You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ws.apache.org by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> on 2008/08/25 03:23:41 UTC
Re: [repo] /www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/
AFAIK, there was no vote that i can recall.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Kurt T Stam <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I should have time later this week to take a look. I should just be able to
>> redo the release right?
>
> Thanks, Kurt. Ideally you still have the original artifacts locally
> on the machine where you did the release, and can create the
> signatures from those. As Jukka mentioned, please try to provide only
> the .asc files, without modifying the jars and poms.
>
> Re-doing the entire release is not recommended. Once published,
> artifacts in the repo are not supposed to change. (And you would
> likely need to re-do the vote, since the PMC will have voted on those
> specific binaries.)
>
> --
> Wendy
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [repo] /www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Kurt,
you need 3 pmc votes before you push anything into the public repositories.
- -- dims
Kurt T Stam wrote:
> Hi Dims,
>
> The vote was here:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-scout-dev/200808.mbox/browser
>
> thx,
>
> --Kurt
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> AFAIK, there was no vote that i can recall.
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Kurt T Stam <ku...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I should have time later this week to take a look. I should just be
>>>> able to
>>>> redo the release right?
>>>>
>>> Thanks, Kurt. Ideally you still have the original artifacts locally
>>> on the machine where you did the release, and can create the
>>> signatures from those. As Jukka mentioned, please try to provide only
>>> the .asc files, without modifying the jars and poms.
>>>
>>> Re-doing the entire release is not recommended. Once published,
>>> artifacts in the repo are not supposed to change. (And you would
>>> likely need to re-do the vote, since the PMC will have voted on those
>>> specific binaries.)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Wendy
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFItfQ+gNg6eWEDv1kRAnpzAJ4yXmKnTPyqL0ZlYQxhUDEG27M9xwCdFKTb
LBZKi0IFgeWzfDGohIELyNU=
=kbmE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: [repo] /www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Kurt,
you need 3 pmc votes before you push anything into the public repositories.
- -- dims
Kurt T Stam wrote:
> Hi Dims,
>
> The vote was here:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-scout-dev/200808.mbox/browser
>
> thx,
>
> --Kurt
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> AFAIK, there was no vote that i can recall.
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Kurt T Stam <ku...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I should have time later this week to take a look. I should just be
>>>> able to
>>>> redo the release right?
>>>>
>>> Thanks, Kurt. Ideally you still have the original artifacts locally
>>> on the machine where you did the release, and can create the
>>> signatures from those. As Jukka mentioned, please try to provide only
>>> the .asc files, without modifying the jars and poms.
>>>
>>> Re-doing the entire release is not recommended. Once published,
>>> artifacts in the repo are not supposed to change. (And you would
>>> likely need to re-do the vote, since the PMC will have voted on those
>>> specific binaries.)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Wendy
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFItfQ+gNg6eWEDv1kRAnpzAJ4yXmKnTPyqL0ZlYQxhUDEG27M9xwCdFKTb
LBZKi0IFgeWzfDGohIELyNU=
=kbmE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@ws.apache.org
Re: [repo] /www/people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/
Posted by Kurt T Stam <ku...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dims,
The vote was here:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-scout-dev/200808.mbox/browser
thx,
--Kurt
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> AFAIK, there was no vote that i can recall.
>
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:26 PM, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Kurt T Stam <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I should have time later this week to take a look. I should just be able to
>>> redo the release right?
>>>
>> Thanks, Kurt. Ideally you still have the original artifacts locally
>> on the machine where you did the release, and can create the
>> signatures from those. As Jukka mentioned, please try to provide only
>> the .asc files, without modifying the jars and poms.
>>
>> Re-doing the entire release is not recommended. Once published,
>> artifacts in the repo are not supposed to change. (And you would
>> likely need to re-do the vote, since the PMC will have voted on those
>> specific binaries.)
>>
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>>
>
>
>
>