Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>]

Hi all,

We had a long release-related discussion for 2.6.1 [1], and we pooled in a
big list of patches [2].

Together with Akira and Sangjin who offered help with the release, I am
starting the release process.

Things to do
  (1) Create 2.6.1 branch and prep branch-2.6 for 2.6.2. I am doing this
today.
  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of cherry-pick
commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do some ground
work today.
  (3) We do have a bunch of tickets pending in 2.6.1 and marked as "Target
Version" though [3]. Sangjin / Akira, can you please help triage, make
movement etc? In case, you think they should be moved out, let's start a
conversation on JIRA and move them out. It's not likely that we are going
to wait for a whole lot of these.
  (4) There are a bunch of unresolved patches that are selected in the
candidate list. I'll need help from the entire community in making a
resolution as quickly as possible whether they get committed or moved out.

[1] Planning Hadoop 2.6.1 release
http://markmail.org/message/kq4ubcjy4b77d45n
[2] 2.6.1 candidate list:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=labels%20%3D%202.6.1-candidate%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC
[3] Pending 2.6.1 tickets:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12331711
[4] Unresolved 2.6.1 candidate tickets:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20AND%20labels%20%3D%202.6.1-candidate%20ORDER%20BY%20status%20DESC

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>]

This is done.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>> wrote:

  (1) Create 2.6.1 branch and prep branch-2.6 for 2.6.2. I am doing this today.

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>]

This is done.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>> wrote:

  (1) Create 2.6.1 branch and prep branch-2.6 for 2.6.2. I am doing this today.

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>]

This is done.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>> wrote:

  (1) Create 2.6.1 branch and prep branch-2.6 for 2.6.2. I am doing this today.

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com>]

The HADOOP-10786 patch is compatible with JDK 6.  This was a point of
discussion during the original development of the patch.  If you'd like
full details, please see the comments there.  Like Akira, I also confirmed
that the new test works correctly when running with JDK 6.

Thanks!

--Chris Nauroth




On 8/14/15, 9:22 AM, "Akira AJISAKA" <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:

>Good point. I ran the regression test in HADOOP-10786 successfully on
>"ajisakaa/common-merge" branch with JDK6.
>I'll run all the unit tests against JDK6 locally after merging all the
>jiras.
>
>Thanks,
>Akira
>
>On 8/14/15 23:21, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>>
>>   I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an
>>incompatible change.
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since
>>>this
>>> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over
>>>email
>>> too.
>>>
>>> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8
>>>broke
>>> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
>>> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK
>>>code
>>> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
>>> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't
>>>expect
>>> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I
>>>think
>>> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>>>
>>> --Chris Nauroth
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to
>>>>make it.
>>>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>>>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>>>> 2.7.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>>>
>>>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back.
>>>>>If
>>>>> you
>>>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we
>>>>>figure
>>>>> out
>>>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if
>>>>>HDFS-7704
>>>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not
>>>>>for
>>>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>>> Put the list here:
>>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And
>>>>>started
>>>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>>>>><vinodkv@apache.org
>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will
>>>>>do
>>>>> some ground work today.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com>]

The HADOOP-10786 patch is compatible with JDK 6.  This was a point of
discussion during the original development of the patch.  If you'd like
full details, please see the comments there.  Like Akira, I also confirmed
that the new test works correctly when running with JDK 6.

Thanks!

--Chris Nauroth




On 8/14/15, 9:22 AM, "Akira AJISAKA" <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:

>Good point. I ran the regression test in HADOOP-10786 successfully on
>"ajisakaa/common-merge" branch with JDK6.
>I'll run all the unit tests against JDK6 locally after merging all the
>jiras.
>
>Thanks,
>Akira
>
>On 8/14/15 23:21, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>>
>>   I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an
>>incompatible change.
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since
>>>this
>>> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over
>>>email
>>> too.
>>>
>>> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8
>>>broke
>>> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
>>> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK
>>>code
>>> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
>>> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't
>>>expect
>>> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I
>>>think
>>> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>>>
>>> --Chris Nauroth
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to
>>>>make it.
>>>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>>>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>>>> 2.7.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>>>
>>>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back.
>>>>>If
>>>>> you
>>>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we
>>>>>figure
>>>>> out
>>>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if
>>>>>HDFS-7704
>>>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not
>>>>>for
>>>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>>> Put the list here:
>>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And
>>>>>started
>>>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>>>>><vinodkv@apache.org
>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will
>>>>>do
>>>>> some ground work today.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com>]

The HADOOP-10786 patch is compatible with JDK 6.  This was a point of
discussion during the original development of the patch.  If you'd like
full details, please see the comments there.  Like Akira, I also confirmed
that the new test works correctly when running with JDK 6.

Thanks!

