You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bloodhound.apache.org by Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com> on 2012/08/07 01:07:09 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Hi,
I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first release
Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from the IPMC
members Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
The result of the vote is summarised here:
http://markmail.org/message/i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6
The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and KEYS
can be found here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
The release itself is created from:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.1
(r1362530)
Issues identified by Greg and Hyrum to be fixed for the next release are
listed here:
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after
11pm UTC on Thursday 9th August.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
[ ] +0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
Cheers,
Gary
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.martin@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 August 2012 8:37 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first release
Apache
> Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
> Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from the IPMC
> members Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
>
> The result of the vote is summarised here:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6
>
> The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and KEYS
can
> be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
>
> The release itself is created from:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.1
> (r1362530)
>
> Issues identified by Greg and Hyrum to be fixed for the next release are
> listed here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm
> UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>
[ X] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
Gav...
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org>.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2012 7:07 PM, "Gary Martin" <ga...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>>...
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm
> UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
>
> Repeating my prior IPMC binding vote:
>
> +1 to release
Same. +1 (binding)
-Hyrum
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org>.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Aug 6, 2012 7:07 PM, "Gary Martin" <ga...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>>...
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm
> UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
>
> Repeating my prior IPMC binding vote:
>
> +1 to release
Same. +1 (binding)
-Hyrum
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
On Aug 6, 2012 7:07 PM, "Gary Martin" <ga...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>...
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm
UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
Repeating my prior IPMC binding vote:
+1 to release
Cheers,
-g
Re: Finalising release Was: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound
0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com>.
On 08/10/2012 12:33 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Just move the files. No rename. Don't over think it. You've seen the votes.
> Get the release completed.
Good.. that is what I thought.
> Jira is having trouble, so email infrastructure@ once you've moved the
> files.
Excellent, as you can see I just did that. I remember trying to
subscribe to that list but I have not been successful. Perhaps that is
on purpose of course.
>
> Cheers,
> -g
> On Aug 10, 2012 5:32 AM, "Gary Martin" <ga...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Right, I should have discussed this last night but I was a little tired.
>>
>> All that is left to do is to copy or move the release files from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/>to
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/release/incubator/**bloodhound/<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/bloodhound/>and then inform INFRA through
>> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-5057<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5057>(jira appears down to me at the moment though)
>>
>> I guess that as I have already created the files as
>> apache-bloodhound-incubating-**0.1.0-RC1.* I should leave them like this
>> and not worry too much about how that is interpreted. I suspect it could
>> take a while for Infra to be able to react so I will get on with this very
>> soon.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On 08/10/2012 01:08 AM, Gary Martin wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry.. I appeared to forget to change the subject to reflect the vote
>>> ending.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> On 10/08/12 01:07, Gary Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> So, it looks like we have already passed the 72 hour point and I am
>>>> pleased to note that we also appear to have a result.
>>>>
>>>> All IPMC binding votes from the bloodhound-dev part of the poll were
>>>> repeated here and so the results are:
>>>>
>>>> Gavin McDonald (binding) +1
>>>> Greg Stein (binding) +1
>>>> Hyrum Wright (binding) +1
>>>>
>>>> With 3 +1s I understand that release of Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
>>>> (incubating) is approved. I will complete the process by moving the
>>>> artefacts from Bloodhound's /dist/dev area to the equivalent /dist/release
>>>> area in the morning.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks to all those who took part.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 07/08/12 00:07, Gary Martin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first release
>>>>> Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
>>>>> Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from the IPMC members
>>>>> Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
>>>>>
>>>>> The result of the vote is summarised here:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://markmail.org/message/**i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6<http://markmail.org/message/i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6>
>>>>>
>>>>> The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and
>>>>> KEYS can be found here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/>
>>>>>
>>>>> The release itself is created from:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/bloodhound/**
>>>>> branches/0.1<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.1>
>>>>> (r1362530)
>>>>>
>>>>> Issues identified by Greg and Hyrum to be fixed for the next release
>>>>> are listed here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/**bloodhound/ticket/153<https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after
>>>>> 11pm UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
>>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Gary Martin
>>>> gary.martin@wandisco.com
>>>> gjm@apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gary Martin
>>> gary.martin@wandisco.com
>>> gjm@apache.org
>>>
>>
Re: Finalising release Was: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache
Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
Just move the files. No rename. Don't over think it. You've seen the votes.
