You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by Bin Zhu <lu...@gmail.com> on 2014/10/09 11:06:28 UTC
EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
Hi,
Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes, is there
requirement for EJB container? any additional configuration needed for
application server? Thanks.
Spec for EJB support:
In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the use of
stateless and singleton session
beans as root resource classes, providers and Application subclasses.
Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
Posted by Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>.
Hi Andriy
On 09/10/14 15:25, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
> Hi Sergei,
>
> I am curious how Jersey and Resteasy fulfil this requirement.
> Are they rely on some container specific code for EJB integration?
>
I'd say so, they will likely have the container specific bootstrapping
mechanism in place. May be Bill can confirm :-) That is why it is not
really possible to ship a generic CXF EJB integration code but a single
invoker.
We can refer people to TomEE for a concrete CXF EJB integration in
action and consider shipping a single file really, an EJB aware invoker
that other integrators might want to use when doing their own CXF JAX-RS
EJB integrations.
Cheers, Sergey
> Regards,
> Andrei.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyozkin@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2014 15:20
>> To: users@cxf.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
>>
>> Hi Andy
>> On 09/10/14 13:55, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
>>> I don't want to hijack the thread, but feel like I need to mention
>>> Apache TomEE.
>>>
>> no problems at all, welcome :-)
>>> The 1.7.x version has this set-up out of the box, and provides a
>>> lightweight app-server that includes OpenEJB (EJB 3.1) and CXF
>>> (2.6.14) The trunk version (2.0.0-SNAPSHOT) has been upgraded to use
>>> CXF 3.x
>>>
>>> May save you some work.
>> I did refer to TomEE in my original response in this thread and happy to refer to
>> TomEE whenever I can. TomEE is a top complete container.
>>
>> The thing is we start seeing non TomEE users thinking of integrating CXF into
>> their containers. Hence it might make sense to offer something pretty light-
>> weight at a CXF level. This is something Andriy did around CDI so that say
>> Tomcat users can have CDI utilized.
>>
>> To be honest I'm not sure if it is even feasible to offer something pretty light-
>> weight at the CXF level alone, if it were then I'd say it would be limited to
>> shipping some EJB aware invoker only...The rest would likely have to be done at
>> the specific container level...
>>
>> Thanks, Sergey
>>
>>>
>>> Andy.
>>>
>>> On 09/10/2014 13:51, Andrey Redko wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Following Sergey's e-mail, it is true, CXF does not have support for EJB
>>>> resource classes yet.
>>>> The work has been done to support CDI 1.1. That's being said, if the
>>>> EJB container integrates with CDI container (it should), the CXF can
>>>> be used and is going to work as expected.
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Andriy Redko
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sergey Beryozkin
>>>> <sb...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes,
>>>>>> is there requirement for EJB container? any additional
>>>>>> configuration needed for application server? Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Spec for EJB support:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the
>>>>>> use of stateless and singleton session beans as root resource
>>>>>> classes, providers and Application subclasses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, CXF does not have its own EJB integration project in place
>>>>>> yet. CDI
>>>>> - yes, Andriy Redko did it. TomEE has it AFAIK.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was a GSOC project few years back dedicated to it but it was
>>>>> not completed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Might be worth having a light-weight CXF JAX-RS 2.0 EJB integration
>>>>> project as well, that would have CXF offering a complete integration
>>>>> support...
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Sergey
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
Posted by Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>.
Hi Andriy
On 09/10/14 15:25, Andrei Shakirin wrote:
> Hi Sergei,
>
> I am curious how Jersey and Resteasy fulfil this requirement.
> Are they rely on some container specific code for EJB integration?
>
I'd say so, they will likely have the container specific bootstrapping
mechanism in place. May be Bill can confirm :-) That is why it is not
really possible to ship a generic CXF EJB integration code but a single
invoker.
We can refer people to TomEE for a concrete CXF EJB integration in
action and consider shipping a single file really, an EJB aware invoker
that other integrators might want to use when doing their own CXF JAX-RS
EJB integrations.
Cheers, Sergey
> Regards,
> Andrei.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyozkin@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2014 15:20
>> To: users@cxf.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
>>
>> Hi Andy
>> On 09/10/14 13:55, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
>>> I don't want to hijack the thread, but feel like I need to mention
>>> Apache TomEE.