--Chris Nauroth




On 8/14/15, 9:22 AM, "Akira AJISAKA" <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:

>Good point. I ran the regression test in HADOOP-10786 successfully on
>"ajisakaa/common-merge" branch with JDK6.
>I'll run all the unit tests against JDK6 locally after merging all the
>jiras.
>
>Thanks,
>Akira
>
>On 8/14/15 23:21, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>>
>>   I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an
>>incompatible change.
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since
>>>this
>>> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over
>>>email
>>> too.
>>>
>>> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8
>>>broke
>>> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
>>> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK
>>>code
>>> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
>>> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't
>>>expect
>>> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I
>>>think
>>> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>>>
>>> --Chris Nauroth
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to
>>>>make it.
>>>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>>>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>>>> 2.7.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>>>
>>>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back.
>>>>>If
>>>>> you
>>>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we
>>>>>figure
>>>>> out
>>>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if
>>>>>HDFS-7704
>>>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not
>>>>>for
>>>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>>> Put the list here:
>>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And
>>>>>started
>>>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>>>>><vinodkv@apache.org
>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will
>>>>>do
>>>>> some ground work today.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com>]

The HADOOP-10786 patch is compatible with JDK 6.  This was a point of
discussion during the original development of the patch.  If you'd like
full details, please see the comments there.  Like Akira, I also confirmed
that the new test works correctly when running with JDK 6.

Thanks!

--Chris Nauroth




On 8/14/15, 9:22 AM, "Akira AJISAKA" <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:

>Good point. I ran the regression test in HADOOP-10786 successfully on
>"ajisakaa/common-merge" branch with JDK6.
>I'll run all the unit tests against JDK6 locally after merging all the
>jiras.
>
>Thanks,
>Akira
>
>On 8/14/15 23:21, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>>
>>   I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an
>>incompatible change.
>>
>> On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since
>>>this
>>> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over
>>>email
>>> too.
>>>
>>> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8
>>>broke
>>> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
>>> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK
>>>code
>>> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
>>> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't
>>>expect
>>> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I
>>>think
>>> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>>>
>>> --Chris Nauroth
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to
>>>>make it.
>>>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>>>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>>>> 2.7.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>>>
>>>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back.
>>>>>If
>>>>> you
>>>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we
>>>>>figure
>>>>> out
>>>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if
>>>>>HDFS-7704
>>>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not
>>>>>for
>>>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>>> Put the list here:
>>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And
>>>>>started
>>>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> +Vinod
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
>>>>><vinodkv@apache.org
>>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will
>>>>>do
>>>>> some ground work today.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Akira AJISAKA <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>]

Good point. I ran the regression test in HADOOP-10786 successfully on 
"ajisakaa/common-merge" branch with JDK6.
I'll run all the unit tests against JDK6 locally after merging all the 
jiras.

Thanks,
Akira

On 8/14/15 23:21, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>
>   I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an incompatible change.
>
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
>> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
>> too.
>>
>> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
>> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
>> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
>> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
>> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
>> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
>> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>>
>> --Chris Nauroth
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>>> 2.7.0.
>>>>
>>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>>
>>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>>> you
>>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>>> out
>>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>> Put the list here:
>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>>> some ground work today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Akira AJISAKA <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>]

Good point. I ran the regression test in HADOOP-10786 successfully on 
"ajisakaa/common-merge" branch with JDK6.
I'll run all the unit tests against JDK6 locally after merging all the 
jiras.

Thanks,
Akira

On 8/14/15 23:21, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>
>   I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an incompatible change.
>
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
>> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
>> too.
>>
>> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
>> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
>> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
>> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
>> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
>> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
>> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>>
>> --Chris Nauroth
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>>> 2.7.0.
>>>>
>>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>>
>>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>>> you
>>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>>> out
>>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>> Put the list here:
>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>>> some ground work today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Akira AJISAKA <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>]

Good point. I ran the regression test in HADOOP-10786 successfully on 
"ajisakaa/common-merge" branch with JDK6.
I'll run all the unit tests against JDK6 locally after merging all the 
jiras.

Thanks,
Akira

On 8/14/15 23:21, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>
>   I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an incompatible change.
>
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
>> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
>> too.
>>
>> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
>> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
>> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
>> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
>> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
>> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
>> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>>
>> --Chris Nauroth
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>>> 2.7.0.
>>>>
>>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>>
>>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>>> you
>>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>>> out
>>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>> Put the list here:
>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>>> some ground work today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Akira AJISAKA <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>]

Good point. I ran the regression test in HADOOP-10786 successfully on 
"ajisakaa/common-merge" branch with JDK6.
I'll run all the unit tests against JDK6 locally after merging all the 
jiras.