Get the release completed.
Jira is having trouble, so email infrastructure@ once you've moved the
files.
Cheers,
-g
On Aug 10, 2012 5:32 AM, "Gary Martin" <ga...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> Right, I should have discussed this last night but I was a little tired.
>
> All that is left to do is to copy or move the release files from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/>to
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/release/incubator/**bloodhound/<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/bloodhound/>and then inform INFRA through
> https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-5057<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5057>(jira appears down to me at the moment though)
>
> I guess that as I have already created the files as
> apache-bloodhound-incubating-**0.1.0-RC1.* I should leave them like this
> and not worry too much about how that is interpreted. I suspect it could
> take a while for Infra to be able to react so I will get on with this very
> soon.
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
>
>
> On 08/10/2012 01:08 AM, Gary Martin wrote:
>
>> Sorry.. I appeared to forget to change the subject to reflect the vote
>> ending.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gary
>>
>> On 10/08/12 01:07, Gary Martin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> So, it looks like we have already passed the 72 hour point and I am
>>> pleased to note that we also appear to have a result.
>>>
>>> All IPMC binding votes from the bloodhound-dev part of the poll were
>>> repeated here and so the results are:
>>>
>>> Gavin McDonald (binding) +1
>>> Greg Stein (binding) +1
>>> Hyrum Wright (binding) +1
>>>
>>> With 3 +1s I understand that release of Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
>>> (incubating) is approved. I will complete the process by moving the
>>> artefacts from Bloodhound's /dist/dev area to the equivalent /dist/release
>>> area in the morning.
>>>
>>> Thanks to all those who took part.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/08/12 00:07, Gary Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first release
>>>> Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
>>>> Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from the IPMC members
>>>> Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
>>>>
>>>> The result of the vote is summarised here:
>>>>
>>>> http://markmail.org/message/**i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6<http://markmail.org/message/i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6>
>>>>
>>>> The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and
>>>> KEYS can be found here:
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/**dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/<https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/>
>>>>
>>>> The release itself is created from:
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/incubator/bloodhound/**
>>>> branches/0.1<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.1>
>>>> (r1362530)
>>>>
>>>> Issues identified by Greg and Hyrum to be fixed for the next release
>>>> are listed here:
>>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/**bloodhound/ticket/153<https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after
>>>> 11pm UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
>>>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gary Martin
>>> gary.martin@wandisco.com
>>> gjm@apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gary Martin
>> gary.martin@wandisco.com
>> gjm@apache.org
>>
>
>
Finalising release Was: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound
0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com>.
Right, I should have discussed this last night but I was a little tired.
All that is left to do is to copy or move the release files from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/ to
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/bloodhound/ and
then inform INFRA through
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5057 (jira appears down to
me at the moment though)
I guess that as I have already created the files as
apache-bloodhound-incubating-0.1.0-RC1.* I should leave them like this
and not worry too much about how that is interpreted. I suspect it could
take a while for Infra to be able to react so I will get on with this
very soon.
Cheers,
Gary
On 08/10/2012 01:08 AM, Gary Martin wrote:
> Sorry.. I appeared to forget to change the subject to reflect the vote
> ending.
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
>
> On 10/08/12 01:07, Gary Martin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So, it looks like we have already passed the 72 hour point and I am
>> pleased to note that we also appear to have a result.
>>
>> All IPMC binding votes from the bloodhound-dev part of the poll were
>> repeated here and so the results are:
>>
>> Gavin McDonald (binding) +1
>> Greg Stein (binding) +1
>> Hyrum Wright (binding) +1
>>
>> With 3 +1s I understand that release of Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
>> (incubating) is approved. I will complete the process by moving the
>> artefacts from Bloodhound's /dist/dev area to the equivalent
>> /dist/release area in the morning.