>>>
>> no problems at all, welcome :-)
>>> The 1.7.x version has this set-up out of the box, and provides a
>>> lightweight app-server that includes OpenEJB (EJB 3.1) and CXF
>>> (2.6.14) The trunk version (2.0.0-SNAPSHOT) has been upgraded to use
>>> CXF 3.x
>>>
>>> May save you some work.
>> I did refer to TomEE in my original response in this thread and happy to refer to
>> TomEE whenever I can. TomEE is a top complete container.
>>
>> The thing is we start seeing non TomEE users thinking of integrating CXF into
>> their containers. Hence it might make sense to offer something pretty light-
>> weight at a CXF level. This is something Andriy did around CDI so that say
>> Tomcat users can have CDI utilized.
>>
>> To be honest I'm not sure if it is even feasible to offer something pretty light-
>> weight at the CXF level alone, if it were then I'd say it would be limited to
>> shipping some EJB aware invoker only...The rest would likely have to be done at
>> the specific container level...
>>
>> Thanks, Sergey
>>
>>>
>>> Andy.
>>>
>>> On 09/10/2014 13:51, Andrey Redko wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Following Sergey's e-mail, it is true, CXF does not have support for EJB
>>>> resource classes yet.
>>>> The work has been done to support CDI 1.1. That's being said, if the
>>>> EJB container integrates with CDI container (it should), the CXF can
>>>> be used and is going to work as expected.
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Andriy Redko
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sergey Beryozkin
>>>> <sb...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes,
>>>>>> is there requirement for EJB container? any additional
>>>>>> configuration needed for application server? Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Spec for EJB support:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the
>>>>>> use of stateless and singleton session beans as root resource
>>>>>> classes, providers and Application subclasses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, CXF does not have its own EJB integration project in place
>>>>>> yet. CDI
>>>>> - yes, Andriy Redko did it. TomEE has it AFAIK.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was a GSOC project few years back dedicated to it but it was
>>>>> not completed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Might be worth having a light-weight CXF JAX-RS 2.0 EJB integration
>>>>> project as well, that would have CXF offering a complete integration
>>>>> support...
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers, Sergey
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
RE: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
Posted by Andrei Shakirin <as...@talend.com>.
Hi Sergei,
I am curious how Jersey and Resteasy fulfil this requirement.
Are they rely on some container specific code for EJB integration?
Regards,
Andrei.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sergey Beryozkin [mailto:sberyozkin@gmail.com]
> Sent: Donnerstag, 9. Oktober 2014 15:20
> To: users@cxf.apache.org
> Subject: Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
>
> Hi Andy
> On 09/10/14 13:55, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> > I don't want to hijack the thread, but feel like I need to mention
> > Apache TomEE.
> >
> no problems at all, welcome :-)
> > The 1.7.x version has this set-up out of the box, and provides a
> > lightweight app-server that includes OpenEJB (EJB 3.1) and CXF
> > (2.6.14) The trunk version (2.0.0-SNAPSHOT) has been upgraded to use
> > CXF 3.x
> >
> > May save you some work.
> I did refer to TomEE in my original response in this thread and happy to refer to
> TomEE whenever I can. TomEE is a top complete container.
>
> The thing is we start seeing non TomEE users thinking of integrating CXF into
> their containers. Hence it might make sense to offer something pretty light-
> weight at a CXF level. This is something Andriy did around CDI so that say
> Tomcat users can have CDI utilized.
>
> To be honest I'm not sure if it is even feasible to offer something pretty light-
> weight at the CXF level alone, if it were then I'd say it would be limited to
> shipping some EJB aware invoker only...The rest would likely have to be done at
> the specific container level...
>
> Thanks, Sergey
>
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> > On 09/10/2014 13:51, Andrey Redko wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Following Sergey's e-mail, it is true, CXF does not have support for EJB
> >> resource classes yet.
> >> The work has been done to support CDI 1.1. That's being said, if the
> >> EJB container integrates with CDI container (it should), the CXF can
> >> be used and is going to work as expected.
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Andriy Redko
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sergey Beryozkin
> >> <sb...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>> Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes,
> >>>> is there requirement for EJB container? any additional
> >>>> configuration needed for application server? Thanks.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Spec for EJB support:
> >>>>
> >>>> In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the
> >>>> use of stateless and singleton session beans as root resource
> >>>> classes, providers and Application subclasses.
