You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cordova.apache.org by Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> on 2013/01/28 20:11:27 UTC
ship 2.4 monday
remember: silence is assent!
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>.
<silence>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Anis KADRI <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Simon MacDonald <
> simon.macdonald@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > +1
> > Simon Mac Donald
> > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Jesse <pu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 to Monday, Feb 4. Thanks for clarification.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Michael Brooks <
> > michael@michaelbrooks.ca
> > >> >wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > I haven't heard any major blockers, so Monday Feb 4th seems good.
> > >> >
> > >> > Michael
> > >> >
> > >> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Monday Feb 4th or w/e! Next week!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 1/28/13 11:25 AM, "Becky Gibson" <gi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >-1 if you mean Monday as in today?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >I'd like to see the mobile-spec issues resolved. I can't figure
> > out
> > >> why
> > >> > > >my
> > >> > > >mobile-spec file transfer fails and others do not. I suspect it
> > has
> > >> to
> > >> > do
> > >> > > >with the whitelist but am not certain.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> +1 silence
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> On 1/28/13 11:11 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> >remember: silence is assent!
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > @purplecabbage
> > > risingj.com
> >
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Anis KADRI <an...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Simon MacDonald <simon.macdonald@gmail.com
> wrote:
> +1
> Simon Mac Donald
> http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Jesse <pu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> +1 to Monday, Feb 4. Thanks for clarification.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Michael Brooks <
> michael@michaelbrooks.ca
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > I haven't heard any major blockers, so Monday Feb 4th seems good.
> >> >
> >> > Michael
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Monday Feb 4th or w/e! Next week!
> >> > >
> >> > > On 1/28/13 11:25 AM, "Becky Gibson" <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >-1 if you mean Monday as in today?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >I'd like to see the mobile-spec issues resolved. I can't figure
> out
> >> why
> >> > > >my
> >> > > >mobile-spec file transfer fails and others do not. I suspect it
> has
> >> to
> >> > do
> >> > > >with the whitelist but am not certain.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> +1 silence
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On 1/28/13 11:11 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> >remember: silence is assent!
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > @purplecabbage
> > risingj.com
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Simon MacDonald <si...@gmail.com>.
+1
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Jesse <pu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Becky Gibson <gi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> +1 to Monday, Feb 4. Thanks for clarification.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Michael Brooks <michael@michaelbrooks.ca
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > I haven't heard any major blockers, so Monday Feb 4th seems good.
>> >
>> > Michael
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Monday Feb 4th or w/e! Next week!
>> > >
>> > > On 1/28/13 11:25 AM, "Becky Gibson" <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >-1 if you mean Monday as in today?
>> > > >
>> > > >I'd like to see the mobile-spec issues resolved. I can't figure out
>> why
>> > > >my
>> > > >mobile-spec file transfer fails and others do not. I suspect it has
>> to
>> > do
>> > > >with the whitelist but am not certain.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> +1 silence
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 1/28/13 11:11 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> >remember: silence is assent!
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Jesse <pu...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Becky Gibson <gi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> +1 to Monday, Feb 4. Thanks for clarification.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Michael Brooks <michael@michaelbrooks.ca
> >wrote:
>
> > I haven't heard any major blockers, so Monday Feb 4th seems good.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Monday Feb 4th or w/e! Next week!
> > >
> > > On 1/28/13 11:25 AM, "Becky Gibson" <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >-1 if you mean Monday as in today?
> > > >
> > > >I'd like to see the mobile-spec issues resolved. I can't figure out
> why
> > > >my
> > > >mobile-spec file transfer fails and others do not. I suspect it has
> to
> > do
> > > >with the whitelist but am not certain.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1 silence
> > > >>
> > > >> On 1/28/13 11:11 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >remember: silence is assent!
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
--
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Becky Gibson <gi...@gmail.com>.
+1 to Monday, Feb 4. Thanks for clarification.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Michael Brooks <mi...@michaelbrooks.ca>wrote:
> I haven't heard any major blockers, so Monday Feb 4th seems good.
>
> Michael
>
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Monday Feb 4th or w/e! Next week!
> >
> > On 1/28/13 11:25 AM, "Becky Gibson" <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >-1 if you mean Monday as in today?
> > >
> > >I'd like to see the mobile-spec issues resolved. I can't figure out why
> > >my
> > >mobile-spec file transfer fails and others do not. I suspect it has to
> do
> > >with the whitelist but am not certain.
> > >
> > >
> > >On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 silence
> > >>
> > >> On 1/28/13 11:11 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >remember: silence is assent!
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Michael Brooks <mi...@michaelbrooks.ca>.
I haven't heard any major blockers, so Monday Feb 4th seems good.
Michael
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Monday Feb 4th or w/e! Next week!
>
> On 1/28/13 11:25 AM, "Becky Gibson" <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >-1 if you mean Monday as in today?
> >
> >I'd like to see the mobile-spec issues resolved. I can't figure out why
> >my
> >mobile-spec file transfer fails and others do not. I suspect it has to do
> >with the whitelist but am not certain.
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 silence
> >>
> >> On 1/28/13 11:11 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >>
> >> >remember: silence is assent!
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Monday Feb 4th or w/e! Next week!
On 1/28/13 11:25 AM, "Becky Gibson" <gi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>-1 if you mean Monday as in today?
>
>I'd like to see the mobile-spec issues resolved. I can't figure out why
>my
>mobile-spec file transfer fails and others do not. I suspect it has to do
>with the whitelist but am not certain.
>
>
>On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 silence
>>
>> On 1/28/13 11:11 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>
>> >remember: silence is assent!
>>
>>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Becky Gibson <gi...@gmail.com>.
-1 if you mean Monday as in today?
I'd like to see the mobile-spec issues resolved. I can't figure out why my
mobile-spec file transfer fails and others do not. I suspect it has to do
with the whitelist but am not certain.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> +1 silence
>
> On 1/28/13 11:11 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>
> >remember: silence is assent!
>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>.
