You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@hadoop.apache.org by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> on 2011/06/15 05:19:18 UTC
[VOTE] Powered by Logo
All,
We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Eran Kampf <er...@ekampf.com>.
My vote: 5 6 4 2 1 3
- Eran
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by 孙兆玉 <sz...@gmail.com>.
2 5 6
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by bc Wong <bc...@cloudera.com>.
5, 6, 2.
Cheers,
bc
Re:[VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by 郭顺旭 <gu...@163.com>.
My vote (in order of course): 2, 6, 4, 3, 5, 1.
At 2011-06-15 11:19:18，"Owen OMalley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
>http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
>Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
>My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
>In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
>-- Owen
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Esteban Gutierrez <es...@cloudera.com>.
5, 6, 4, 2, 3, 1
esteban.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Kyoji KATO <mp...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> My vote.. 6,3,5,4,2,1
>
> Thanks,
> Kyoji KATO
>
> On 15 June 2011 12:19, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > All,
> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> > all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> > will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Kyoji KATO <mp...@googlemail.com>.
Hey all,
My vote.. 6,3,5,4,2,1
Thanks,
Kyoji KATO
On 15 June 2011 12:19, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Pedro Figueiredo <pe...@playfish.com>.
5, 4, 2, 6, 1, 3
Cheers,
Pedro Figueiredo
Systems Engineer, Playfish
EA Interactive
Skype: pfiguk
Web: http://www.playfish.com
----
Electronic Arts Ltd, Registered office address Onslow House, Onslow Street, Guildford, Surrey, GU1 4TN, UK. Reg. in England & Wales, Reg. No. 2057591
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>.
On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:36 PM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:
> When casting your vote, please keep in mind that the vast majority of the
> time the "Powered By" logo will be displayed in a size much smaller than
> what is displayed on Owen's link.
That's a really good point Aaron. The fonts in all of the examples are probably smaller than they should be to be very readable in the 4th (100 pixel width) column.
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by "Aaron T. Myers" <at...@cloudera.com>.
When casting your vote, please keep in mind that the vast majority of the
time the "Powered By" logo will be displayed in a size much smaller than
what is displayed on Owen's link. Here's a similar page which shows all the
logos at a few different sizes:
http://people.apache.org/~atm/hadoop-powered-by/
(This is the reason I prefer choice #5 to all others. I believe it'll be
more visually distinct from the project logo at small sizes, which was the
point of developing a "Powered By" logo in the first place.)
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Jonathan Eagles <je...@gmail.com>.
My vote: 2, 4, 5, 6, 3, 1.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Weiwei Li <ha...@gmail.com>.
5 6 2 1 4 3
2011/6/15 Dhruba Borthakur <dh...@gmail.com>
> 5 only
>
> -dhruba
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> > 5 6 4 2 3 1
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > All,
> > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them
> > all on a page, here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> > >
> > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> > >
> > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> > >
> > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> > will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> > >
> > > -- Owen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Harsh J
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Dhruba Borthakur <dh...@gmail.com>.
5 only
-dhruba
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> 5 6 4 2 3 1
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> > All,
> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
>
--
Connect to me at http://www.facebook.com/dhruba
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Xavier Stevens <xs...@mozilla.com>.
My vote: 5, 4, 2, 6, 3, 1
On 6/15/11 8:55 AM, Marcos Ortiz wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 07:44 AM, Harsh J wrote:
>> 5 6 4 2 3 1
> My vote
> 5, 4, 6, 3, 1, 2
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Marcos Ortiz <ml...@uci.cu>.
On 06/15/2011 07:44 AM, Harsh J wrote:
> 5 6 4 2 3 1
My vote
5, 4, 6, 3, 1, 2
--
Marcos Luís Ortíz Valmaseda
Software Engineer (UCI)
http://marcosluis2186.posterous.com
http://twitter.com/marcosluis2186
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Harsh J <ha...@cloudera.com>.
5 6 4 2 3 1
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
--
Harsh J
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by "Tsz Wo (Nicholas), Sze" <s2...@yahoo.com>.
4, 2
Regards,
Tsz-Wo
________________________________
From: Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 8:19:18 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
All,
We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on
a page, here:
http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
let's use single transferable vote ( STV
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
automatically roll over to your next choice.
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Chun Chang <cc...@maprtech.com>.
2,4,6,1,3,5
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:44 AM, M. C. Srivas <mc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 4, 2, 6, 1
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:22 AM, James Warren <
> james.warren@stanfordalumni.org> wrote:
>
> > 5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 6
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them
> > > all on a page, here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> > >
> > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> > >
> > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> > >
> > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your
> vote
> > > will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> > >
> > > -- Owen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by "M. C. Srivas" <mc...@gmail.com>.
4, 2, 6, 1
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:22 AM, James Warren <
james.warren@stanfordalumni.org> wrote:
> 5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 6
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > All,
> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> > all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> > will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by James Warren <ja...@stanfordalumni.org>.
5, 4, 2, 3, 1, 6
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 18:30, Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop.
> The feather would classy on that background too.
> And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop.
Yeah, lotta heavy lifting here for sure...
> --Konstantin
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho
>> power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man!
>>
>> It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their
>> votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here!
