You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cloudstack.apache.org by "DeepthiMachiraju (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/12/28 11:09:58 UTC
[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-9712) Establishing Remote access VPN
is failing due to mismatch of preshared secrets.
DeepthiMachiraju created CLOUDSTACK-9712:
--------------------------------------------
Summary: Establishing Remote access VPN is failing due to mismatch of preshared secrets.
Key: CLOUDSTACK-9712
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9712
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.)
Components: Virtual Router
Affects Versions: 4.9.0
Reporter: DeepthiMachiraju
Priority: Critical
- On a Isolated Network enable VPN , and configure few VPN users.
- Deploy a windows 2012R2 VM in the shared network . Create a new VPN connection by providing the NAt ip , select L2tp in the confguration and provide the psk provided by cloudstack.
- Try logging with the vpn users created above.
Observations :
- User fails to login with the following error message at client : " Error 789 : The L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer encountered a processing error during initial negotiations with the remote computer ".
- Each time VPN is DIsabled/Enabled , new key is stored in ipsec.any.secrets.
root@r-5-VM:~# cat /etc/ipsec.d/ipsec.any.secrets
: PSK "O3rEXqxgMXRvNkPRXaqtkg43"
: PSK "ZwEcGeHKnE9z2zpPht9eh77T"
: PSK "7CUjMgwO8sbMJXjyHhRg2NDp"
=============================================auth.log==============================================
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [MS NT5 ISAKMPOAKLEY 00000009]
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: received Vendor ID payload [RFC 3947] method set to=109
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: received Vendor ID payload [draft-ietf-ipsec-nat-t-ike-02_n] meth=106, but already using method 109
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [FRAGMENTATION]
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [MS-Negotiation Discovery Capable]
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [Vid-Initial-Contact]
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: packet from 10.147.52.62:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload [IKE CGA version 1]
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: responding to Main Mode from unknown peer 10.147.52.62
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: OAKLEY_GROUP 20 not supported. Attribute OAKLEY_GROUP_DESCRIPTION
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: OAKLEY_GROUP 19 not supported. Attribute OAKLEY_GROUP_DESCRIPTION
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R0 to state STATE_MAIN_R1
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: STATE_MAIN_R1: sent MR1, expecting MI2
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: NAT-Traversal: Result using RFC 3947 (NAT-Traversal): no NAT detected
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: multiple ipsec.secrets entries with distinct secrets match endpoints: first secret used
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: transition from state STATE_MAIN_R1 to state STATE_MAIN_R2
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: STATE_MAIN_R2: sent MR2, expecting MI3
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48
Dec 28 10:49:30 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500
Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255
Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet
Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV
Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e
Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48
Dec 28 10:49:31 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500
Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255
Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet
Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV
Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e
Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48
Dec 28 10:49:32 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500
Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255
Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet
Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV
Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e
Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48
Dec 28 10:49:35 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500
Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: next payload type of ISAKMP Identification Payload has an unknown value: 255
Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: probable authentication failure (mismatch of preshared secrets?): malformed payload in packet
Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | payload malformed after IV
Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 87 74 c8 93 55 12 88 96 81 35 42 4c 4f 0d 4c 9e
Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: | 3e 71 6f 48
Dec 28 10:49:42 r-5-VM pluto[2828]: "L2TP-PSK"[3] 10.147.52.62 #18: sending notification PAYLOAD_MALFORMED to 10.147.52.62:500
=================================================================================================
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)