Here's the whitelist that I've been using. Not sure even where I came up
with it:
<access origin="*apache.org*"/>
<access origin="audio.ibeat.org*"/>
<access origin="cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com*"/>
<access origin="whatheaders.com*"/>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Becky Gibson <gi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks, Andrew.
>
> I'm still having problems with the FileTransfer mobile spec tests. Based
> on what I see in the fileTransfer.tests.js file, I set my whitelist to the
> following in config.xml:
>
> <access origin="http://www.google.com" />
>
> <access origin="http://www.apache.org" subdomains="false"/>
>
> <access origin="https://www.apache.org" />
>
> <access origin="http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com" />
>
> <access origin="http://whatheaders.com" />
>
> The goole reference is for the inAppBrowser tests.
>
> With this whitelist I get two failures both relating to unknown host
> testing:
>
> File Transfer download method should handle unknown host - the uploadWin
> success method is being called when it should not be. This is trying to
> download from "http://foobar.apache.org/index.html"; which should be
> rejected because of the subdomains="false" in the apache.org white list
> settings.
>
> I also get File Transfer upload method should handle unknown host error as
> well with the same error that 'uploadWin' should not have been called.
> Interestingly the whitelist error is caught but is returned in the success
> callback as the response.
>
> Now, if I remove the change to fix CB-2235 (
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-ios.git;a=commit;h=db22768362823bf6f84cbaead6c03dd1764f60b2
> )
> all of the FileTransfer tests pass.
>
>
> FWIW if I leave the whitelist wide open, I still get the FileTransfer
> download method should handle unknown host error that uploadWin is getting
> called - which probably makes sense since the subdomain to apache is
> allowed. However, I do not get the upload method should handle unknown
> host error which I think I should get!!
>
> Thus,
>
> 1) either my whitelist is incorrect
>
> 2) the fix is incorrect
>
> 3) the tests are incorrect
>
> 4) I am totally lost! (reading jasmine tests is not one of my strong
> suits)
>
> I am not an http headers guru so it will take me awhile to fully grok the
> file transfer code to determine the problem.
>
> -becky
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Okay, tagged JS, iOS, Android.
> >
> >
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2-src.zip
> >
> >
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-js.zip
> >
> >
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-ios.zip
> >
> >
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-android.zip
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:35 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Agree
> > >
> > > _____________________
> > > Fabian Boulegue
> > > tea inc.
> > > CEO - Founder
> > > Meierbrede 9
> > > 33100 Paderborn
> > >
> > > Mobile
> > >
> > > Am 29.01.2013 um 23:43 schrieb Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Ah I get it now (Andrew's list of significant iOS commits) I suppose
> we
> > > > could internally tag an rc2 (not public release) and test the heck
> out
> > of
> > > > it. Those iOS changes are critical bug fixes since rc1.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org
> >
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Okay, that wasn't entirely clear...
> > > >>
> > > >> I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android,
> > > since
> > > >> most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree?
> > > >>
> > > >> Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should
> > > generally
> > > >> expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Andrew: sounds great.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those
> > > >>> commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
> > > >>>
> > > >>> (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <
> agrieve@chromium.org
> > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>> I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <
> > gibson.becky@gmail.com
> > > >>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working
> > off
> > > >> the
> > > >>>>> same version
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <
> fboulegue@me.com
> > >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it
> in
> > a
> > > >>> small
> > > >>>>>> group...?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> _____________________
> > > >>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> > > >>>>>> tea inc.
> > > >>>>>> CEO - Founder
> > > >>>>>> Meierbrede 9
> > > >>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Mobile
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various
> > > >>> committers in
> > > >>>>>>> transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0
> > on
> > > >>>>>> Monday?
> > > >>>>>>>> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> -Steve
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
> > > >>>>>>>> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Changes of note:
> > > >>>>>>>>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
> > > >>>>>>>>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a
> plugin
> > > >>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
> > > >>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that
> warrant
> > > >> an
> > > >>>>> rc2.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with
> > the
> > > >>> iOS
> > > >>>>>>>>> repo
> > > >>>>>>>>>> recently (at least more than I have).
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been
> tested
> > > >>> here,
> > > >>>>>>>>> about
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> the known issues.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> So we would stay on time.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> _____________________
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> tea inc.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
> > > >>>>>>>>> releasing
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.0.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <
> agrieve@chromium.org>
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think
> > this
> > > >>>>> would
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> warrant
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> an rc2.
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <
> fil@adobe.com
> > >
> > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless
> > > >>> contributors
> > > >>>>>>>>> and
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left
> > over
> > > >>>>>>>>> from, or
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fboulegue@me.com
> >
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io>
> wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
> > > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Becky Gibson <gi...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Andrew.
I'm still having problems with the FileTransfer mobile spec tests. Based
on what I see in the fileTransfer.tests.js file, I set my whitelist to the
following in config.xml:
<access origin="http://www.google.com" />
<access origin="http://www.apache.org" subdomains="false"/>
<access origin="https://www.apache.org" />
<access origin="http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com" />
<access origin="http://whatheaders.com" />
The goole reference is for the inAppBrowser tests.
With this whitelist I get two failures both relating to unknown host
testing:
File Transfer download method should handle unknown host - the uploadWin
success method is being called when it should not be. This is trying to
download from "http://foobar.apache.org/index.html"; which should be
rejected because of the subdomains="false" in the apache.org white list
settings.
I also get File Transfer upload method should handle unknown host error as
well with the same error that 'uploadWin' should not have been called.
Interestingly the whitelist error is caught but is returned in the success
callback as the response.
Now, if I remove the change to fix CB-2235 (
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-ios.git;a=commit;h=db22768362823bf6f84cbaead6c03dd1764f60b2)
all of the FileTransfer tests pass.
FWIW if I leave the whitelist wide open, I still get the FileTransfer
download method should handle unknown host error that uploadWin is getting
called - which probably makes sense since the subdomain to apache is
allowed. However, I do not get the upload method should handle unknown
host error which I think I should get!!