>> --
>> Take care,
>> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
>> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
>>
>> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
>> and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
>> might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > It should look something like this:
>> >
>> http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg
>> >
>> > But given the choices: 6 2 4 5 1 3
>> >
>> > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
>> > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --Konstantin
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> All,
>> >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
>> >> all on a page, here:
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>> >>
>> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
>> >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
>> >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>> >>
>> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>> >>
>> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
>> >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
>> >> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>> >>
>> >> -- Owen
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by web service <wb...@gmail.com>.
2.
Yep, the feather is bit ....arghhhhh.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Ken Goodhope <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 6,2,4
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Shvachko
> <sh...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop.
> > The feather would classy on that background too.
> > And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop.
> > --Konstantin
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho
> > > power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man!
> > >
> > > It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their
> > > votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here!
> > > --
> > > Take care,
> > > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> > > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> > >
> > > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
> > > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
> > > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko <
> shv.hadoop@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > It should look something like this:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg
> > > >
> > > > But given the choices: 6 2 4 5 1 3
> > > >
> > > > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
> > > > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > --Konstantin
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> All,
> > > >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> > them
> > > >> all on a page, here:
> > > >>
> > > >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> > > >>
> > > >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round
> of
> > > >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The
> important
> > > >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> > > >>
> > > >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> > > >>
> > > >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV,
> you
> > > >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your
> > vote
> > > >> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> > > >>
> > > >> -- Owen
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Ken Goodhope <ke...@gmail.com>.
6,2,4
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Konstantin Shvachko
<sh...@gmail.com>wrote:
> It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop.
> The feather would classy on that background too.
> And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop.
> --Konstantin
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho
> > power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man!
> >
> > It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their
> > votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here!
> > --
> > Take care,
> > Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> > 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
> >
> > Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
> > and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
> > might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko <shv.hadoop@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > > It should look something like this:
> > >
> >
> http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg
> > >
> > > But given the choices: 6 2 4 5 1 3
> > >
> > > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
> > > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --Konstantin
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> All,
> > >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them
> > >> all on a page, here:
> > >>
> > >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> > >>
> > >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> > >>
> > >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> > >>
> > >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your
> vote
> > >> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> > >>
> > >> -- Owen
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>.
It's not macho, it's the power coming from Hadoop.
The feather would classy on that background too.
And children need exercise, especially those dealing with Hadoop.
--Konstantin
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:08 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho
> power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man!
>
> It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their
> votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here!
> --
> Take care,
> Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
> 2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
>
> Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
> and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
> might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > It should look something like this:
> >
> http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg
> >
> > But given the choices: 6 2 4 5 1 3
> >
> > I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
> > I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Konstantin
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> >> all on a page, here:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >>
> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >>
> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >>
> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> >> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >>
> >> -- Owen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
What are you trying to say? Let's promote a brutal muscling macho
power vs. a stuffed yet adorable animal? Think of the children, man!
It's been an interesting race: so far 49 people have casted their
votes. I think this is by far most alive discussion here!
--
Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 17:57, Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It should look something like this:
> http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg
>
> But given the choices: 6 2 4 5 1 3
>
> I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
> I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it.
>
> Thanks,
> --Konstantin
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> All,
>> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
>> all on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
>> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
>> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
>> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
>> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Andreas Neumann <an...@yahoo-inc.com>.
2 4 5 6 1 3
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Konstantin Shvachko <sh...@gmail.com>.
It should look something like this:
http://api.ning.com/files/6tMSBWmZ67YKGzfS0NBp6Xt67YUi5L4ft6OZRsIrq-3EO40OP0mqSJs4b3*5QV0V7shmKnK44LzEGzNSvmDUFqCv6hirrSWX/1105100WC001.jpeg
But given the choices: 6 2 4 5 1 3
I put 6 first because it's the only one having Apache logo on it.
I think whatever choice wins the feather should be put on it.
Thanks,
--Konstantin
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Tom White <to...@gmail.com>.
4, 2, 1, 5, 6, 3
Tom
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>.
On 15/06/11 04:19, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
>
my vote: 4, 5, 2
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by lohit <lo...@yahoo.com>.
4,5,6,3,2,1
PS: Powered logo would be advertised by users. Their vote should count :)
----- Original Message ----
From: Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Tue, June 14, 2011 8:19:18 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
All,
We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on
a page, here:
http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
let's use single transferable vote ( STV
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
automatically roll over to your next choice.
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by "Aaron T. Myers" <at...@cloudera.com>.
My vote: 5 1 6 2 3 4
tl;dr regarding STV - since we're only selecting one winner, STV reduces to
instant-runoff voting.
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org>.
5, 2, 4, 6, 1, 3
Doug
On 06/15/2011 05:19 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Allen Wittenauer <aw...@apache.org>.
On Jun 15, 2011, at 1:44 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> 4, 2, 6
>
> Yes. That isn't enough votes, but I think that the other logos don't cut
> the mustard for various reasons. 5 is a recycled product logo and I don't
> think the others make the required visual case.
+1
4,2,6
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com>.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com> wrote:
> 4, 2, 6
>
> Yes. That isn't enough votes, but I think that the other logos don't cut
> the mustard for various reasons. 5 is a recycled product logo and I don't
> think the others make the required visual case.
