43 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
>> Never really thought about it much. Most of the project committees just
>> ask and get everything.
>>
>> If you want less than everything I can send you a list and you can tell
>> me which you want.
>> Regards,
>> KAM
>>
>> On June 12, 2017 2:28:16 PM EDT, Dave Jones <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Really? I would think that anyone would be allowed to "take" a bug
>> without needing "keys to the castle."
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> On 06/12/2017 07:54 AM, Bryan Vest wrote:
>>
>> I only seem to have the bugzilla permission "canconfirm Can
>> confirm a bug".
>> Should I have different permissions?
>>
>> Just making sure everything is like it should be. My login there
>> is
>> bvest@apache.org.
>>
>> --Bryan
>>
>>
>
Re: bugzilla canconfirm Can confirm a bug.
Posted by Dave Jones <da...@apache.org>.
I am fine with leaving the existing perms to be all or nothing. No need
to make more work if it's not necessary. My comment was more toward the
"take" link/option should be available to all accounts by default. I
guess BZ wasn't setup that way.
On 06/12/2017 01:43 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> Never really thought about it much. Most of the project committees just
> ask and get everything.
>
> If you want less than everything I can send you a list and you can tell
> me which you want.
> Regards,
> KAM
>
> On June 12, 2017 2:28:16 PM EDT, Dave Jones <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Really? I would think that anyone would be allowed to "take" a bug
> without needing "keys to the castle."
>
> Dave
>
> On 06/12/2017 07:54 AM, Bryan Vest wrote:
>
> I only seem to have the bugzilla permission "canconfirm Can
> confirm a bug".
> Should I have different permissions?
>
> Just making sure everything is like it should be. My login there is
> bvest@apache.org.
>
> --Bryan
>
Re: bugzilla canconfirm Can confirm a bug.
Posted by "Kevin A. McGrail" <ke...@mcgrail.com>.
Never really thought about it much. Most of the project committees just ask and get everything.
If you want less than everything I can send you a list and you can tell me which you want.
Regards,
KAM
On June 12, 2017 2:28:16 PM EDT, Dave Jones <da...@apache.org> wrote:
>Really? I would think that anyone would be allowed to "take" a bug
>without needing "keys to the castle."
>
>Dave
>
>On 06/12/2017 07:54 AM, Bryan Vest wrote:
>> I only seem to have the bugzilla permission "canconfirm Can confirm a
>bug".
>> Should I have different permissions?
>>
>> Just making sure everything is like it should be. My login there is
>> bvest@apache.org.
>>
>> --Bryan
>>
Re: bugzilla canconfirm Can confirm a bug.
Posted by Dave Jones <da...@apache.org>.
Really? I would think that anyone would be allowed to "take" a bug
without needing "keys to the castle."
Dave
On 06/12/2017 07:54 AM, Bryan Vest wrote:
> I only seem to have the bugzilla permission "canconfirm Can confirm a bug".
> Should I have different permissions?
>
> Just making sure everything is like it should be. My login there is
> bvest@apache.org.
>
> --Bryan
>