Thus,
1) either my whitelist is incorrect
2) the fix is incorrect
3) the tests are incorrect
4) I am totally lost! (reading jasmine tests is not one of my strong suits)
I am not an http headers guru so it will take me awhile to fully grok the
file transfer code to determine the problem.
-becky
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
> Okay, tagged JS, iOS, Android.
>
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2-src.zip
>
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-js.zip
>
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-ios.zip
>
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-android.zip
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:35 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Agree
> >
> > _____________________
> > Fabian Boulegue
> > tea inc.
> > CEO - Founder
> > Meierbrede 9
> > 33100 Paderborn
> >
> > Mobile
> >
> > Am 29.01.2013 um 23:43 schrieb Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Ah I get it now (Andrew's list of significant iOS commits) I suppose we
> > > could internally tag an rc2 (not public release) and test the heck out
> of
> > > it. Those iOS changes are critical bug fixes since rc1.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Okay, that wasn't entirely clear...
> > >>
> > >> I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android,
> > since
> > >> most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree?
> > >>
> > >> Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should
> > generally
> > >> expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Andrew: sounds great.
> > >>>
> > >>> I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those
> > >>> commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday.
> > >>>
> > >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
> > >>>
> > >>> (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^)
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>> I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <
> gibson.becky@gmail.com
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working
> off
> > >> the
> > >>>>> same version
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fboulegue@me.com
> >
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in
> a
> > >>> small
> > >>>>>> group...?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> _____________________
> > >>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> > >>>>>> tea inc.
> > >>>>>> CEO - Founder
> > >>>>>> Meierbrede 9
> > >>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Mobile
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various
> > >>> committers in
> > >>>>>>> transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0
> on
> > >>>>>> Monday?
> > >>>>>>>> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> -Steve
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
> > >>>>>>>> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Changes of note:
> > >>>>>>>>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
> > >>>>>>>>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
> > >>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
> > >>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant
> > >> an
> > >>>>> rc2.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with
> the
> > >>> iOS
> > >>>>>>>>> repo
> > >>>>>>>>>> recently (at least more than I have).
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested
> > >>> here,
> > >>>>>>>>> about
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the known issues.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> So we would stay on time.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> _____________________
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> > >>>>>>>>>>> tea inc.
> > >>>>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
> > >>>>>>>>> releasing
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.0.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think
> this
> > >>>>> would
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> warrant
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> an rc2.
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com
> >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless
> > >>> contributors
> > >>>>>>>>> and
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left
> over
> > >>>>>>>>> from, or
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
> > >>
> >
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>.
Yes i do
I downloaded the new 2.4 release builded it via terminal and copyed my www folder any else to do?
Still somewhen no more activities appeal even not in console if i click around and use a "cordova" action and put in a console.log('') it feels like all cordova actions are blocked.
Fabian
Am Jan 30, 2013 um 5:58 PM schrieb Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>:
> Are you referring to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2285?
>
> To be clear, you've deleted your CordovaLib directory within your app's
> directory, and copied in the updated one? Then just navigate around a few
> times and the IAB doesn't show up?
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:40 AM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Andrew
>>
>> also my issues isnt fixed, also dont see the changes on the inAppBrowser
>> here....
>>
>>
>> Fabian
>>
>> Am Jan 30, 2013 um 4:23 PM schrieb Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>:
>>
>>> Okay, tagged JS, iOS, Android.
>>>
>>>
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2-src.zip
>>>
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-js.zip
>>>
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-ios.zip
>>>
>> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-android.zip
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:35 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Agree
>>>>
>>>> _____________________
>>>> Fabian Boulegue
>>>> tea inc.
>>>> CEO - Founder
>>>> Meierbrede 9
>>>> 33100 Paderborn
>>>>
>>>> Mobile
>>>>
>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 23:43 schrieb Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Ah I get it now (Andrew's list of significant iOS commits) I suppose we
>>>>> could internally tag an rc2 (not public release) and test the heck out
>> of
>>>>> it. Those iOS changes are critical bug fixes since rc1.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Okay, that wasn't entirely clear...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android,
>>>> since
>>>>>> most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should
>>>> generally
>>>>>> expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrew: sounds great.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those
>>>>>>> commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org
>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <
>> gibson.becky@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working
>> off
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> same version
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fboulegue@me.com
>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in
>> a
>>>>>>> small
>>>>>>>>>> group...?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _____________________
>>>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
>>>>>>>>>> tea inc.
>>>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
>>>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
>>>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various
>>>>>>> committers in
>>>>>>>>>>> transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0
>> on
>>>>>>>>>> Monday?
>>>>>>>>>>>> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Steve
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
>>>>>>>>>>>> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes of note:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant
>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>> rc2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with
>> the
>>>>>>> iOS
>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recently (at least more than I have).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested
>>>>>>> here,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the known issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So we would stay on time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _____________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tea inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
>>>>>>>>>>>>> releasing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think
>> this
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warrant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an rc2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com
>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless
>>>>>>> contributors
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left
>> over
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>.
Are you referring to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2285?
To be clear, you've deleted your CordovaLib directory within your app's
directory, and copied in the updated one? Then just navigate around a few
times and the IAB doesn't show up?
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:40 AM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com> wrote:
> Hey Andrew
>
> also my issues isnt fixed, also dont see the changes on the inAppBrowser
> here....
>
>
> Fabian
>
> Am Jan 30, 2013 um 4:23 PM schrieb Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>:
>
> > Okay, tagged JS, iOS, Android.
> >
> >
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2-src.zip
> >
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-js.zip
> >
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-ios.zip
> >
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-android.zip
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:35 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Agree
> >>
> >> _____________________
> >> Fabian Boulegue
> >> tea inc.
> >> CEO - Founder
> >> Meierbrede 9
> >> 33100 Paderborn
> >>
> >> Mobile
> >>
> >> Am 29.01.2013 um 23:43 schrieb Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> Ah I get it now (Andrew's list of significant iOS commits) I suppose we
> >>> could internally tag an rc2 (not public release) and test the heck out
> of
> >>> it. Those iOS changes are critical bug fixes since rc1.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Okay, that wasn't entirely clear...