5 is not a product logo, nor was it. Aaron Nuton contributed this and
the Hive logo (which was subsequently adopted) to Apache.
See MAPREDUCE-484 and
http://www.cloudera.com/blog/2009/04/hive-and-jobtracker-needed-logos.
This logo was used as an icon in Hue (Hadoop user interface) which is
an Apache licensed open source project.
Thanks,
Eli
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com>.
4, 2, 6
Yes. That isn't enough votes, but I think that the other logos don't cut
the mustard for various reasons. 5 is a recycled product logo and I don't
think the others make the required visual case.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu <
amarsri@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> My vote 4, 5, 2, 3, 1, 6
>
> Thanks
> Amareshwari
>
> On 6/15/11 9:57 AM, "Todd Lipcon" <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?
>
> My vote: 5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 4
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > All,
> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> > all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> > will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Devaraj K <de...@huawei.com>.
4,5,1,2,6,3
Devaraj K
-----Original Message-----
From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:04 PM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?
Sorry, I should have been clearer. Everyone is allowed and encouraged to
vote. Only the PMC votes are binding, however.
-- Owen =
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>.
On Jun 14, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Todd Lipcon wrote:
> Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?
Sorry, I should have been clearer. Everyone is allowed and encouraged to vote. Only the PMC votes are binding, however.
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Amareshwari Sri Ramadasu <am...@yahoo-inc.com>.
My vote 4, 5, 2, 3, 1, 6
Thanks
Amareshwari
On 6/15/11 9:57 AM, "Todd Lipcon" <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?
My vote: 5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 4
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>.
Who is allowed to vote in this? Committers? PMC? Everyone?
My vote: 5, 2, 6, 3, 1, 4
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
--
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
2
St.Ack
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com>.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com> wrote:
> But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent
> consensus being formed. That will result in the same result as no decision
> at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own).
The the binding votes are from limited number of PMC members. I see no
obstacle reaching consensus even if we have much larger number of
selections.
> Owen already asked for votes on the original 6. The only substantive
> difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the
> esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants
> nose).
Elephant's nose is a versatile hand. What political sub-text are you
talking about? I see no problem with an elephant upholding an apache
feather. OTOH, feather in hand/nose is not the most substantive
element rather than playful variation. The key element is the theme of
apache and hadoop bigger than the proverbial elephant.
> Font size can and will be adjusted. That adjustment will be done by
> our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted consensus.
Since you eluded aesthetic and political sub-text, the MapR circle is
problematic as well, which IMO looks like a plastic button or a
deformed mouse wheel confining the elephant.
> My own view here is that consensus is at least as important as the precise
> content. Adding new options tends to value small details in content over
> consensus. I would prefer to not muddy the issue further.
Again, I see no problem reaching a consensus here, given the limited
number of binding votes.
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, web service <wb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Can we still submit logos ?
>>
>> I encourage everyone who care about the logo to attach submissions to
>> HADOOP-7020 (make sure you click grant rights to apache in the attach
>> files form). As Ted said, the logos here are mostly thematic. The
>> final version would be tweaked by a professional designer with
>> input/ideas from all the submissions.
>>
>> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
>> >> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
>> >> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
>> >> in height, where they are completely illegible.
>> >>
>> >> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
>> >> the choices:
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
>> >>
>> >> Please find the larger version on
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
>> >>
>> >> __Luke
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> > All,
>> >> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
>> them
>> >> all on a page, here:
>> >> >
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>> >> >
>> >> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
>> >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
>> >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>> >> >
>> >> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>> >> >
>> >> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
>> >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
>> >> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>> >> >
>> >> > -- Owen
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com>.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com> wrote:
> ?
>
> Are you talking about color palette choices? We use a pretty ordinary
> corporate blue based palette which inevitably makes gray tones important.
>
> Or the fact that we put circular borders around badge-like design element
> like this: http://mapr.com/images/products/dependable/btn_ha.png ?
>
Yup.
> I don't think that we have any isolated rings such as the proposed logo on
> mapr.com at this time. We would like to (i.e. if this logo gets approved).
>
> How would you suggest adjusting the circle?
>
Would be good for it not to re-use the same circular border, ie the
design elements should be visually distinct. Assume the artist just
used the existing design element they had and wrapped it around the
Hadoop logo vs creating a new one.
Thanks,
Eli
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com>
>> wrote:
>> > But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent
>> > consensus being formed. That will result in the same result as no
>> decision
>> > at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own).
>> >
>> > Owen already asked for votes on the original 6. The only substantive
>> > difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the
>> > esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants
>> > nose). Font size can and will be adjusted. That adjustment will be done
>> by
>> > our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted
>> consensus.
>> >
>>
>> If the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the
>> circle itself, I noticed that the circle in your logo submission is
>> the same design element used throughout MapR.com.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eli
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com>.
?
Are you talking about color palette choices? We use a pretty ordinary
corporate blue based palette which inevitably makes gray tones important.
Or the fact that we put circular borders around badge-like design element
like this: http://mapr.com/images/products/dependable/btn_ha.png ?
I don't think that we have any isolated rings such as the proposed logo on
mapr.com at this time. We would like to (i.e. if this logo gets approved).
How would you suggest adjusting the circle?
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com>
> wrote:
> > But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent
> > consensus being formed. That will result in the same result as no
> decision
> > at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own).