>>
>> Thanks to all those who took part.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On 07/08/12 00:07, Gary Martin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first
>>> release Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful
>>> vote by the Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from
>>> the IPMC members Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
>>>
>>> The result of the vote is summarised here:
>>>
>>> http://markmail.org/message/i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6
>>>
>>> The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and
>>> KEYS can be found here:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
>>>
>>> The release itself is created from:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.1
>>> (r1362530)
>>>
>>> Issues identified by Greg and Hyrum to be fixed for the next release
>>> are listed here:
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153
>>>
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after
>>> 11pm UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
>>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Gary
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gary Martin
>> gary.martin@wandisco.com
>> gjm@apache.org
>
>
> --
> Gary Martin
> gary.martin@wandisco.com
> gjm@apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com>.
Sorry.. I appeared to forget to change the subject to reflect the vote
ending.
Cheers,
Gary
On 10/08/12 01:07, Gary Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, it looks like we have already passed the 72 hour point and I am
> pleased to note that we also appear to have a result.
>
> All IPMC binding votes from the bloodhound-dev part of the poll were
> repeated here and so the results are:
>
> Gavin McDonald (binding) +1
> Greg Stein (binding) +1
> Hyrum Wright (binding) +1
>
> With 3 +1s I understand that release of Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
> (incubating) is approved. I will complete the process by moving the
> artefacts from Bloodhound's /dist/dev area to the equivalent
> /dist/release area in the morning.
>
> Thanks to all those who took part.
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
>
>
> On 07/08/12 00:07, Gary Martin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first
>> release Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful
>> vote by the Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from
>> the IPMC members Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
>>
>> The result of the vote is summarised here:
>>
>> http://markmail.org/message/i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6
>>
>> The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and
>> KEYS can be found here:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
>>
>> The release itself is created from:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.1 (r1362530)
>>
>> Issues identified by Greg and Hyrum to be fixed for the next release
>> are listed here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153
>>
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after
>> 11pm UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gary
>
>
> --
> Gary Martin
> gary.martin@wandisco.com
> gjm@apache.org
--
Gary Martin
gary.martin@wandisco.com
gjm@apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com>.
Sorry.. I appeared to forget to change the subject to reflect the vote
ending.
Cheers,
Gary
On 10/08/12 01:07, Gary Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, it looks like we have already passed the 72 hour point and I am
> pleased to note that we also appear to have a result.
>
> All IPMC binding votes from the bloodhound-dev part of the poll were
> repeated here and so the results are:
>
> Gavin McDonald (binding) +1
> Greg Stein (binding) +1
> Hyrum Wright (binding) +1
>
> With 3 +1s I understand that release of Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
> (incubating) is approved. I will complete the process by moving the
> artefacts from Bloodhound's /dist/dev area to the equivalent
> /dist/release area in the morning.
>
> Thanks to all those who took part.
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
>
>
> On 07/08/12 00:07, Gary Martin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first
>> release Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful
>> vote by the Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from
>> the IPMC members Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
>>
>> The result of the vote is summarised here:
>>
>> http://markmail.org/message/i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6
>>
>> The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and
>> KEYS can be found here:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
>>
>> The release itself is created from:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.1 (r1362530)
>>
>> Issues identified by Greg and Hyrum to be fixed for the next release
>> are listed here:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153
>>
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after
>> 11pm UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
>> [ ] +0 Don't care
>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gary
>
>
> --
> Gary Martin
> gary.martin@wandisco.com
> gjm@apache.org
--
Gary Martin
gary.martin@wandisco.com
gjm@apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com>.
Hi,
So, it looks like we have already passed the 72 hour point and I am
pleased to note that we also appear to have a result.