> >>>>
> >>>> I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android,
> >> since
> >>>> most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree?
> >>>>
> >>>> Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should
> >> generally
> >>>> expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Andrew: sounds great.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those
> >>>>> commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <agrieve@chromium.org
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <
> gibson.becky@gmail.com
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working
> off
> >>>> the
> >>>>>>> same version
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fboulegue@me.com
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in
> a
> >>>>> small
> >>>>>>>> group...?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> _____________________
> >>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> >>>>>>>> tea inc.
> >>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
> >>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
> >>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Mobile
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various
> >>>>> committers in
> >>>>>>>>> transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0
> on
> >>>>>>>> Monday?
> >>>>>>>>>> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -Steve
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
> >>>>>>>>>> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Changes of note:
> >>>>>>>>>>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
> >>>>>>>>>>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
> >>>>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
> >>>>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant
> >>>> an
> >>>>>>> rc2.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with
> the
> >>>>> iOS
> >>>>>>>>>>> repo
> >>>>>>>>>>>> recently (at least more than I have).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested
> >>>>> here,
> >>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the known issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So we would stay on time.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _____________________
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> tea inc.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
> >>>>>>>>>>> releasing
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think
> this
> >>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warrant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an rc2.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fil@adobe.com
> >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless
> >>>>> contributors
> >>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left
> over
> >>>>>>>>>>> from, or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
> >>>>
> >>
>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>.
Hey Andrew
also my issues isnt fixed, also dont see the changes on the inAppBrowser here....
Fabian
Am Jan 30, 2013 um 4:23 PM schrieb Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>:
> Okay, tagged JS, iOS, Android.
>
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2-src.zip
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-js.zip
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-ios.zip
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-android.zip
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:35 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>
>> Agree
>>
>> _____________________
>> Fabian Boulegue
>> tea inc.
>> CEO - Founder
>> Meierbrede 9
>> 33100 Paderborn
>>
>> Mobile
>>
>> Am 29.01.2013 um 23:43 schrieb Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Ah I get it now (Andrew's list of significant iOS commits) I suppose we
>>> could internally tag an rc2 (not public release) and test the heck out of
>>> it. Those iOS changes are critical bug fixes since rc1.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Okay, that wasn't entirely clear...
>>>>
>>>> I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android,
>> since
>>>> most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree?
>>>>
>>>> Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should
>> generally
>>>> expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Andrew: sounds great.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those
>>>>> commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
>>>>>
>>>>> (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off
>>>> the
>>>>>>> same version
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a
>>>>> small
>>>>>>>> group...?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _____________________
>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
>>>>>>>> tea inc.
>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various
>>>>> committers in
>>>>>>>>> transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on
>>>>>>>> Monday?
>>>>>>>>>> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> -Steve
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
>>>>>>>>>> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Changes of note:
>>>>>>>>>>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
>>>>>>>>>>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
>>>>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
>>>>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant
>>>> an
>>>>>>> rc2.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the
>>>>> iOS
>>>>>>>>>>> repo
>>>>>>>>>>>> recently (at least more than I have).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested
>>>>> here,
>>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the known issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So we would stay on time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _____________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tea inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
>>>>>>>>>>> releasing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warrant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an rc2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless
>>>>> contributors
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
>>>>>>>>>>> from, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>>>>
>>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>.
Okay, tagged JS, iOS, Android.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2-src.zip
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-js.zip
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-ios.zip
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6648754/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-2.4.0rc2/cordova-android.zip
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:35 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com> wrote:
> Agree
>
> _____________________
> Fabian Boulegue
> tea inc.
> CEO - Founder
> Meierbrede 9
> 33100 Paderborn
>
> Mobile
>
> Am 29.01.2013 um 23:43 schrieb Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Ah I get it now (Andrew's list of significant iOS commits) I suppose we
> > could internally tag an rc2 (not public release) and test the heck out of
> > it. Those iOS changes are critical bug fixes since rc1.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Okay, that wasn't entirely clear...
> >>
> >> I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android,
> since
> >> most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree?
> >>
> >> Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should
> generally
> >> expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Andrew: sounds great.
> >>>
> >>> I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those
> >>> commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday.
> >>>
> >>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
> >>>
> >>> (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^)
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off
> >> the
> >>>>> same version
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a
> >>> small
> >>>>>> group...?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _____________________
> >>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> >>>>>> tea inc.
> >>>>>> CEO - Founder
> >>>>>> Meierbrede 9
> >>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mobile
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various
> >>> committers in
> >>>>>>> transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on
> >>>>>> Monday?
> >>>>>>>> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -Steve
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
> >>>>>>>> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Changes of note:
> >>>>>>>>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
> >>>>>>>>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
> >>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
> >>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant
> >> an
> >>>>> rc2.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the
> >>> iOS
> >>>>>>>>> repo
> >>>>>>>>>> recently (at least more than I have).
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested
> >>> here,
> >>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>> the known issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>> So we would stay on time.
> >>>>>>>>>>> _____________________
> >>>>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> >>>>>>>>>>> tea inc.
> >>>>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
> >>>>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
> >>>>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
> >>>>>>>>> releasing
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this
> >>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> warrant
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> an rc2.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless
> >>> contributors
> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
> >>>>>>>>> from, or
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
> >>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>.
Ok i found some informations about the problem after researching
ok found the problem
–
if data == href target and open inAppBrowser it ll call a error
Warning: Attempt to dismiss from view controller <MainViewController: 0x1d8776d0> while a presentation or dismiss is in progress!
So if you are on index_aerosoft.html and use a link like
<a class="noeffect" href="index_aerosoft.html" onClick="openAerosoftDE();">Aerosoft</a>
(function calls inAppBrowser with Link)
you ll get the error and no more activities are available.
Solution is to link on '#'
<a href="#" class="noeffect" onClick="openAerosoftDE();">Web</a>
This seems to work fineAm Jan 30, 2013 um 4:35 AM schrieb fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>:
Can anybody confirm that?