> >
> > Owen already asked for votes on the original 6. The only substantive
> > difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the
> > esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants
> > nose). Font size can and will be adjusted. That adjustment will be done
> by
> > our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted
> consensus.
> >
>
> If the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the
> circle itself, I noticed that the circle in your logo submission is
> the same design element used throughout MapR.com.
>
> Thanks,
> Eli
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Jakob Homan <jg...@gmail.com>.
Whatever gets picked, I volunteer to have some stickers printed up so
we can all put them on our bikesheds. Seems appropriate.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com> wrote:
>> But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent
>> consensus being formed. That will result in the same result as no decision
>> at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own).
>>
>> Owen already asked for votes on the original 6. The only substantive
>> difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the
>> esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants
>> nose). Font size can and will be adjusted. That adjustment will be done by
>> our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted consensus.
>>
>
> If the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the
> circle itself, I noticed that the circle in your logo submission is
> the same design element used throughout MapR.com.
>
> Thanks,
> Eli
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com>.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com> wrote:
> But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent
> consensus being formed. That will result in the same result as no decision
> at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own).
>
> Owen already asked for votes on the original 6. The only substantive
> difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the
> esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants
> nose). Font size can and will be adjusted. That adjustment will be done by
> our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted consensus.
>
If the circle logo concept is accepted it would be good to adjust the
circle itself, I noticed that the circle in your logo submission is
the same design element used throughout MapR.com.
Thanks,
Eli
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com>.
But keep in mind that creating new logos forever will tend to prevent
consensus being formed. That will result in the same result as no decision
at all (i.e. everybody will just use their own).
Owen already asked for votes on the original 6. The only substantive
difference in the new logo is the addition of the feature (and the
esthetic/political sub-text issue of putting the feather in the elephants
nose). Font size can and will be adjusted. That adjustment will be done by
our art team in MapR if the circle logo concept is the accepted consensus.
My own view here is that consensus is at least as important as the precise
content. Adding new options tends to value small details in content over
consensus. I would prefer to not muddy the issue further.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, web service <wb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Can we still submit logos ?
>
> I encourage everyone who care about the logo to attach submissions to
> HADOOP-7020 (make sure you click grant rights to apache in the attach
> files form). As Ted said, the logos here are mostly thematic. The
> final version would be tweaked by a professional designer with
> input/ideas from all the submissions.
>
> > On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
> >> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
> >> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
> >> in height, where they are completely illegible.
> >>
> >> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
> >> the choices:
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
> >>
> >> Please find the larger version on
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
> >>
> >> __Luke
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > All,
> >> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them
> >> all on a page, here:
> >> >
> >> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >> >
> >> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> >> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> >> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >> >
> >> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >> >
> >> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> >> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> >> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >> >
> >> > -- Owen
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com>.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:43 PM, web service <wb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can we still submit logos ?
I encourage everyone who care about the logo to attach submissions to
HADOOP-7020 (make sure you click grant rights to apache in the attach
files form). As Ted said, the logos here are mostly thematic. The
final version would be tweaked by a professional designer with
input/ideas from all the submissions.
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com> wrote:
>
>> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
>> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
>> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
>> in height, where they are completely illegible.
>>
>> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
>> the choices:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
>>
>> Please find the larger version on
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
>>
>> __Luke
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > All,
>> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
>> all on a page, here:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>> >
>> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
>> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
>> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>> >
>> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>> >
>> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
>> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
>> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>> >
>> > -- Owen
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by web service <wb...@gmail.com>.
Can we still submit logos ?
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com> wrote:
> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
> in height, where they are completely illegible.
>
> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
> the choices:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
>
> Please find the larger version on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
>
> __Luke
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> > All,
> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Nichole Treadway <kn...@gmail.com>.
5, 6, 2, 4, 1, 3
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com> wrote:
> Keep in mind that it is thematic elements, not specific implementation that
> is being judged here.
>
> Many of these suggestions can be adapted to different font sizes depending
> on the desired final rendition
> size.
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com> wrote:
>
> > Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
> > disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
> > are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
> > in height, where they are completely illegible.
> >
> > I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
> > the choices:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
> >
> > Please find the larger version on
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
> >
> > __Luke
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > All,
> > > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them
> > all on a page, here:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> > >
> > > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> > thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> > >
> > > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> > >
> > > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> > don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> > will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> > >
> > > -- Owen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com>.
Agreed. My suggestion is essentially thematic as well, as the Apache
theme is mostly missing from the rest of the entries. My suggestion
emphasizes more on Apache and Hadoop rather than the proverbial
elephant.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com> wrote:
> Keep in mind that it is thematic elements, not specific implementation that
> is being judged here.
>
> Many of these suggestions can be adapted to different font sizes depending
> on the desired final rendition
> size.
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com> wrote:
>
>> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
>> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
>> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
>> in height, where they are completely illegible.
>>
>> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
>> the choices:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
>>
>> Please find the larger version on
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
>>
>> __Luke
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > All,
>> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
>> all on a page, here:
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>> >
>> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
>> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
>> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>> >
>> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>> >
>> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
>> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
>> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>> >
>> > -- Owen
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com>.
Keep in mind that it is thematic elements, not specific implementation that
is being judged here.
