You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org> on 2024/04/09 07:34:04 UTC
[DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
Hi all,
I just opened a PR to add TomEE 10.0.0-M1 Dockerfiles [1], we're now at
80 different variants of docker images being built for tomee:
$ find . -name Dockerfile | wc -l
80
In the future this number could increase even more when we add docker
images based on Java 21. (Depending on if we continue support for Java
11 [2])
IMO we should drop Dockerfiles for TomEE 8.x, it's EOL and there really
is no need to continue building docker images for it. WDYT?
Thanks
Markus
[1] https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/89
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4qox0vtoyv535w8cfkfqbx8swz95000q
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
+1 to drop TomEE 8 Docker images (non-binding)
Alex
Le mar. 9 avr. 2024 à 09:36, Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org> a écrit :
>
> +1
>
> Note: TomEE docker images are not officially distributed by the project
> itself (ASF), so no real decision space from our side, imho.
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 09.04.2024 um 09:34 +0200 schrieb Markus Jung:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I just opened a PR to add TomEE 10.0.0-M1 Dockerfiles [1], we're now
> > at
> > 80 different variants of docker images being built for tomee:
> >
> > $ find . -name Dockerfile | wc -l
> > 80
> >
> > In the future this number could increase even more when we add docker
> > images based on Java 21. (Depending on if we continue support for
> > Java
> > 11 [2])
> >
> >
> > IMO we should drop Dockerfiles for TomEE 8.x, it's EOL and there
> > really
> > is no need to continue building docker images for it. WDYT?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Markus
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/89
> >
> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4qox0vtoyv535w8cfkfqbx8swz95000q
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
Posted by Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org>.
+1
Note: TomEE docker images are not officially distributed by the project
itself (ASF), so no real decision space from our side, imho.
Am Dienstag, dem 09.04.2024 um 09:34 +0200 schrieb Markus Jung:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I just opened a PR to add TomEE 10.0.0-M1 Dockerfiles [1], we're now
> at
> 80 different variants of docker images being built for tomee:
>
> $ find . -name Dockerfile | wc -l
> 80
>
> In the future this number could increase even more when we add docker
> images based on Java 21. (Depending on if we continue support for
> Java
> 11 [2])
>
>
> IMO we should drop Dockerfiles for TomEE 8.x, it's EOL and there
> really
> is no need to continue building docker images for it. WDYT?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Markus
>
> [1] https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/89
>
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4qox0vtoyv535w8cfkfqbx8swz95000q
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
Posted by Cesar Hernandez <ce...@gmail.com>.
+1 to drop TomEE 8 Docker images.
El mié, 10 abr 2024 a las 15:25, Rod Jenkins (<ro...@rodandmichelle.com>)
escribió:
> Given that the voting is going on as we speak, I think that is a good idea.
>
> I will get the current PR merged, then when 9.1.3 is released, I will get
> that updated and moved to latest.
>
>
> Rod.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 12:53 AM
> To: dev@tomee.apache.org <de...@tomee.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
>
> (my two cents)
> wouln't it be better to wait a little bit for 9.1.3 to be released, so
> as to avoid releasing a Docker image with high CVEs ?
>
> Alex
>
> Le mar. 9 avr. 2024 à 23:50, Rod Jenkins <ro...@rodandmichelle.com> a
> écrit :
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I was looking at the "latest" tag for the official images. The latest
> tag is pointed to 8.0.16-jre17-Temurim-ubuntu-webprofile.
> >
> > If we are going to drop TomEE 8, then I would suggest using
> 9.1.2-jre17-Temurin-ubuntu-webprofile.
> >
> > Also given Temurin is the default, can we get consensus to drop Semeru?
> This would make a serious dent in our image count.
> >
> > Comment please....
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rod.
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Rod Jenkins <ro...@rodandmichelle.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:06 AM
> > To: dev@tomee.apache.org <de...@tomee.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
> >
> > Marcus,
> >
> > Thank you for the PR. I’ll get that reviewed later today. I agree
> that we need to reduce the number of images. This is something that was
> brought up before.
> >
> > We should drop 8.x given its EOL.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rod.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Apr 9, 2024, at 2:35 AM, Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
> > > I just opened a PR to add TomEE 10.0.0-M1 Dockerfiles [1], we're now
> at 80 different variants of docker images being built for tomee:
> > >
> > > $ find . -name Dockerfile | wc -l
> > > 80
> > >
> > > In the future this number could increase even more when we add docker
> images based on Java 21. (Depending on if we continue support for Java 11
> [2])
> > >
> > >
> > > IMO we should drop Dockerfiles for TomEE 8.x, it's EOL and there
> really is no need to continue building docker images for it. WDYT?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > Markus
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/89
> > >
> > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4qox0vtoyv535w8cfkfqbx8swz95000q
> > >
>
--
Atentamente:
César Hernández.
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
Posted by Rod Jenkins <ro...@rodandmichelle.com>.
Given that the voting is going on as we speak, I think that is a good idea.
I will get the current PR merged, then when 9.1.3 is released, I will get that updated and moved to latest.
Rod.
________________________________
From: Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 12:53 AM
To: dev@tomee.apache.org <de...@tomee.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
(my two cents)
wouln't it be better to wait a little bit for 9.1.3 to be released, so
as to avoid releasing a Docker image with high CVEs ?
Alex
Le mar. 9 avr. 2024 à 23:50, Rod Jenkins <ro...@rodandmichelle.com> a écrit :
>
> All,
>
> I was looking at the "latest" tag for the official images. The latest tag is pointed to 8.0.16-jre17-Temurim-ubuntu-webprofile.