Maybe it should be changed or wrote down in the documentation.
Fabian
> Agree
>
> _____________________
> Fabian Boulegue
> tea inc.
> CEO - Founder
> Meierbrede 9
> 33100 Paderborn
>
> Mobile
>
> Am 29.01.2013 um 23:43 schrieb Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Ah I get it now (Andrew's list of significant iOS commits) I suppose we
>> could internally tag an rc2 (not public release) and test the heck out of
>> it. Those iOS changes are critical bug fixes since rc1.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Okay, that wasn't entirely clear...
>>>
>>> I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android, since
>>> most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree?
>>>
>>> Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should generally
>>> expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Andrew: sounds great.
>>>>
>>>> I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those
>>>> commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
>>>>
>>>> (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off
>>> the
>>>>>> same version
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a
>>>> small
>>>>>>> group...?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _____________________
>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
>>>>>>> tea inc.
>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various
>>>> committers in
>>>>>>>> transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on
>>>>>>> Monday?
>>>>>>>>> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Steve
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
>>>>>>>>> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Changes of note:
>>>>>>>>>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
>>>>>>>>>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
>>>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
>>>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant
>>> an
>>>>>> rc2.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the
>>>> iOS
>>>>>>>>>> repo
>>>>>>>>>>> recently (at least more than I have).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested
>>>> here,
>>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>>> the known issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So we would stay on time.
>>>>>>>>>>>> _____________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
>>>>>>>>>>>> tea inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
>>>>>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
>>>>>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
>>>>>>>>>> releasing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this
>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> warrant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an rc2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless
>>>> contributors
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
>>>>>>>>>> from, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>>>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>.
Agree
_____________________
Fabian Boulegue
tea inc.
CEO - Founder
Meierbrede 9
33100 Paderborn
Mobile
Am 29.01.2013 um 23:43 schrieb Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>:
> Ah I get it now (Andrew's list of significant iOS commits) I suppose we
> could internally tag an rc2 (not public release) and test the heck out of
> it. Those iOS changes are critical bug fixes since rc1.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Okay, that wasn't entirely clear...
>>
>> I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android, since
>> most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree?
>>
>> Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should generally
>> expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew: sounds great.
>>>
>>> I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those
>>> commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday.
>>>
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
>>>
>>> (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off
>> the
>>>>> same version
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a
>>> small
>>>>>> group...?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _____________________
>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
>>>>>> tea inc.
>>>>>> CEO - Founder
>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various
>>> committers in
>>>>>>> transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on
>>>>>> Monday?
>>>>>>>> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Steve
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
>>>>>>>> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Changes of note:
>>>>>>>>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
>>>>>>>>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
>>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
>>>>>>>>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant
>> an
>>>>> rc2.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the
>>> iOS
>>>>>>>>> repo
>>>>>>>>>> recently (at least more than I have).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested
>>> here,
>>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>>>>> the known issues.
>>>>>>>>>>> So we would stay on time.
>>>>>>>>>>> _____________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
>>>>>>>>>>> tea inc.
>>>>>>>>>>> CEO - Founder
>>>>>>>>>>> Meierbrede 9
>>>>>>>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
>>>>>>>>> releasing
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this
>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> warrant
>>>>>>>>>>>>> an rc2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless
>>> contributors
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
>>>>>>>>> from, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>.
Ah I get it now (Andrew's list of significant iOS commits) I suppose we
could internally tag an rc2 (not public release) and test the heck out of
it. Those iOS changes are critical bug fixes since rc1.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Okay, that wasn't entirely clear...
>
> I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android, since
> most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree?
>
> Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should generally
> expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>
> > Andrew: sounds great.
> >
> > I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those
> > commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday.
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
> >
> > (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^)
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> > wrote:
> > > I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off
> the
> > >> same version
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a
> > small
> > >> > group...?
> > >> >
> > >> > _____________________
> > >> > Fabian Boulegue
> > >> > tea inc.
> > >> > CEO - Founder
> > >> > Meierbrede 9
> > >> > 33100 Paderborn
> > >> >
> > >> > Mobile
> > >> >
> > >> > Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> > >> >
> > >> > > The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various
> > committers in
> > >> > > transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > >> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on
> > >> > Monday?
> > >> > >> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> -Steve
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
> > >> > >> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
> > >> > >>
> > >> > >>> Changes of note:
> > >> > >>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
> > >> > >>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
> > >> > >>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
> > >> > >>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant
> an
> > >> rc2.
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> > >> > >>>
> > >> > >>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the
> > iOS
> > >> > >>> repo
> > >> > >>>> recently (at least more than I have).
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
> wrote:
> > >> > >>>>
> > >> > >>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested
> > here,
> > >> > >>> about
> > >> > >>>>> the known issues.
> > >> > >>>>> So we would stay on time.
> > >> > >>>>> _____________________
> > >> > >>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> > >> > >>>>> tea inc.
> > >> > >>>>> CEO - Founder
> > >> > >>>>> Meierbrede 9
> > >> > >>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> Mobile
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> > >> > >>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
> > >> > >>> releasing
> > >> > >>>>>> 2.4.0.
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this
> > >> would
> > >> > >>>>>>> warrant
> > >> > >>>>>>> an rc2.
> > >> > >>>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >>>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless
> > contributors
> > >> > >>> and
> > >> > >>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
> > >> > >>> from, or
> > >> > >>>>>>>> new
> > >> > >>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
> > >> > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> > >>>>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
> > >> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
> > >> > >>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
> > >> > >>>>>>>>> :
> > >> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> +1
> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >> > >>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>.
Okay, that wasn't entirely clear...
I think we'd get pretty far by just tagging & testing iOS & Android, since
most of the changes since rc1 relate to those two platforms. Agree?
Given that we don't test before cutting an rc1, I think we should generally
expect that we'll need to do an rc2 before shipping a release.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> Andrew: sounds great.
>
> I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those
> commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
>
> (Hopefully with a better outcome.---^)
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> > I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <gibson.becky@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off the
> >> same version
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a
> small
> >> > group...?