Many of these suggestions can be adapted to different font sizes depending
on the desired final rendition
size.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com> wrote:
> Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
> disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
> are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
> in height, where they are completely illegible.
>
> I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
> the choices:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
>
> Please find the larger version on
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
>
> __Luke
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> > All,
> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Luke Lu <ll...@vicaya.com>.
Just got a few minutes to look at these. I must say that I'm very
disappointed. Some of the choices are nice clip art but none of them
are appropriate for powered-by logos at typical logo size: <=64 pixels
in height, where they are completely illegible.
I present choice 0, which IMHO is a better candidate than the rest of
the choices:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12483197/pbh-64-logos.png
Please find the larger version on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7020
__Luke
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Jeff Hammerbacher <ha...@cloudera.com>.
5, 2.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Aaron T. Myers <at...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > How the long the vote is suppose to be running? Usual 72 hours? Or
> longer?
>
>
> http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html#Decision+Making
>
> From that page I assume that the time frame is 7 days, since the Hadoop
> bylaws mention no other length of time a vote may stay open.
>
> --
> Aaron T. Myers
> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by "Aaron T. Myers" <at...@cloudera.com>.
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 10:55 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> How the long the vote is suppose to be running? Usual 72 hours? Or longer?
http://hadoop.apache.org/bylaws.html#Decision+Making
>From that page I assume that the time frame is 7 days, since the Hadoop
bylaws mention no other length of time a vote may stay open.
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Daniel Jue <te...@gmail.com>.
Lots of the same bitstring:
4,2,6,1,3,5
out of 6 choose 6, 720 permutations.
Just Sayin.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> How the long the vote is suppose to be running? Usual 72 hours? Or longer?
>
> The up-to date vote results are here http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h
>
> Cos
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:19PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>> All,
>> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
>> all on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
>> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing
>> is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
>> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
How the long the vote is suppose to be running? Usual 72 hours? Or longer?
The up-to date vote results are here http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h
Cos
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:19PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing
> is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Matei Zaharia <ma...@eecs.berkeley.edu>.
5, 3, 2, 4, 6, 1
On Jun 15, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> My vote: 2, 4, 5
>
> -C
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>> All,
>> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Chris Douglas <cd...@apache.org>.
My vote: 2, 4, 5
-C
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
5, 4, 2, 6
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote
> will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
--
thanks
ashish
Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Ranjit Mathew <ra...@yahoo-inc.com>.
On 06/15/2011 08:49 AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
I think #4 modified slightly to make the elephant run on a wheel
or mill like the usual hamster-on-a-wheel thing would be perfect.
Ranjit
Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo
Posted by Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com>.
I would propose that the core be specified with some look and feel
flexibility.
Logo 2, for instance, is basically the same logo as log 4 except for font
changes and the circle. If we consider the circle to be totally optional
and intended just to make the logo fit in with the rest of the site, then
the basic idea of *that* yellow elephant with *those* words can be the
definition.
How does that sound? I am happy to have an artist produce some variants on
logo 2 that have
a) larger font
b) various sizes
Would that be useful?
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Ian Holsman <ha...@holsman.net> wrote:
> Is there a reason we can't have 2 powered by logo's that vendors etc can
> choose from?
>
> On Jun 25, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> > Owen,
> >
> > looks like your non-PMC list doesn't account for about 13 or so user
> votes
> > (which we cast under different subjects and making total number of #4
> equals
> > 37) as you can see here http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h
> >
> > Hope it helps
> > Cos
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:35AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> >> Ok,
> >> I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that method
> missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it changed the
> outcome.
> >>
> >> With the binding votes from the PMC:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> First Round
> >> 2 4
> >> 4 4
> >> 5 6
> >> 6 1
> >> Second Round (Drop 6)
> >> 2 5
> >> 4 4
> >> 5 6
> >> Third Round (Drop 4)
> >> 2 8
> >> 5 7
> >>
> >>
> >> So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are attached
> below, show the counted votes.
> >>
> >> With all of the binding and non-binding votes:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> First Round
> >> 1 1
> >> 2 13
> >> 4 23
> >> 5 27
> >> 6 4
> >> Second Round(Drop 1)
> >> 2 13
> >> 4 23
> >> 5 27
> >> 6 5
> >> Third Round (Drop 6)
> >> 2 15
> >> 4 24
> >> 5 29
> >> Forth Round (Drop 2)
> >> 4 35
> >> 5 31
> >>
> >>
> >> -- Owen
> >>
>
>
Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo
Posted by Ian Holsman <ha...@holsman.net>.
Is there a reason we can't have 2 powered by logo's that vendors etc can choose from?
On Jun 25, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Owen,
>
> looks like your non-PMC list doesn't account for about 13 or so user votes
> (which we cast under different subjects and making total number of #4 equals
> 37) as you can see here http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h
>
> Hope it helps
> Cos
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:35AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>> Ok,
>> I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that method missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it changed the outcome.
>>
>> With the binding votes from the PMC:
>>
>>
>>
>> First Round
>> 2 4
>> 4 4
>> 5 6
>> 6 1
>> Second Round (Drop 6)
>> 2 5
>> 4 4
>> 5 6
>> Third Round (Drop 4)
>> 2 8
>> 5 7
>>
>>
>> So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are attached below, show the counted votes.