> >>>>
> >>>> No, CXF does not have its own EJB integration project in place
> >>>> yet. CDI
> >>> - yes, Andriy Redko did it. TomEE has it AFAIK.
> >>>
> >>> There was a GSOC project few years back dedicated to it but it was
> >>> not completed.
> >>>
> >>> Might be worth having a light-weight CXF JAX-RS 2.0 EJB integration
> >>> project as well, that would have CXF offering a complete integration
> >>> support...
> >>>
> >>> Cheers, Sergey
> >>>
> >>>
> >
Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
Posted by Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>.
Hi Andy
On 09/10/14 13:55, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> I don't want to hijack the thread, but feel like I need to mention
> Apache TomEE.
>
no problems at all, welcome :-)
> The 1.7.x version has this set-up out of the box, and provides a
> lightweight app-server that includes OpenEJB (EJB 3.1) and CXF (2.6.14)
> The trunk version (2.0.0-SNAPSHOT) has been upgraded to use CXF 3.x
>
> May save you some work.
I did refer to TomEE in my original response in this thread and happy to
refer to TomEE whenever I can. TomEE is a top complete container.
The thing is we start seeing non TomEE users thinking of integrating CXF
into their containers. Hence it might make sense to offer something
pretty light-weight at a CXF level. This is something Andriy did around
CDI so that say Tomcat users can have CDI utilized.
To be honest I'm not sure if it is even feasible to offer something
pretty light-weight at the CXF level alone, if it were then I'd say it
would be limited to shipping some EJB aware invoker only...The rest
would likely have to be done at the specific container level...
Thanks, Sergey
>
> Andy.
>
> On 09/10/2014 13:51, Andrey Redko wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Following Sergey's e-mail, it is true, CXF does not have support for EJB
>> resource classes yet.
>> The work has been done to support CDI 1.1. That's being said, if the EJB
>> container integrates with CDI container (it should), the CXF can be used
>> and is going to work as expected.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Andriy Redko
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes, is
>>>> there
>>>> requirement for EJB container? any additional configuration needed for
>>>> application server? Thanks.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Spec for EJB support:
>>>>
>>>> In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the
>>>> use of
>>>> stateless and singleton session
>>>> beans as root resource classes, providers and Application subclasses.
>>>>
>>>> No, CXF does not have its own EJB integration project in place
>>>> yet. CDI
>>> - yes, Andriy Redko did it. TomEE has it AFAIK.
>>>
>>> There was a GSOC project few years back dedicated to it but it was not
>>> completed.
>>>
>>> Might be worth having a light-weight CXF JAX-RS 2.0 EJB integration
>>> project as well, that would have CXF offering a complete integration
>>> support...
>>>
>>> Cheers, Sergey
>>>
>>>
>
Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.
I don't want to hijack the thread, but feel like I need to mention
Apache TomEE.
The 1.7.x version has this set-up out of the box, and provides a
lightweight app-server that includes OpenEJB (EJB 3.1) and CXF (2.6.14)
The trunk version (2.0.0-SNAPSHOT) has been upgraded to use CXF 3.x
May save you some work.
Andy.
On 09/10/2014 13:51, Andrey Redko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following Sergey's e-mail, it is true, CXF does not have support for EJB
> resource classes yet.
> The work has been done to support CDI 1.1. That's being said, if the EJB
> container integrates with CDI container (it should), the CXF can be used
> and is going to work as expected.
> Thanks.
>
> Best Regards,
> Andriy Redko
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes, is
>>> there
>>> requirement for EJB container? any additional configuration needed for
>>> application server? Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> Spec for EJB support:
>>>
>>> In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the use of
>>> stateless and singleton session
>>> beans as root resource classes, providers and Application subclasses.
>>>
>>> No, CXF does not have its own EJB integration project in place yet. CDI
>> - yes, Andriy Redko did it. TomEE has it AFAIK.
>>
>> There was a GSOC project few years back dedicated to it but it was not
>> completed.
>>
>> Might be worth having a light-weight CXF JAX-RS 2.0 EJB integration
>> project as well, that would have CXF offering a complete integration
>> support...
>>
>> Cheers, Sergey
>>
>>
--
Andy Gumbrecht
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
http://www.tomitribe.com
Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Yes absolutely. TomEE supports CDI rest endpoints but also EJB endpoints.
Both are integrated and work together out of the box in TomEE.