> >> >
> >> > _____________________
> >> > Fabian Boulegue
> >> > tea inc.
> >> > CEO - Founder
> >> > Meierbrede 9
> >> > 33100 Paderborn
> >> >
> >> > Mobile
> >> >
> >> > Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> >> >
> >> > > The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various
> committers in
> >> > > transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
> >> > >
> >> > > On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on
> >> > Monday?
> >> > >> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> -Steve
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
> >> > >> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> Changes of note:
> >> > >>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
> >> > >>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
> >> > >>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
> >> > >>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant an
> >> rc2.
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the
> iOS
> >> > >>> repo
> >> > >>>> recently (at least more than I have).
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested
> here,
> >> > >>> about
> >> > >>>>> the known issues.
> >> > >>>>> So we would stay on time.
> >> > >>>>> _____________________
> >> > >>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> >> > >>>>> tea inc.
> >> > >>>>> CEO - Founder
> >> > >>>>> Meierbrede 9
> >> > >>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> Mobile
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
> >> > >>> releasing
> >> > >>>>>> 2.4.0.
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this
> >> would
> >> > >>>>>>> warrant
> >> > >>>>>>> an rc2.
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless
> contributors
> >> > >>> and
> >> > >>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
> >> > >>> from, or
> >> > >>>>>>>> new
> >> > >>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
> >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
> wrote:
> >> > >>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
> >> > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
> >> > >>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
> >> > >>>>>>>>> :
> >> > >>>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>>>> +1
> >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >> > >>>>>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io>.
Andrew: sounds great.
I'll talk to Shaz about doing a thoruough review of those
commits/changes. Lets stay on course for 2.4 Monday.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnP5iDKwuwk
(Hopefully with a better outcome.---^)
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
> I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <gi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off the
>> same version
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a small
>> > group...?
>> >
>> > _____________________
>> > Fabian Boulegue
>> > tea inc.
>> > CEO - Founder
>> > Meierbrede 9
>> > 33100 Paderborn
>> >
>> > Mobile
>> >
>> > Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>> >
>> > > The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various committers in
>> > > transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
>> > >
>> > > On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on
>> > Monday?
>> > >> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
>> > >>
>> > >> -Steve
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
>> > >> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Changes of note:
>> > >>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
>> > >>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
>> > >>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
>> > >>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant an
>> rc2.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the iOS
>> > >>> repo
>> > >>>> recently (at least more than I have).
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested here,
>> > >>> about
>> > >>>>> the known issues.
>> > >>>>> So we would stay on time.
>> > >>>>> _____________________
>> > >>>>> Fabian Boulegue
>> > >>>>> tea inc.
>> > >>>>> CEO - Founder
>> > >>>>> Meierbrede 9
>> > >>>>> 33100 Paderborn
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Mobile
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
>> > >>> releasing
>> > >>>>>> 2.4.0.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this
>> would
>> > >>>>>>> warrant
>> > >>>>>>> an rc2.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors
>> > >>> and
>> > >>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
>> > >>> from, or
>> > >>>>>>>> new
>> > >>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>> > >>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
>> > >>>>>>>>> :
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> +1
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>> > >
>> >
>>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Jesse is away until Thursday or Friday so the windows platforms won't get
tagged until then (unless someone has an environment setup to be able to
test for all those platforms). So the release wouldn't get out until
Monday anyways..
I stay we stick to it and release 2.4.0 on Monday. If something is broken,
we can always do a 2.4.1, or if it can wait, 2.5.0rc1.
On 1/29/13 12:41 PM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
>I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
>
>
>On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson
><gi...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off the
>> same version
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>> > Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a
>>small
>> > group...?
>> >
>> > _____________________
>> > Fabian Boulegue
>> > tea inc.
>> > CEO - Founder
>> > Meierbrede 9
>> > 33100 Paderborn
>> >
>> > Mobile
>> >
>> > Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>> >
>> > > The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various
>>committers in
>> > > transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
>> > >
>> > > On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on
>> > Monday?
>> > >> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
>> > >>
>> > >> -Steve
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
>> > >> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Changes of note:
>> > >>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
>> > >>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
>> > >>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
>> > >>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant an
>> rc2.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the
>>iOS
>> > >>> repo
>> > >>>> recently (at least more than I have).
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested
>>here,
>> > >>> about
>> > >>>>> the known issues.
>> > >>>>> So we would stay on time.
>> > >>>>> _____________________
>> > >>>>> Fabian Boulegue
>> > >>>>> tea inc.
>> > >>>>> CEO - Founder
>> > >>>>> Meierbrede 9
>> > >>>>> 33100 Paderborn
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Mobile
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
>> > >>> releasing
>> > >>>>>> 2.4.0.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this
>> would
>> > >>>>>>> warrant
>> > >>>>>>> an rc2.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless
>>contributors
>> > >>> and
>> > >>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
>> > >>> from, or
>> > >>>>>>>> new
>> > >>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com>
>>wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>> > >>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
>> > >>>>>>>>> :
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> +1
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>> > >
>> >
>>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>.
I can tag JS & iOS & Android @ rc2 today.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Becky Gibson <gi...@gmail.com>wrote:
> would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off the
> same version
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>
> > Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a small
> > group...?
> >
> > _____________________
> > Fabian Boulegue
> > tea inc.
> > CEO - Founder
> > Meierbrede 9
> > 33100 Paderborn
> >
> > Mobile
> >
> > Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> >
> > > The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various committers in
> > > transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
> > >
> > > On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on
> > Monday?
> > >> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
> > >>
> > >> -Steve
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
> > >> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Changes of note:
> > >>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
> > >>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
> > >>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
> > >>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
> > >>>
> > >>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant an
> rc2.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the iOS
> > >>> repo
> > >>>> recently (at least more than I have).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested here,
> > >>> about
> > >>>>> the known issues.
> > >>>>> So we would stay on time.
> > >>>>> _____________________
> > >>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> > >>>>> tea inc.