>>
>> With all of the binding and non-binding votes:
>>
>>
>>
>> First Round
>> 1 1
>> 2 13
>> 4 23
>> 5 27
>> 6 4
>> Second Round(Drop 1)
>> 2 13
>> 4 23
>> 5 27
>> 6 5
>> Third Round (Drop 6)
>> 2 15
>> 4 24
>> 5 29
>> Forth Round (Drop 2)
>> 4 35
>> 5 31
>>
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
Owen,
looks like your non-PMC list doesn't account for about 13 or so user votes
(which we cast under different subjects and making total number of #4 equals
37) as you can see here http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h
Hope it helps
Cos
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:35AM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Ok,
> I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that method missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it changed the outcome.
>
> With the binding votes from the PMC:
>
>
>
> First Round
> 2 4
> 4 4
> 5 6
> 6 1
> Second Round (Drop 6)
> 2 5
> 4 4
> 5 6
> Third Round (Drop 4)
> 2 8
> 5 7
>
>
> So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are attached below, show the counted votes.
>
> With all of the binding and non-binding votes:
>
>
>
> First Round
> 1 1
> 2 13
> 4 23
> 5 27
> 6 4
> Second Round(Drop 1)
> 2 13
> 4 23
> 5 27
> 6 5
> Third Round (Drop 6)
> 2 15
> 4 24
> 5 29
> Forth Round (Drop 2)
> 4 35
> 5 31
>
>
> -- Owen
>
Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo
Posted by Mag Gam <ma...@gmail.com>.
5,6,3
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 24/06/11 17:54, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
>>>
>>> Off list I said I thought any of the logos were acceptable choices
>>> modulo some design tweaks, and that if the circle logo concept is
>>> accepted it would be good to adjust the circle itself. But the PMC
>>> did not vote for the circle logo, so it's a mute point.
>>
>> Clearly the PMC is full of circle-phobes.
>>
>
> it's why I work in a cube
>
Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>.
On 24/06/11 17:54, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>
> On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
>>
>> Off list I said I thought any of the logos were acceptable choices
>> modulo some design tweaks, and that if the circle logo concept is
>> accepted it would be good to adjust the circle itself. But the PMC
>> did not vote for the circle logo, so it's a mute point.
>
> Clearly the PMC is full of circle-phobes.
>
it's why I work in a cube
Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo
Posted by Allen Wittenauer <aw...@apache.org>.
On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Eli Collins wrote:
>
> Off list I said I thought any of the logos were acceptable choices
> modulo some design tweaks, and that if the circle logo concept is
> accepted it would be good to adjust the circle itself. But the PMC
> did not vote for the circle logo, so it's a mute point.
Clearly the PMC is full of circle-phobes.
Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo
Posted by Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com>.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com> wrote:
> So there is a significant difference between the community of developers and
> the PMC here and we definitely don't really have a consensus.
>
> One good suggestion that I had was from Eli. It sounds to me like his
> objection (and possibly related objections) to the logo that I proposed was
> based on the fact that the logo that I proposed matched the color scheme on
> our web site. In a side conversation (that obviously didn't officially
> happen, being off-list), it seemed that he would be willing to push for
> support for a logo with more flexibility in the way that core logo is
> encircled.
>
Hey Ted,
Off list I said I thought any of the logos were acceptable choices
modulo some design tweaks, and that if the circle logo concept is
accepted it would be good to adjust the circle itself. But the PMC
did not vote for the circle logo, so it's a mute point.
Thanks,
Eli
Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo
Posted by Ted Dunning <td...@maprtech.com>.
So there is a significant difference between the community of developers and
the PMC here and we definitely don't really have a consensus.
One good suggestion that I had was from Eli. It sounds to me like his
objection (and possibly related objections) to the logo that I proposed was
based on the fact that the logo that I proposed matched the color scheme on
our web site. In a side conversation (that obviously didn't officially
happen, being off-list), it seemed that he would be willing to push for
support for a logo with more flexibility in the way that core logo is
encircled.
In our conversation, it seems that a significant portion of the divergence
of opinion may simply be that different groups are attuned to their own
company or local community color palettes which makes logos tuned to other
color combinations much less attractive.
How about we have a logo family where the yellow elephant and "Powered by"
text is the core and the circle or its graphical equivalent is optional?
The intent would be to allow designers the freedom to help the logo conform
to their local look while maintaining a core identity?
Can we get consensus around that?
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok,
> I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that method
> missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it changed the
> outcome.
>
> With the binding votes from the PMC:
>
>
>
> First Round 2 4 4 4 5 6 6 1 Second Round (Drop 6) 2 5 4 4 5 6 Third
> Round (Drop 4) 2 8 5 7
>
> So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are attached
> below, show the counted votes.
>
> With all of the binding and non-binding votes:
>
>
>
> First Round 1 1 2 13 4 23 5 27 6 4 Second Round(Drop 1) 2 13 4
> 23 5 27 6 5 Third Round (Drop 6) 2 15 4 24 5 29 Forth Round
> (Drop 2) 4 35 5 31
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [RESULT] Powered by Logo
Posted by "Aaron T. Myers" <at...@cloudera.com>.