All IPMC binding votes from the bloodhound-dev part of the poll were
repeated here and so the results are:
Gavin McDonald (binding) +1
Greg Stein (binding) +1
Hyrum Wright (binding) +1
With 3 +1s I understand that release of Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
(incubating) is approved. I will complete the process by moving the
artefacts from Bloodhound's /dist/dev area to the equivalent
/dist/release area in the morning.
Thanks to all those who took part.
Cheers,
Gary
On 07/08/12 00:07, Gary Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first
> release Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful
> vote by the Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from
> the IPMC members Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
>
> The result of the vote is summarised here:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6
>
> The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and
> KEYS can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
>
> The release itself is created from:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.1
> (r1362530)
>
> Issues identified by Greg and Hyrum to be fixed for the next release
> are listed here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after
> 11pm UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
--
Gary Martin
gary.martin@wandisco.com
gjm@apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com>.
Hi,
So, it looks like we have already passed the 72 hour point and I am
pleased to note that we also appear to have a result.
All IPMC binding votes from the bloodhound-dev part of the poll were
repeated here and so the results are:
Gavin McDonald (binding) +1
Greg Stein (binding) +1
Hyrum Wright (binding) +1
With 3 +1s I understand that release of Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
(incubating) is approved. I will complete the process by moving the
artefacts from Bloodhound's /dist/dev area to the equivalent
/dist/release area in the morning.
Thanks to all those who took part.
Cheers,
Gary
On 07/08/12 00:07, Gary Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first
> release Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful
> vote by the Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from
> the IPMC members Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
>
> The result of the vote is summarised here:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6
>
> The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and
> KEYS can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
>
> The release itself is created from:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.1
> (r1362530)
>
> Issues identified by Greg and Hyrum to be fixed for the next release
> are listed here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after
> 11pm UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
--
Gary Martin
gary.martin@wandisco.com
gjm@apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
On Aug 6, 2012 7:07 PM, "Gary Martin" <ga...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>...
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm
UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
Repeating my prior IPMC binding vote:
+1 to release
Cheers,
-g
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@e-reka.si>.
On 07.08.2012 01:07, Gary Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first
> release Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful
> vote by the Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from
> the IPMC members Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
>
> The result of the vote is summarised here:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6
>
> The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and
> KEYS can be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
>
> The release itself is created from:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.1
> (r1362530)
>
> Issues identified by Greg and Hyrum to be fixed for the next release
> are listed here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after
> 11pm UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
+1 for release.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Gavin McDonald <ga...@16degrees.com.au>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Martin [mailto:gary.martin@wandisco.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 7 August 2012 8:37 AM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: bloodhound-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first release
Apache
> Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
> Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from the IPMC
> members Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
>
> The result of the vote is summarised here:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6
>
> The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and KEYS
can
> be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
>
> The release itself is created from:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.1
> (r1362530)
>
> Issues identified by Greg and Hyrum to be fixed for the next release are
> listed here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm
> UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>
[ X] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
Gav...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
[branching a discuss thread]
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As I replied to Marvin, Apache Roller had a hard dependency on
> Hibernate for some of its incubator releases. Allowing that was okay'd
> by the IPMC, VP Legal, and the Board :-)
>
> My view is that these are not true ASF projects, so *some* wiggle is
> allowable, especially with a plan in hand.
Note that even though podlings aren't full Apache projects yet,
incubating releases *are* official Apache releases, and should
therefore be held to a similar standard. If that standard can't easily
be reached, some podlings (like Subversion when it came in) have opted
to keep cutting non-Apache releases outside the ASF until those issues
have been resolved.
> It's certainly a subjective judgement call. I don't know where to draw
> the line, nor whether we must draw it. One of those "know it when you
> see it" things. And we have the judgement of a large body of people
> here on this list.
Personally I'm fine with things like missing license headers or
partially incomplete license metadata (which sounds like is the case
here), as long as those are just omissions that don't fundamentally
affect our rights (or those of downstream users) to distribute the
releases and as long as there's a commitment to fix such issues in
time for the next release. Such minor issues are fairly common also in
many TLPs (I've filed a number of related bugs), so it's not even a
problem that's limited just to the Incubator.