> > >>>>> CEO - Founder
> > >>>>> Meierbrede 9
> > >>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Mobile
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
> > >>> releasing
> > >>>>>> 2.4.0.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this
> would
> > >>>>>>> warrant
> > >>>>>>> an rc2.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors
> > >>> and
> > >>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
> > >>> from, or
> > >>>>>>>> new
> > >>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
> > >>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
> > >>>>>>>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
> > >
> >
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Becky Gibson <gi...@gmail.com>.
would be nice if we could tag a cordova-js so we are all working off the
same version
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:29 PM, fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com> wrote:
> Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a small
> group...?
>
> _____________________
> Fabian Boulegue
> tea inc.
> CEO - Founder
> Meierbrede 9
> 33100 Paderborn
>
> Mobile
>
> Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>
> > The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various committers in
> > transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
> >
> > On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on
> Monday?
> >> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
> >>
> >> -Steve
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
> >> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
> >>
> >>> Changes of note:
> >>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
> >>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
> >>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
> >>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
> >>>
> >>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant an rc2.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the iOS
> >>> repo
> >>>> recently (at least more than I have).
> >>>>
> >>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested here,
> >>> about
> >>>>> the known issues.
> >>>>> So we would stay on time.
> >>>>> _____________________
> >>>>> Fabian Boulegue
> >>>>> tea inc.
> >>>>> CEO - Founder
> >>>>> Meierbrede 9
> >>>>> 33100 Paderborn
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mobile
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
> >>> releasing
> >>>>>> 2.4.0.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this would
> >>>>>>> warrant
> >>>>>>> an rc2.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors
> >>> and
> >>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
> >>> from, or
> >>>>>>>> new
> >>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
> >>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
> >>>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
> >
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>.
Even if its no change on official repo maybe we should test it in a small group...?
_____________________
Fabian Boulegue
tea inc.
CEO - Founder
Meierbrede 9
33100 Paderborn
Mobile
Am 29.01.2013 um 20:27 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various committers in
> transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
>
> On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on Monday?
>> People interested in testing could just work off the source.
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
>> <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
>>
>>> Changes of note:
>>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
>>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
>>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
>>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
>>>
>>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant an rc2.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the iOS
>>> repo
>>>> recently (at least more than I have).
>>>>
>>>> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested here,
>>> about
>>>>> the known issues.
>>>>> So we would stay on time.
>>>>> _____________________
>>>>> Fabian Boulegue
>>>>> tea inc.
>>>>> CEO - Founder
>>>>> Meierbrede 9
>>>>> 33100 Paderborn
>>>>>
>>>>> Mobile
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
>>> releasing
>>>>>> 2.4.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this would
>>>>>>> warrant
>>>>>>> an rc2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors
>>> and
>>>>>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
>>> from, or
>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>>>>>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
The reason we aimed for Monday is because we have various committers in
transit atm and tagging is difficult today + tomorrow.
On 1/29/13 11:20 AM, "Steven Gill" <st...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on Monday?
>People interested in testing could just work off the source.
>
>-Steve
>
>On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve
><ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
>
>> Changes of note:
>> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
>> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
>> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
>> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
>>
>> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant an rc2.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the iOS
>>repo
>> > recently (at least more than I have).
>> >
>> > On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested here,
>>about
>> > >the known issues.
>> > >So we would stay on time.
>> > >_____________________
>> > >Fabian Boulegue
>> > >tea inc.
>> > >CEO - Founder
>> > >Meierbrede 9
>> > >33100 Paderborn
>> > >
>> > >Mobile
>> > >
>> > >Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>> > >
>> > >> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before
>>releasing
>> > >>2.4.0.
>> > >>
>> > >> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this would
>> > >>>warrant
>> > >>> an rc2.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors
>>and
>> > >>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over
>>from, or
>> > >>>>new
>> > >>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> So any update on release for r2?
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>> > >>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
>> > >>>>> :
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> +1
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>> > >>
>> >
>> >
>>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>.
Could we just tag iOS rc2 today and still aim to release 2.4.0 on Monday?
People interested in testing could just work off the source.
-Steve
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>wrote:
> Changes of note:
> [CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
> [CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
> Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
> Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
>
> On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant an rc2.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the iOS repo
> > recently (at least more than I have).
> >
> > On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested here, about
> > >the known issues.
> > >So we would stay on time.
> > >_____________________
> > >Fabian Boulegue
> > >tea inc.
> > >CEO - Founder
> > >Meierbrede 9
> > >33100 Paderborn
> > >
> > >Mobile
> > >
> > >Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> > >
> > >> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before releasing
> > >>2.4.0.
> > >>
> > >> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this would
> > >>>warrant
> > >>> an rc2.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors and
> > >>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over from, or
> > >>>>new
> > >>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> So any update on release for r2?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
> > >>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
> > >>>>> :
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>.
Changes of note:
[CB-2235] Fixed file transfer whitelisting for iOS6.
[CB-2290] iOS: 'CDVJSON.h' file not found when adding a plugin
Fixed InAppBrowser becoming subject to the opener's whitelist
Fixed InAppBrowser not working on iOS5
On Android, I don't see any changes since the tag that warrant an rc2.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the iOS repo
> recently (at least more than I have).
>
> On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>
> >Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested here, about
> >the known issues.
> >So we would stay on time.
> >_____________________
> >Fabian Boulegue
> >tea inc.
> >CEO - Founder
> >Meierbrede 9
> >33100 Paderborn
> >
> >Mobile
> >
> >Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> >
> >> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before releasing
> >>2.4.0.
> >>
> >> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this would
> >>>warrant
> >>> an rc2.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors and
> >>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over from, or
> >>>>new
> >>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
> >>>>
> >>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> So any update on release for r2?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
> >>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
> >>>>> :
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
> >>
>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
I'll defer to Andrew's opinion as he has been hands-on with the iOS repo
recently (at least more than I have).
On 1/29/13 10:52 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested here, about
>the known issues.
>So we would stay on time.