>
> If we are going to drop TomEE 8, then I would suggest using 9.1.2-jre17-Temurin-ubuntu-webprofile.
>
> Also given Temurin is the default, can we get consensus to drop Semeru? This would make a serious dent in our image count.
>
> Comment please....
>
> Thanks,
> Rod.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Rod Jenkins <ro...@rodandmichelle.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:06 AM
> To: dev@tomee.apache.org <de...@tomee.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
>
> Marcus,
>
> Thank you for the PR. I’ll get that reviewed later today. I agree that we need to reduce the number of images. This is something that was brought up before.
>
> We should drop 8.x given its EOL.
>
> Thanks,
> Rod.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 9, 2024, at 2:35 AM, Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I just opened a PR to add TomEE 10.0.0-M1 Dockerfiles [1], we're now at 80 different variants of docker images being built for tomee:
> >
> > $ find . -name Dockerfile | wc -l
> > 80
> >
> > In the future this number could increase even more when we add docker images based on Java 21. (Depending on if we continue support for Java 11 [2])
> >
> >
> > IMO we should drop Dockerfiles for TomEE 8.x, it's EOL and there really is no need to continue building docker images for it. WDYT?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Markus
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/89
> >
> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4qox0vtoyv535w8cfkfqbx8swz95000q
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
Posted by Alex The Rocker <al...@gmail.com>.
(my two cents)
wouln't it be better to wait a little bit for 9.1.3 to be released, so
as to avoid releasing a Docker image with high CVEs ?
Alex
Le mar. 9 avr. 2024 à 23:50, Rod Jenkins <ro...@rodandmichelle.com> a écrit :
>
> All,
>
> I was looking at the "latest" tag for the official images. The latest tag is pointed to 8.0.16-jre17-Temurim-ubuntu-webprofile.
>
> If we are going to drop TomEE 8, then I would suggest using 9.1.2-jre17-Temurin-ubuntu-webprofile.
>
> Also given Temurin is the default, can we get consensus to drop Semeru? This would make a serious dent in our image count.
>
> Comment please....
>
> Thanks,
> Rod.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Rod Jenkins <ro...@rodandmichelle.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:06 AM
> To: dev@tomee.apache.org <de...@tomee.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
>
> Marcus,
>
> Thank you for the PR. I’ll get that reviewed later today. I agree that we need to reduce the number of images. This is something that was brought up before.
>
> We should drop 8.x given its EOL.
>
> Thanks,
> Rod.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 9, 2024, at 2:35 AM, Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> >
> > I just opened a PR to add TomEE 10.0.0-M1 Dockerfiles [1], we're now at 80 different variants of docker images being built for tomee:
> >
> > $ find . -name Dockerfile | wc -l
> > 80
> >
> > In the future this number could increase even more when we add docker images based on Java 21. (Depending on if we continue support for Java 11 [2])
> >
> >
> > IMO we should drop Dockerfiles for TomEE 8.x, it's EOL and there really is no need to continue building docker images for it. WDYT?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Markus
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/89
> >
> > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4qox0vtoyv535w8cfkfqbx8swz95000q
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
Posted by Rod Jenkins <ro...@rodandmichelle.com>.
All,
I was looking at the "latest" tag for the official images. The latest tag is pointed to 8.0.16-jre17-Temurim-ubuntu-webprofile.
If we are going to drop TomEE 8, then I would suggest using 9.1.2-jre17-Temurin-ubuntu-webprofile.
Also given Temurin is the default, can we get consensus to drop Semeru? This would make a serious dent in our image count.
Comment please....
Thanks,
Rod.
________________________________
From: Rod Jenkins <ro...@rodandmichelle.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 5:06 AM
To: dev@tomee.apache.org <de...@tomee.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
Marcus,
Thank you for the PR. I’ll get that reviewed later today. I agree that we need to reduce the number of images. This is something that was brought up before.
We should drop 8.x given its EOL.
Thanks,
Rod.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 9, 2024, at 2:35 AM, Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I just opened a PR to add TomEE 10.0.0-M1 Dockerfiles [1], we're now at 80 different variants of docker images being built for tomee:
>
> $ find . -name Dockerfile | wc -l
> 80
>
> In the future this number could increase even more when we add docker images based on Java 21. (Depending on if we continue support for Java 11 [2])
>
>
> IMO we should drop Dockerfiles for TomEE 8.x, it's EOL and there really is no need to continue building docker images for it. WDYT?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Markus
>
> [1] https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/89
>
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4qox0vtoyv535w8cfkfqbx8swz95000q
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Drop TomEE 8.x docker images?
Posted by Rod Jenkins <ro...@rodandmichelle.com>.
Marcus,
Thank you for the PR. I’ll get that reviewed later today. I agree that we need to reduce the number of images. This is something that was brought up before.
We should drop 8.x given its EOL.
Thanks,
Rod.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 9, 2024, at 2:35 AM, Markus Jung <ju...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I just opened a PR to add TomEE 10.0.0-M1 Dockerfiles [1], we're now at 80 different variants of docker images being built for tomee:
>
> $ find . -name Dockerfile | wc -l
> 80
>
> In the future this number could increase even more when we add docker images based on Java 21. (Depending on if we continue support for Java 11 [2])
>
>
> IMO we should drop Dockerfiles for TomEE 8.x, it's EOL and there really is no need to continue building docker images for it. WDYT?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Markus
>
> [1] https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/89
>
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/4qox0vtoyv535w8cfkfqbx8swz95000q
>