You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com.INVALID> on 2017/10/10 15:16:27 UTC

Intent to backport OAK-6218

Hi,

I'd like to backport OAK-6218 to the maintenance branches. It adds additional information to a DocumentStoreException about IDs of affected documents. As such it is not a bug fix, but very useful when analyzing what went wrong. I consider it a low risk change.

Regards
 Marcel

Re: Intent to backport OAK-6218

Posted by Matt Ryan <os...@mvryan.org>.

+1 (nonbinding)


On October 10, 2017 at 9:23:26 AM, Chetan Mehrotra (
chetan.mehrotra@gmail.com) wrote:

+1
Chetan Mehrotra


On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>
wrote:
> On 2017-10-10 17:16, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to backport OAK-6218 to the maintenance branches. It adds
>> additional information to a DocumentStoreException about IDs of affected
>> documents. As such it is not a bug fix, but very useful when analyzing
what
>> went wrong. I consider it a low risk change.
>
>
> +1
>

Re: Intent to backport OAK-6218

Posted by Chetan Mehrotra <ch...@gmail.com>.

+1
Chetan Mehrotra


On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 2017-10-10 17:16, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to backport OAK-6218 to the maintenance branches. It adds
>> additional information to a DocumentStoreException about IDs of affected
>> documents. As such it is not a bug fix, but very useful when analyzing what
>> went wrong. I consider it a low risk change.
>
>
> +1
>

Re: Intent to backport OAK-6218

Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.

On 2017-10-10 17:16, Marcel Reutegger wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to backport OAK-6218 to the maintenance branches. It adds additional information to a DocumentStoreException about IDs of affected documents. As such it is not a bug fix, but very useful when analyzing what went wrong. I consider it a low risk change.

+1