>_____________________
>Fabian Boulegue
>tea inc.
>CEO - Founder
>Meierbrede 9
>33100 Paderborn
>
>Mobile
>
>Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>
>> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before releasing
>>2.4.0.
>>
>> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this would
>>>warrant
>>> an rc2.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors and
>>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over from, or
>>>>new
>>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>>>>
>>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So any update on release for r2?
>>>>>
>>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>.
Well If we could commit a r2 soon I could let it been tested here, about the known issues.
So we would stay on time.
_____________________
Fabian Boulegue
tea inc.
CEO - Founder
Meierbrede 9
33100 Paderborn
Mobile
Am 29.01.2013 um 19:45 schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before releasing 2.4.0.
>
> On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this would warrant
>> an rc2.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors and
>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over from, or new
>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>>>
>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So any update on release for r2?
>>>>
>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>>> <g.natili@gnstudio.com
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
I'm uncertain and worried that we'd slip to mid-Feb before releasing 2.4.0.
On 1/29/13 10:38 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <ag...@chromium.org> wrote:
>There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this would warrant
>an rc2.
>
>
>On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors and
>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over from, or new
>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>>
>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>>
>> >So any update on release for r2?
>> >
>> >Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>><g.natili@gnstudio.com
>> >:
>> >
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> remember: silence is assent!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Andrew Grieve <ag...@chromium.org>.
There have been several fixes to iOS since rc1. I think this would warrant
an rc2.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com> wrote:
> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors and
> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over from, or new
> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>
> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>
> >So any update on release for r2?
> >
> >Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili <g.natili@gnstudio.com
> >:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
> >>
> >>> remember: silence is assent!
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>.
Here are some informations about this topic in the release note:
2539065 [CB-2071] InAppBrowser: allow UIWebView settings like main CordovaWebView
Nothing about that yet in the documentation...
Am Jan 29, 2013 um 7:22 PM schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> I talked to Fabian off this thread to clarify some of his issues.
>
> "As i saw in release notes... it should be some new properties for the
> inAppBrowser and also "pitch" to "zoom" and stuff like that but nothing to
> find in the documentation about that."
>
> Is there any missing documentation related to InAppBrowser?
>
> On 1/29/13 9:51 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Filip,
>>
>> thanks for the update.
>>
>> Still have my Problem https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2285 on
>> 2.4.0rc1 - havent fixed it yet.
>> Also i saw in the release notes about properties of inAppBrowser but cant
>> find any informations about that - how to set properties ... so i would
>> write a small how to if someone could provide informations about that.
>>
>> Greets
>>
>> Fabian
>>
>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:49 PM schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>>
>>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors and
>>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over from, or new
>>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>>>
>>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> So any update on release for r2?
>>>>
>>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>>>> <g....@gnstudio.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
I talked to Fabian off this thread to clarify some of his issues.
"As i saw in release notes... it should be some new properties for the
inAppBrowser and also "pitch" to "zoom" and stuff like that but nothing to
find in the documentation about that."
Is there any missing documentation related to InAppBrowser?
On 1/29/13 9:51 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>Hi Filip,
>
>thanks for the update.
>
>Still have my Problem https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2285 on
>2.4.0rc1 - havent fixed it yet.
>Also i saw in the release notes about properties of inAppBrowser but cant
>find any informations about that - how to set properties ... so i would
>write a small how to if someone could provide informations about that.
>
>Greets
>
>Fabian
>
>Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:49 PM schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>
>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors and
>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over from, or new
>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>>
>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So any update on release for r2?
>>>
>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>>><g....@gnstudio.com>:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
Documentation for InAppBrowser is committed.
See
http://docs.phonegap.com/en/edge/cordova_inappbrowser_inappbrowser.md.html#
InAppBrowser (there is a drop down for version in the top right corner;
during rc releases and for "latest", use "edge")
As for CB-2285, it looks like Andrew has resolved the issue.
So 2.4.0 is still on track for Monday :)
On 1/29/13 9:51 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>Hi Filip,
>
>thanks for the update.
>
>Still have my Problem https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2285 on
>2.4.0rc1 - havent fixed it yet.
>Also i saw in the release notes about properties of inAppBrowser but cant
>find any informations about that - how to set properties ... so i would
>write a small how to if someone could provide informations about that.
>
>Greets
>
>Fabian
>
>Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:49 PM schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
>
>> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors and
>> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over from, or new
>> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>>
>> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So any update on release for r2?
>>>
>>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili
>>><g....@gnstudio.com>:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>.
Hi Filip,
thanks for the update.
Still have my Problem https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2285 on 2.4.0rc1 - havent fixed it yet.
Also i saw in the release notes about properties of inAppBrowser but cant find any informations about that - how to set properties ... so i would write a small how to if someone could provide informations about that.
Greets
Fabian
Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:49 PM schrieb Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>:
> We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors and
> committers think there are some unresolved issues left over from, or new
> ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
>
> On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>
>> So any update on release for r2?
>>
>> Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili <g....@gnstudio.com>:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>>
>>>> remember: silence is assent!
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
We will go straight from 2.4.0rc1 to 2.4.0, unless contributors and
committers think there are some unresolved issues left over from, or new
ones introduced in, 2.4.0rc1 .
On 1/29/13 9:39 AM, "fabian boulegue" <fb...@me.com> wrote:
>So any update on release for r2?
>
>Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili <g....@gnstudio.com>:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>>
>>> remember: silence is assent!
>>
>>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by fabian boulegue <fb...@me.com>.
So any update on release for r2?
Am Jan 29, 2013 um 6:24 PM schrieb Giorgio Natili <g....@gnstudio.com>:
> +1
>
> On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>
>> remember: silence is assent!
>
>
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Giorgio Natili <g....@gnstudio.com>.
+1
On 1/28/13 8:11 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>remember: silence is assent!
Re: ship 2.4 monday
Posted by Filip Maj <fi...@adobe.com>.
+1 silence
On 1/28/13 11:11 AM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote:
>remember: silence is assent!