Larger issues like exceptions to documented licensing policy (like in
the examples brought up here) should always be explicitly cleared with
legal, etc.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:38 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...
> Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies
> in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't
> recall any releases like that.
As I replied to Marvin, Apache Roller had a hard dependency on
Hibernate for some of its incubator releases. Allowing that was okay'd
by the IPMC, VP Legal, and the Board :-)
My view is that these are not true ASF projects, so *some* wiggle is
allowable, especially with a plan in hand.
(now, I still would not advocate for any release that seriously broke
the rules; at a minimum, get LICENSE/NOTICE and source file headers in
there; work on clarifying your dependencies and their licenses; etc)
> Anyway thats beside the point, ok so lets have this be a precedent
> that sets Incubator policy - we now have some wiggle room while
> incubating to do a release that violates ASF release policy as long as
> it will be fixed soon in another release and definitely before
> graduating. A policy like that would help a lot with avoiding the
> numerous respins some poddling releases are made to do during voting
> on general@.
Exactly. We've seen a lot of back/forth which doesn't really help the
podling very much.
It's certainly a subjective judgement call. I don't know where to draw
the line, nor whether we must draw it. One of those "know it when you
see it" things. And we have the judgement of a large body of people
here on this list.
Cheers,
-g
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Let me add one more point on adding dependencies to source releases.
> In addition to license, the dependence contain copyright statements,
> e.g. "# Copyright (C) 2005 Christopher Lenz <cm...@gmx.de>".
>
> As mentioned here http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
>> If the source file is submitted with a copyright notice included in it, the copyright owner (or owner's agent) must either:
>> remove such notices, or
>> move them to the NOTICE file associated with each applicable project release, or
>> provide written permission for the ASF to make such removal or relocation of the notices.
>
> This issue cannot be fixed by merging licenses into LICENSE file.
>
No, this is not what that source headers page is talking about. That
page is talking about any copyright statements that may have been in
source files when contributed to the ASF, here we are talking about
the licenses of any external dependencies that are included in a
release, and those licenses should be added to the LICENSE file, as
described at: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
Let me add one more point on adding dependencies to source releases.
In addition to license, the dependence contain copyright statements,
e.g. "# Copyright (C) 2005 Christopher Lenz <cm...@gmx.de>".
As mentioned here http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
> If the source file is submitted with a copyright notice included in it, the copyright owner (or owner's agent) must either:
> remove such notices, or
> move them to the NOTICE file associated with each applicable project release, or
> provide written permission for the ASF to make such removal or relocation of the notices.
This issue cannot be fixed by merging licenses into LICENSE file.
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:26 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>...
>>>> You can look at the archives back in 2006 when it was incubating. In
>>>> particular, there is one sent to private@incubator that I would refer
>>>> you to:
>>>> http://s.apache.org/c04 [only usable by ASF Members]
>>>>
>>>
>>> Didn't that get subsequently revised by Cliff et al into "Incubating
>>> projects must not distribute an official product release that includes
>>> works covered by an excluded license" -
>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition-incubator
>>
>> Dunno. That link is for a draft document, and has been replaced by a
>> final/resolved form (see link at top of page).
>>
>> Regardless... Jukka posted recently, and I'd look to his note for
>> "current policy". I think his statement puts Incubator policy a little
>> more relaxed than ASF, but likely not as relaxed as I would have
>> posited (in regards to dependencies).
>>
>
> The good thing about release votes is that they can't be vetoed so
> regardless of what policies may or may not be documented whether or
> not a release vote passes is just down to getting enough people to
> vote +1. Votes on general@ often stall and require a respin when
> someone claims something is wrong which puts off others from voting.
> Something as basic as a dependent license missing from the LICENSE
> file would be one of those things that in the past would have always
> demanded a respin, so the change, and it is a change, to allow wiggle
> room is what i hope people will remember from this.