Happy to hack on an hello world sample for you if you want.
jean Louis
Hi,
Following Sergey's e-mail, it is true, CXF does not have support for EJB
resource classes yet.
The work has been done to support CDI 1.1. That's being said, if the EJB
container integrates with CDI container (it should), the CXF can be used
and is going to work as expected.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes, is
>> there
>> requirement for EJB container? any additional configuration needed for
>> application server? Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Spec for EJB support:
>>
>> In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the use
of
>> stateless and singleton session
>> beans as root resource classes, providers and Application subclasses.
>>
>> No, CXF does not have its own EJB integration project in place yet. CDI
> - yes, Andriy Redko did it. TomEE has it AFAIK.
>
> There was a GSOC project few years back dedicated to it but it was not
> completed.
>
> Might be worth having a light-weight CXF JAX-RS 2.0 EJB integration
> project as well, that would have CXF offering a complete integration
> support...
>
> Cheers, Sergey
>
>
Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
Posted by Andrey Redko <dr...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Following Sergey's e-mail, it is true, CXF does not have support for EJB
resource classes yet.
The work has been done to support CDI 1.1. That's being said, if the EJB
container integrates with CDI container (it should), the CXF can be used
and is going to work as expected.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes, is
>> there
>> requirement for EJB container? any additional configuration needed for
>> application server? Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Spec for EJB support:
>>
>> In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the use of
>> stateless and singleton session
>> beans as root resource classes, providers and Application subclasses.
>>
>> No, CXF does not have its own EJB integration project in place yet. CDI
> - yes, Andriy Redko did it. TomEE has it AFAIK.
>
> There was a GSOC project few years back dedicated to it but it was not
> completed.
>
> Might be worth having a light-weight CXF JAX-RS 2.0 EJB integration
> project as well, that would have CXF offering a complete integration
> support...
>
> Cheers, Sergey
>
>
Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
Posted by Andrey Redko <dr...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Following Sergey's e-mail, it is true, CXF does not have support for EJB
resource classes yet.
The work has been done to support CDI 1.1. That's being said, if the EJB
container integrates with CDI container (it should), the CXF can be used
and is going to work as expected.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Andriy Redko
On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes, is
>> there
>> requirement for EJB container? any additional configuration needed for
>> application server? Thanks.
>>
>>
>> Spec for EJB support:
>>
>> In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the use of
>> stateless and singleton session
>> beans as root resource classes, providers and Application subclasses.
>>
>> No, CXF does not have its own EJB integration project in place yet. CDI
> - yes, Andriy Redko did it. TomEE has it AFAIK.
>
> There was a GSOC project few years back dedicated to it but it was not
> completed.
>
> Might be worth having a light-weight CXF JAX-RS 2.0 EJB integration
> project as well, that would have CXF offering a complete integration
> support...
>
> Cheers, Sergey
>
>
Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
Posted by Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>.
Hi
On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
> Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes, is there
> requirement for EJB container? any additional configuration needed for
> application server? Thanks.
>
>
> Spec for EJB support:
>
> In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the use of
> stateless and singleton session
> beans as root resource classes, providers and Application subclasses.
>
No, CXF does not have its own EJB integration project in place yet. CDI
- yes, Andriy Redko did it. TomEE has it AFAIK.
There was a GSOC project few years back dedicated to it but it was not
completed.
Might be worth having a light-weight CXF JAX-RS 2.0 EJB integration
project as well, that would have CXF offering a complete integration
support...
Cheers, Sergey
Re: EJB integration for JAX-RS2.0 in CXF
Posted by Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>.
Hi
On 09/10/14 10:06, Bin Zhu wrote:
> Hi,
> Does current CXF support EJB based JAX-RS 2.0 application? If yes, is there
> requirement for EJB container? any additional configuration needed for
> application server? Thanks.
>
>
> Spec for EJB support:
>
> In a product that supports EJBs, an implementation MUST support the use of
> stateless and singleton session
> beans as root resource classes, providers and Application subclasses.
>
No, CXF does not have its own EJB integration project in place yet. CDI
- yes, Andriy Redko did it. TomEE has it AFAIK.
There was a GSOC project few years back dedicated to it but it was not
completed.
Might be worth having a light-weight CXF JAX-RS 2.0 EJB integration
project as well, that would have CXF offering a complete integration
support...
Cheers, Sergey