You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to docs@httpd.apache.org by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com> on 2016/09/26 21:15:58 UTC

"missing designation data for language edited." after java update?

I'm seeing some spam during docs/manual builds for some time, I think
it started when I moved to java8.

     [xslt] Processing
/home/covener/SRC/httpd-trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_rewrite.xml.meta to
/home/covener/SRC/httpd-trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_rewrite.html
    [xslt] home/covener/SRC/httpd-trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/typemap.xsl:59:34:
Warning!
    [xslt] FATAL: missing designation data for language edited.
    [xslt] The XSLT-Stylesheet won't work without modification.
    [xslt]

$ cat /home/covener/SRC/httpd-trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_rewrite.xml.meta
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<!-- GENERATED FROM XML: DO NOT EDIT -->

<metafile reference="mod_rewrite.xml">
 <basename>mod_rewrite</basename>
 <path>/mod/</path>
 <relpath>..</relpath>

 <variants>
   <variant>edited</variant>
   <variant>en</variant>
   <variant>fr</variant>
 </variants>
</metafile>

From laymens POV, it is treating this "edited" variant as if it was a
language. I don't know if my java change is the cause of the .meta
contents or just a change in how it is interpreted.

Anyone chase this down before or have any hints?  Thanks

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Re: "missing designation data for language edited." after java update?

Posted by Eric Covener <co...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 4:41 PM, André Malo <nd...@perlig.de> wrote:
> * Eric Covener wrote:
>
>> I'm seeing some spam during docs/manual builds for some time, I think
>> it started when I moved to java8.
>>
>>      [xslt] Processing
>> /home/covener/SRC/httpd-trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_rewrite.xml.meta to
>> /home/covener/SRC/httpd-trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_rewrite.html
>>     [xslt]
>> home/covener/SRC/httpd-trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/typemap.xsl:59:34:
>> Warning!
>>     [xslt] FATAL: missing designation data for language edited.
>>     [xslt] The XSLT-Stylesheet won't work without modification.
>>     [xslt]

Thanks -- I did find some *.edited in the filesystem.  They appear to
be from svn during some kinds of merge problems.   They must be the
culprit.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Re: "missing designation data for language edited." after java update?

Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Eric Covener wrote:

> I'm seeing some spam during docs/manual builds for some time, I think
> it started when I moved to java8.
>
>      [xslt] Processing
> /home/covener/SRC/httpd-trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_rewrite.xml.meta to
> /home/covener/SRC/httpd-trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_rewrite.html
>     [xslt]
> home/covener/SRC/httpd-trunk/docs/manual/style/xsl/typemap.xsl:59:34:
> Warning!
>     [xslt] FATAL: missing designation data for language edited.
>     [xslt] The XSLT-Stylesheet won't work without modification.
>     [xslt]


>
> $ cat /home/covener/SRC/httpd-trunk/docs/manual/mod/mod_rewrite.xml.meta
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
> <!-- GENERATED FROM XML: DO NOT EDIT -->
>
> <metafile reference="mod_rewrite.xml">
>  <basename>mod_rewrite</basename>
>  <path>/mod/</path>
>  <relpath>..</relpath>
>
>  <variants>
>    <variant>edited</variant>
>    <variant>en</variant>
>    <variant>fr</variant>
>  </variants>
> </metafile>
>
> From laymens POV, it is treating this "edited" variant as if it was a
> language. I don't know if my java change is the cause of the .meta
> contents or just a change in how it is interpreted.

Weird. And cannot reproduce. The interpretion is correct, though (it IS 
interpreted as a language). On the other hand the meta files are generated 
with perl. Also, I'm using java 8 for ages now, it should work easily.

What happens if you run `./build.sh metafiles`? Does it change? Maybe the 
checkout has a problem?

Ah.. second thought... Does your editor create working files or backups 
called *.edited?

Cheers,
-- 
Das einzige, das einen Gebäudekollaps (oder auch einen
thermonuklearen Krieg) unbeschadet übersteht, sind Kakerlaken
und AOL-CDs.
                                      -- Bastian Lipp in dcsm

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org