>
> ...ant
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>...
>>> You can look at the archives back in 2006 when it was incubating. In
>>> particular, there is one sent to private@incubator that I would refer
>>> you to:
>>> http://s.apache.org/c04 [only usable by ASF Members]
>>>
>>
>> Didn't that get subsequently revised by Cliff et al into "Incubating
>> projects must not distribute an official product release that includes
>> works covered by an excluded license" -
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition-incubator
>
> Dunno. That link is for a draft document, and has been replaced by a
> final/resolved form (see link at top of page).
>
> Regardless... Jukka posted recently, and I'd look to his note for
> "current policy". I think his statement puts Incubator policy a little
> more relaxed than ASF, but likely not as relaxed as I would have
> posited (in regards to dependencies).
>
The good thing about release votes is that they can't be vetoed so
regardless of what policies may or may not be documented whether or
not a release vote passes is just down to getting enough people to
vote +1. Votes on general@ often stall and require a respin when
someone claims something is wrong which puts off others from voting.
Something as basic as a dependent license missing from the LICENSE
file would be one of those things that in the past would have always
demanded a respin, so the change, and it is a change, to allow wiggle
room is what i hope people will remember from this.
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:54 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...
>> You can look at the archives back in 2006 when it was incubating. In
>> particular, there is one sent to private@incubator that I would refer
>> you to:
>> http://s.apache.org/c04 [only usable by ASF Members]
>>
>
> Didn't that get subsequently revised by Cliff et al into "Incubating
> projects must not distribute an official product release that includes
> works covered by an excluded license" -
> http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition-incubator
Dunno. That link is for a draft document, and has been replaced by a
final/resolved form (see link at top of page).
Regardless... Jukka posted recently, and I'd look to his note for
"current policy". I think his statement puts Incubator policy a little
more relaxed than ASF, but likely not as relaxed as I would have
posited (in regards to dependencies).
Cheers,
-g
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:38 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies
>>> in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't
>>> recall any releases like that.
>>
>> I know AOO had interactions with Legal regarding dmake, dictionaries and so
>> on, though I don't recall exactly what went into their release. I would be
>> surprised if any category X dependencies have wound up in an incubating
>> release without Legal's involvement.
>>
>> Lucy's early incubating releases had two Perl-licensed (Artistic/GPL)
>> dependencies (which were not bundled, but had to be downloaded and installed
>> separately by the consumer). We sought a variance from Legal and got specific
>> approval from the Legal VP for our plan, which involved ditching both of the
>> problematic dependencies prior to graduation:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-86
>>
>> Are there other examples?
>
> The one that I had in mind was Roller. Several of its incubating
> releases had a hard dependency on Hibernate. They were required to
> clean it up before graduation, of course.
>
> You can look at the archives back in 2006 when it was incubating. In
> particular, there is one sent to private@incubator that I would refer
> you to:
> http://s.apache.org/c04 [only usable by ASF Members]
>
Didn't that get subsequently revised by Cliff et al into "Incubating
projects must not distribute an official product release that includes
works covered by an excluded license" -
http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#transition-incubator
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:38 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies
>> in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't
>> recall any releases like that.
>
> I know AOO had interactions with Legal regarding dmake, dictionaries and so
> on, though I don't recall exactly what went into their release. I would be
> surprised if any category X dependencies have wound up in an incubating
> release without Legal's involvement.
>
> Lucy's early incubating releases had two Perl-licensed (Artistic/GPL)
> dependencies (which were not bundled, but had to be downloaded and installed
> separately by the consumer). We sought a variance from Legal and got specific
> approval from the Legal VP for our plan, which involved ditching both of the
> problematic dependencies prior to graduation:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-86
>
> Are there other examples?
The one that I had in mind was Roller. Several of its incubating
releases had a hard dependency on Hibernate. They were required to
clean it up before graduation, of course.