Thanks,
Akira

On 8/14/15 23:21, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
>
>   I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an incompatible change.
>
> On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
>> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
>> too.
>>
>> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
>> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
>> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
>> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
>> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
>> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
>> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>>
>> --Chris Nauroth
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>>> 2.7.0.
>>>>
>>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>>
>>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>>> you
>>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>>> out
>>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>> Put the list here:
>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>>> some ground work today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Allen Wittenauer <aw...@altiscale.com>]

 I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an incompatible change.

On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
> too.
> 
> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
> 
> --Chris Nauroth
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>> 2.7.0.
>>> 
>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>> 
>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>> you
>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>> out
>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>> 
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>> Put the list here:
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>> 
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>> some ground work today.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinayakumar B <vi...@apache.org>]

   1. HDFS-7446 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7446> : HDFS
   inotify should have the ability to determine what txid it has read up to


This is also marked for 2.6.1, but this changes the client protocol and
protobuf messages.

Please confirm whether this is Compatible change with 2.6?

Regards,
Vinay

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Akira AJISAKA <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
wrote:

> +1 for including HADOOP-10786. I've update the wiki.
>
> Thanks,
> Akira
>
>
> On 8/13/15 06:21, Chris Nauroth wrote:
>
>> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
>> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
>> too.
>>
>> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
>> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
>> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
>> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
>> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
>> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
>> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>>
>> --Chris Nauroth
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>>> 2.7.0.
>>>>
>>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>>
>>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>>> you
>>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>>> out
>>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>> Put the list here:
>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@apache.org
>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>>> some ground work today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinayakumar B <vi...@apache.org>]

   1. HDFS-7446 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7446> : HDFS
   inotify should have the ability to determine what txid it has read up to


This is also marked for 2.6.1, but this changes the client protocol and
protobuf messages.

Please confirm whether this is Compatible change with 2.6?

Regards,
Vinay

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Akira AJISAKA <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>
wrote:

> +1 for including HADOOP-10786. I've update the wiki.
>
> Thanks,
> Akira
>
>
> On 8/13/15 06:21, Chris Nauroth wrote:
>
>> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
>> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
>> too.
>>
>> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
>> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
>> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
>> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
>> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
>> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
>> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>>
>> --Chris Nauroth
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>>> 2.7.0.
>>>>
>>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>>
>>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>>> you
>>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>>> out
>>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>>> Put the list here:
>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> +Vinod
>>>>
>>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>>> vinodkv@apache.org
>>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>>> some ground work today.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Akira AJISAKA <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>]

+1 for including HADOOP-10786. I've update the wiki.

Thanks,
Akira

On 8/13/15 06:21, Chris Nauroth wrote:
> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
> too.
>
> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>
> --Chris Nauroth
>
>
>
>
> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>> 2.7.0.
>>>
>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>
>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>> you
>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>> out
>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>> Put the list here:
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>> some ground work today.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Akira AJISAKA <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>]

+1 for including HADOOP-10786. I've update the wiki.

Thanks,
Akira

On 8/13/15 06:21, Chris Nauroth wrote:
> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
> too.
>
> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>
> --Chris Nauroth
>
>
>
>
> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>> 2.7.0.
>>>
>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>
>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>> you
>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>> out
>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>> Put the list here:
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>> some ground work today.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Allen Wittenauer <aw...@altiscale.com>]

 I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an incompatible change.

On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
> too.
> 
> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
> 
> --Chris Nauroth
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>> 2.7.0.
>>> 
>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>> 
>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>> you
>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>> out
>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>> 
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>> Put the list here:
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>> 
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>> some ground work today.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Akira AJISAKA <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>]

+1 for including HADOOP-10786. I've update the wiki.

Thanks,
Akira

On 8/13/15 06:21, Chris Nauroth wrote:
> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
> too.
>
> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>
> --Chris Nauroth
>
>
>
>
> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>> 2.7.0.
>>>
>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>
>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>> you
>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>> out
>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>> Put the list here:
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>> some ground work today.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Akira AJISAKA <aj...@oss.nttdata.co.jp>]

+1 for including HADOOP-10786. I've update the wiki.

Thanks,
Akira

On 8/13/15 06:21, Chris Nauroth wrote:
> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
> too.
>
> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
>
> --Chris Nauroth
>
>
>
>
> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>> 2.7.0.
>>>
>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>>
>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>> you
>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>> out
>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>> Put the list here:
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>>
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>    (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>> some ground work today.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Allen Wittenauer <aw...@altiscale.com>]

 I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an incompatible change.

On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
> too.
> 
> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
> 
> --Chris Nauroth
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>> 2.7.0.
>>> 
>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>> 
>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>> you
>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>> out
>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>> 
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>> Put the list here:
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>> 
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>> some ground work today.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Allen Wittenauer <aw...@altiscale.com>]

 I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an incompatible change.

