You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de> on 2008/10/28 18:46:25 UTC

Re: [Bug 3417] New Rule: Checking sender IP against MX records From: user@domain

On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:17 +0000, Justin Mason wrote:
> fwiw, this works; we can pretty easily (albeit noisily) move the 48 bugs
> in LATER or REMIND status to RESOLVED/WONTFIX.

Of course that works. ;)  Using the "Change Several Bugs at Once"
feature, you can do so in bulk without changing every single bug
manually. Unfortunately, you can't change the Resolution without
REOPENing first.

Status Whiteboard doesn't seem to support adding text, so that probably
would overwrite existing notes. Not much of a problem though, since only
bug 736 out of these has some Status Whiteboard value.

A still open question is, if all of these really should be closed, and
if so using the same Resolution. LATER and REMIND haven't been used as a
synonym for WONTFIX, have they?


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}


Re: [Bug 3417] New Rule: Checking sender IP against MX records From: user@domain

Posted by Justin Mason <jm...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann
<gu...@rudersport.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:17 +0000, Justin Mason wrote:
>> fwiw, this works; we can pretty easily (albeit noisily) move the 48 bugs
>> in LATER or REMIND status to RESOLVED/WONTFIX.
>
> Of course that works. ;)  Using the "Change Several Bugs at Once"
> feature, you can do so in bulk without changing every single bug
> manually. Unfortunately, you can't change the Resolution without
> REOPENing first.
>
> Status Whiteboard doesn't seem to support adding text, so that probably
> would overwrite existing notes. Not much of a problem though, since only
> bug 736 out of these has some Status Whiteboard value.
>
> A still open question is, if all of these really should be closed, and
> if so using the same Resolution. LATER and REMIND haven't been used as a
> synonym for WONTFIX, have they?

effectively, that's the closest resolution IMO.

--j.