You can look at the archives back in 2006 when it was incubating. In
particular, there is one sent to private@incubator that I would refer
you to:
http://s.apache.org/c04 [only usable by ASF Members]
>> Anyway thats beside the point, ok so lets have this be a precedent
>> that sets Incubator policy - we now have some wiggle room while
>> incubating to do a release that violates ASF release policy as long as
>> it will be fixed soon in another release and definitely before
>> graduating.
>
> It seems that with regards to this Bloodhound release, the issue is restricted
> to LICENSE/NOTICE, an area where ASF policies are notoriously unclear and
> conformance is arguably spotty even among TLPs.
I've given some bad info in the past, but after the last go-round
(thanks Marvin), I feel that I've got a better handle on it. And
that's the feedback that I've now provided to the BH people.
> So long as the licenses of
> all dependencies are being obeyed (e.g. no license headers or mandatory files
> stripped from source files) and usage is compatible with ASF policy (no
> category X dependencies, etc),
All good here.
> I agree with the judgment call that an
> incubating release need not be held up simply to move the text of the license
> from LICENSE to NOTICE or vice versa.
>
> IMO, this is different from releases with category X dependencies, where ASF
> policies are clear and conformance is very high among TLPs. I don't see that
> the Incubator should consider this vote a precedent for overturning arbitrary
> ASF policy.
For TLPs, I totally agree. For projects that are incubating... they
are NOT ASF projects by definition. That is why we've allowed a bit of
wiggle.
In any case, Bloodhound isn't requesting any funny deps. Just getting
a release out there which some already-known issues. That's why it got
my +1, and recommendation to just go with 0.1.0 rather than spinning
up a new tarball.
Cheers,
-g
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:38 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies
> in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't
> recall any releases like that.
I know AOO had interactions with Legal regarding dmake, dictionaries and so
on, though I don't recall exactly what went into their release. I would be
surprised if any category X dependencies have wound up in an incubating
release without Legal's involvement.
Lucy's early incubating releases had two Perl-licensed (Artistic/GPL)
dependencies (which were not bundled, but had to be downloaded and installed
separately by the consumer). We sought a variance from Legal and got specific
approval from the Legal VP for our plan, which involved ditching both of the
problematic dependencies prior to graduation:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-86
Are there other examples?
> Anyway thats beside the point, ok so lets have this be a precedent
> that sets Incubator policy - we now have some wiggle room while
> incubating to do a release that violates ASF release policy as long as
> it will be fixed soon in another release and definitely before
> graduating.
It seems that with regards to this Bloodhound release, the issue is restricted
to LICENSE/NOTICE, an area where ASF policies are notoriously unclear and
conformance is arguably spotty even among TLPs. So long as the licenses of
all dependencies are being obeyed (e.g. no license headers or mandatory files
stripped from source files) and usage is compatible with ASF policy (no
category X dependencies, etc), I agree with the judgment call that an
incubating release need not be held up simply to move the text of the license
from LICENSE to NOTICE or vice versa.
IMO, this is different from releases with category X dependencies, where ASF
policies are clear and conformance is very high among TLPs. I don't see that
the Incubator should consider this vote a precedent for overturning arbitrary
ASF policy.
If we don't like the poor state of ASF policy and conformance on
LICENSE/NOTICE then the ASF Membership should work to clarify the policy.
Marvin Humphrey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:14 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>...
>> This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening
>> right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery
>> but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised
>> people are continuing to vote +1 on the Syncope release knowing that
>> so am I getting this wrong and the JQuery license doesn't need to be
>> included here for some reason?
>
> My feeling on the matter here is that these are incubating projects.
> We allow things like (L)GPL dependencies in the releases, as long as a
> PLAN exists to get rid of them. Of course, it must be perfectly clean
> to graduate. But I believe we have wiggle room while incubating.
>
> As Branko noted, the included projects are mentioned in the NOTICE
> file, but that isn't quite Right. The 0.2.0 release will get it
> corrected.