I independently counted all of the votes as well and came to the same
conclusions that Owen did. Even considering those who voted with a different
subject line, the outcome was indeed the same.
Thanks to all who participated!
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:35 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ok,
> I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that method
> missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it changed the
> outcome.
>
> With the binding votes from the PMC:
>
>
>
> First Round 2 4 4 4 5 6 6 1 Second Round (Drop 6) 2 5 4 4 5 6 Third
> Round (Drop 4) 2 8 5 7
>
> So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are attached
> below, show the counted votes.
>
> With all of the binding and non-binding votes:
>
>
>
> First Round 1 1 2 13 4 23 5 27 6 4 Second Round(Drop 1) 2 13 4
> 23 5 27 6 5 Third Round (Drop 6) 2 15 4 24 5 29 Forth Round
> (Drop 2) 4 35 5 31
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
>
>
[RESULT] Powered by Logo
Posted by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>.
Ok,
I collated the votes filtering on the subject line. I know that method missed some of the non-binding votes, but I don't believe it changed the outcome.
With the binding votes from the PMC:
First Round
2 4
4 4
5 6
6 1
Second Round (Drop 6)
2 5
4 4
5 6
Third Round (Drop 4)
2 8
5 7
So in the very close race, #2 wins. My spreadsheets, which are attached below, show the counted votes.
With all of the binding and non-binding votes:
First Round
1 1
2 13
4 23
5 27
6 4
Second Round(Drop 1)
2 13
4 23
5 27
6 5
Third Round (Drop 6)
2 15
4 24
5 29
Forth Round (Drop 2)
4 35
5 31
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
4,2,6,1,3,5
--
Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:19, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
I have put the votes together in a form of a spreadsheet
http://tinyurl.com/3j6629h
for the convenience of watching the race.
Statistics fascinates me usually. Stay tuned.
--
Take care,
Konstantin (Cos) Boudnik
2CAC 8312 4870 D885 8616 6115 220F 6980 1F27 E622
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this email are those of the author,
and do not necessarily represent the views of any company the author
might be affiliated with at the moment of writing.
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 20:19, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Ian Holsman <ha...@holsman.net>.
5,4,2,3,6,1
On Jun 15, 2011, at 1:19 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>.
On Jun 15, 2011, at 9:58 AM, Aaron T. Myers wrote:
> On that note, is it the case that the outcome of this vote is to adopt the
> "style" of the winning option? Or the precise pixels? I assume the former.
It is about the style. Technically, it would require a vote to replace the precise pixels, but usually two alternatives in the same style one is clearly better and we can make the decision without an explicit vote.
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by "Aaron T. Myers" <at...@cloudera.com>.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> Ted has offered to make a more polished version of 4, if there is interest
> in adopting it.
>
On that note, is it the case that the outcome of this vote is to adopt the
"style" of the winning option? Or the precise pixels? I assume the former.
I ask because when posting option #5 on the original JIRA, Aaron Newton also
posted a variant optimized for very small treatments:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12458850/powered-by-hadoop-small.png
--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Simone Leo <si...@crs4.it>.
I only like 4. A more polished version would be great. Maybe with
"Hadoop" instead of "Apache Hadoop". And maybe with a different font :)
On 06/15/11 16:35, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote:
>
>> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in 4.
>
> Ted has offered to make a more polished version of 4, if there is interest in adopting it.
>
> -- Owen
--
Simone Leo
Data Fusion - Distributed Computing
CRS4
POLARIS - Building #1
Piscina Manna
I-09010 Pula (CA) - Italy
e-mail: simone.leo@crs4.it
http://www.crs4.it
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>.
On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:57 PM, Daniel Jue wrote:
> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in 4.
Ted has offered to make a more polished version of 4, if there is interest in adopting it.
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Aaron Kimball <ak...@gmail.com>.
5 4 2 6 3 1
- Aaron
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Daniel Jue <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My vote:
>
> 5,4,3,2,6,1
>
> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant
> in 4.
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Subhash Gopinath <sg...@maprtech.com>.
4, 2, 6
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Peter Conrad <pc...@maprtech.com>.
4, 2, 6, 1, 3, 5
On 06/15/2011 11:54 AM, Bartosz Solowiej wrote:
> 2, 4
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Bochun Bai<bb...@bbcn.name> wrote:
>
>> 6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Jue<te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> My vote:
>>>
>>> 5,4,3,2,6,1
>>>
>>> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant
>> in 4.
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Todd Papaioannou <to...@yahoo-inc.com>.
2, 4, 5, 3, 6, 1
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Bartosz Solowiej <to...@maprtech.com>.
2, 4
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Bochun Bai <bb...@bbcn.name> wrote:
> 6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Jue <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > My vote:
> >
> > 5,4,3,2,6,1
> >
> > IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant
> in 4.
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Bochun Bai <bb...@bbcn.name>.
6, 4, 5, 2, 1, 3
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Jue <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My vote:
>
> 5,4,3,2,6,1
>
> IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in 4.
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Daniel Jue <te...@gmail.com>.
My vote:
5,4,3,2,6,1
IMO, 5 is much more polished than the rest, but I like the whole elephant in 4.
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Bijeet Singh <bi...@gmail.com>.