On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
> is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
> too.
> 
> This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
> our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
> UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
> change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
> repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
> a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
> HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.
> 
> --Chris Nauroth
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>> It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>> HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>>> 2.7.0.
>>> 
>>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>> 
>>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>> you
>>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>> out
>>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>> 
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>>> Put the list here:
>>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> +Vinod
>>> 
>>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>>> some ground work today.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com>]

I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
too.

This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.

--Chris Nauroth




On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:

>It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>
>On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>> 2.7.0.
>>
>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>
>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>you
>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>out
>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>
>> Thanks
>> +Vinod
>>
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>> Put the list here:
>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>
>> Thanks
>> +Vinod
>>
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>> some ground work today.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com>]

I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
too.

This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.

--Chris Nauroth




On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:

>It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>
>On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>> 2.7.0.
>>
>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>
>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>you
>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>out
>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>
>> Thanks
>> +Vinod
>>
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>> Put the list here:
>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>
>> Thanks
>> +Vinod
>>
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>> some ground work today.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com>]

I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
too.

This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.

--Chris Nauroth




On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:

>It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>
>On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>> 2.7.0.
>>
>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>
>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>you
>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>out
>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>
>> Thanks
>> +Vinod
>>
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>> Put the list here:
>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>
>> Thanks
>> +Vinod
>>
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>> some ground work today.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Chris Nauroth <cn...@hortonworks.com>]

I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786.  Since this
is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
too.

This bug was originally reported with JDK 8.  A code change in JDK 8 broke
our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
UserGroupInformation to fix it.  Just today I discovered that the JDK code
change has made it into the JDK 7 code line too.  Specifically, I can
repro the bug against OpenJDK 1.7.0_85.  Since many users wouldn't expect
a minor version upgrade of the JDK to cause such a severe problem, I think
HADOOP-10786 is justified for inclusion in a patch release.

--Chris Nauroth




On 8/11/15, 7:48 PM, "Sangjin Lee" <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:

>It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
>It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
>HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
>
>On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
>> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
>> 2.7.0.
>>
>> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>>
>> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If
>>you
>> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure
>>out
>> the why and the dependent tickets.
>>
>> Thanks
>> +Vinod
>>
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
>> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
>> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
>> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
>> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
>> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
>> Put the list here:
>> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
>> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>>
>> Thanks
>> +Vinod
>>
>> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
>> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>
>>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
>> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
>> some ground work today.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>]

It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
> 2.7.0.
>
> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>
> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If you
> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure out
> the why and the dependent tickets.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
> Put the list here:
> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
> some ground work today.
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>]

It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
> 2.7.0.
>
> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>
> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If you
> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure out
> the why and the dependent tickets.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
> Put the list here:
> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
> some ground work today.
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>]

It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
> 2.7.0.
>
> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>
> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If you
> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure out
> the why and the dependent tickets.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
> Put the list here:
> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
> some ground work today.
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>]

It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in
> 2.7.0.
>
> Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
>
> I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If you
> want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure out
> the why and the dependent tickets.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com<mailto:
> sjlee0@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
> makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
> HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
> HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
> vinodkv@hortonworks.com<ma...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
> Put the list here:
> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vinodkv@apache.org
> <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>
>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
> some ground work today.
>
>
>
>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>]

I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in 2.7.0.

Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.

I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If you want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure out the why and the dependent tickets.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704 makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
Put the list here: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>> wrote:

  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do some ground work today.

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>]

I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in 2.7.0.

Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.

I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If you want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure out the why and the dependent tickets.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704 makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
Put the list here: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>> wrote:

  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do some ground work today.

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>]

I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in 2.7.0.

Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.

I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If you want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure out the why and the dependent tickets.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704 makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
Put the list here: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>> wrote:

  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do some ground work today.

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>]

I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in 2.7.0.

Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.

I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If you want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure out the why and the dependent tickets.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704 makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>> wrote:
Put the list here: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>> wrote:

  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do some ground work today.

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>]

Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Put the list here:
> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
> some ground work today.
>
>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>]

Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Put the list here:
> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
> some ground work today.
>
>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>]

Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Put the list here:
> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
> some ground work today.
>
>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>]

Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704
makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for
HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport
HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704.

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <
vinodkv@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Put the list here:
> https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started
> figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
>
> Thanks
> +Vinod
>
> On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>   (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of
> cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do
> some ground work today.
>
>
>

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>]

Put the list here: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>> wrote:

  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do some ground work today.

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>]

Put the list here: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>> wrote:

  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do some ground work today.

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>]

This is done.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>> wrote:

  (1) Create 2.6.1 branch and prep branch-2.6 for 2.6.2. I am doing this today.

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>]

Put the list here: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>> wrote:

  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do some ground work today.

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

[Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@hortonworks.com>]

Put the list here: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.

Thanks
+Vinod

On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli <vi...@apache.org>> wrote:

  (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an ordered list of cherry-pick commits that we can do from our candidate list [1], will do some ground work today.