>
> We could have stepped back and rolled another tarball, but I believe
> it is more important for Bloodhound to get a release out [than to be
> perfect on 0.1.0], in order to get some traction and some attraction
> to build a larger community. The BH folks plan to release every few
> weeks, so we should see the corrections in a release at the end of the
> month. (or we could convince Gary to do another in a week or two :-)
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>
Gosh i'm pretty sure we _don't_ allow things like (L)GPL dependencies
in Incubator releases, we allow them in the source in SVN but i don't
recall any releases like that.
Anyway thats beside the point, ok so lets have this be a precedent
that sets Incubator policy - we now have some wiggle room while
incubating to do a release that violates ASF release policy as long as
it will be fixed soon in another release and definitely before
graduating. A policy like that would help a lot with avoiding the
numerous respins some poddling releases are made to do during voting
on general@.
...ant
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:14 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>...
> This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening
> right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery
> but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised
> people are continuing to vote +1 on the Syncope release knowing that
> so am I getting this wrong and the JQuery license doesn't need to be
> included here for some reason?
My feeling on the matter here is that these are incubating projects.
We allow things like (L)GPL dependencies in the releases, as long as a
PLAN exists to get rid of them. Of course, it must be perfectly clean
to graduate. But I believe we have wiggle room while incubating.
As Branko noted, the included projects are mentioned in the NOTICE
file, but that isn't quite Right. The 0.2.0 release will get it
corrected.
We could have stepped back and rolled another tarball, but I believe
it is more important for Bloodhound to get a release out [than to be
perfect on 0.1.0], in order to get some traction and some attraction
to build a larger community. The BH folks plan to release every few
weeks, so we should see the corrections in a release at the end of the
month. (or we could convince Gary to do another in a week or two :-)
Cheers,
-g
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com>.
On 08/07/2012 12:39 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 07.08.2012 13:14, ant elder wrote:
>> This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening
>> right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery
>> but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised
>> people are continuing to vote +1 on the Syncope release knowing that
>> so am I getting this wrong and the JQuery license doesn't need to be
>> included here for some reason?
> The NOTICE file explicitly notes external dependencies and their
> (standard) licenses. Combined with the ticket that mentions adding
> licenses of said dependencies to LICENSE, IMO, this is good enough for a
> release candidate.
>
> -- Brane
>
I think it is also worth noting that Greg Stein has already mentioned
this - see the first item in
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153 (which also contains the
link to Greg's email) - and so this will be attended to in the next release.
Cheers,
Gary
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>.
On 07.08.2012 13:14, ant elder wrote:
> This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening
> right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery
> but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised
> people are continuing to vote +1 on the Syncope release knowing that
> so am I getting this wrong and the JQuery license doesn't need to be
> included here for some reason?
The NOTICE file explicitly notes external dependencies and their
(standard) licenses. Combined with the ticket that mentions adding
licenses of said dependencies to LICENSE, IMO, this is good enough for a
release candidate.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0 (incubating)
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to request the beginning of the vote for the first release
> Apache Bloodhound in the incubator following the successful vote by the
> Bloodhound PPMC. Two of the four +1 PPMC votes were from the IPMC members
> Greg Stein and Hyrum Wright.
>
> The result of the vote is summarised here:
>
> http://markmail.org/message/i3g5t2m7gajuoyv6
>
> The artefacts for the release including the source distribution and KEYS can
> be found here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bloodhound/
>
> The release itself is created from:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bloodhound/branches/0.1
> (r1362530)
>
> Issues identified by Greg and Hyrum to be fixed for the next release are
> listed here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/153
>
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours and therefore ends after 11pm
> UTC on Thursday 9th August.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bloodhound 0.1.0
> [ ] +0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package (please explain)
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
This looks similar to the Syncope release vote thats also happening
right now in that the source distribution includes things like JQuery
but doesn't mention that in the LICENSE file. I'm a bit surprised
people are continuing to vote +1 on the Syncope release knowing that
so am I getting this wrong and the JQuery license doesn't need to be
included here for some reason?
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org