5, 4, 6, 2, 3, 1
Cheers,
Bijeet
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:49 AM
> > To: general@hadoop.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
> >
> > All,
> > We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> > all on a page, here:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >
> > Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> > voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing
> > is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >
> > My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >
> > In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't
> > need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> > automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >
> > -- Owen
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
4,3,5,6,2,1
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Jithendranath
<ji...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> 4,2,6,1,5,3
>
> :)
>
> -- Joijoide
>
> ****************************************************************************
> ***********
> This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI,
> which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
> above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including,
> but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or
> dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is
> prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by
> phone or email immediately and delete it!
>
> ________________________________
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:49 AM
> To: general@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
>
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing
> is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Dmitriy Ryaboy <dv...@gmail.com>.
2 6 5 1 4 3
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Anupam Seth <an...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> My vote:
>
> 5, 4, 1, 6, 2, 3
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Naisbitt [mailto:jnaisbit@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:44 AM
> To: general@hadoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
>
> My vote: 4,5,1,2,6,3
> --Jeff
>
>
> On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> All,
>> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>> on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
>> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
>> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
>> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Anupam Seth <an...@yahoo-inc.com>.
My vote:
5, 4, 1, 6, 2, 3
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Naisbitt [mailto:jnaisbit@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:44 AM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
My vote: 4,5,1,2,6,3
--Jeff
On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Mahadev Konar <ma...@apache.org>.
2, 4, 6.
mahadev
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote:
> 5, 6, 1, 3, 4, 2
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Suresh Srinivas
> <su...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>> 2, 4
>>
>>
>> On 6/14/11 8:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>>> on a page, here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>>
>>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
>>> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
>>> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>>
>>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>>
>>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
>>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
>>> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>>
>>> -- Owen
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
thanks
mahadev
@mahadevkonar
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org>.
5, 6, 1, 3, 4, 2
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Suresh Srinivas
<su...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> 2, 4
>
>
> On 6/14/11 8:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> All,
>> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>> on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
>> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
>> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
>> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Henry Robinson <he...@cloudera.com>.
5 2 1 3 6 4
On 15 June 2011 08:54, Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> My vote 5 3 6 1 2 4
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Thomas Graves <tg...@yahoo-inc.com>
> wrote:
> > My vote: 4,5,1,2,3,6
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put
> them all
> >> on a page, here:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >>
> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting,
> >> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is
> >> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >>
> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >>
> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't
> >> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> >> automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >>
> >> -- Owen
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
--
Henry Robinson
Software Engineer
Cloudera
415-994-6679
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com>.
My vote 5 3 6 1 2 4
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Thomas Graves <tg...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
> My vote: 4,5,1,2,3,6
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> All,
>> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>> on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
>> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
>> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
>> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Suresh Srinivas <su...@yahoo-inc.com>.
2, 4
On 6/14/11 8:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Jeffrey Naisbitt <jn...@yahoo-inc.com>.
My vote: 4,5,1,2,6,3
--Jeff
On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Thomas Graves <tg...@yahoo-inc.com>.
My vote: 4,5,1,2,3,6
Tom
On 6/14/11 10:19 PM, "Owen O'Malley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Jithendranath <ji...@huawei.com>.
4,2,6,1,5,3
:)
-- Joijoide
****************************************************************************
***********
This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI,
which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed
above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including,
but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or
dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is
prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by
phone or email immediately and delete it!
________________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: Owen O'Malley [mailto:omalley@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:49 AM
To: general@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
All,
We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
all on a page, here:
http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
voting, let's use single transferable vote ( STV
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing
is to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
automatically roll over to your next choice.
-- Owen
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Chad Metcalf <ch...@cloudera.com>.
5,2
Cheers
Chad
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Jeff Bean <jw...@cloudera.com>.
5,6,2,4,3,1
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Eric Baldeschwieler
<er...@yahoo-inc.com>wrote:
> 5,2
>
> > On 6/15/11 8:49 AM, "Owen O'Malley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them
> all
> >> on a page, here:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
> >>
> >> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of
> voting,
> >> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important
> thing is
> >> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
> >>
> >> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
> >>
> >> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you
> don't
> >> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> >> automatically roll over to your next choice.
> >>
> >> -- Owen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Eric Baldeschwieler <er...@yahoo-inc.com>.
5,2
> On 6/15/11 8:49 AM, "Owen O'Malley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> All,
>> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
>> on a page, here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>>
>> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
>> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
>> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>>
>> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>>
>> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
>> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
>> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>>
>> -- Owen
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Powered by Logo
Posted by Venkatesh S <sv...@yahoo-inc.com>.
My vote: 4, 3, 2, 6, 5, 1
Thanks,
Venkatesh
On 6/15/11 8:49 AM, "Owen O'Malley" <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> All,
> We've had a wide range of entries for a powered by logo. I've put them all
> on a page, here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~omalley/hadoop-powered-by/
>
> Since there are a lot of contenders and we only want a single round of voting,
> let's use single transferable vote ( STV
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_transferable_vote). The important thing is
> to pick the images *IN ORDER* that you would like them.
>
> My vote (in order of course): 4, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6.
>
> In other words, I want option 4 most and option 6 least. With STV, you don't
> need to worry about voting for an unpopular choice since your vote will
> automatically roll over to your next choice.
>
> -- Owen
>
>
>