You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by hw...@apache.org on 2010/09/15 16:01:29 UTC

svn commit: r997340 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h

Author: hwright
Date: Wed Sep 15 14:01:29 2010
New Revision: 997340

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=997340&view=rev
Log:
* subversion/include/svn_client.h:
  Move some comments to the appropriate location (to prevent them from causing
  problems elsewhere).

Modified:
    subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h

Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h?rev=997340&r1=997339&r2=997340&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h (original)
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h Wed Sep 15 14:01:29 2010
@@ -53,18 +53,6 @@ extern "C" {
 #endif /* __cplusplus */
 
 
-/**
-   ### @todo  Multiple Targets
-    - Up for debate:  an update on multiple targets is *not* atomic.
-    Right now, svn_client_update only takes one path.  What's
-    debatable is whether this should ever change.  On the one hand,
-    it's kind of losing to have the client application loop over
-    targets and call svn_client_update() on each one;  each call to
-    update initializes a whole new repository session (network
-    overhead, etc.)  On the other hand, it's a very simple
-    implementation, and allows for the possibility that different
-    targets may come from different repositories.  */
-
 
 /**
  * Get libsvn_client version information.
@@ -1201,6 +1189,17 @@ svn_client_checkout(svn_revnum_t *result
  *
  * Use @a pool for any temporary allocation.
  *
+ *  @todo  Multiple Targets
+ *  - Up for debate:  an update on multiple targets is *not* atomic.
+ *  Right now, svn_client_update only takes one path.  What's
+ *  debatable is whether this should ever change.  On the one hand,
+ *  it's kind of losing to have the client application loop over
+ *  targets and call svn_client_update() on each one;  each call to
+ *  update initializes a whole new repository session (network
+ *  overhead, etc.)  On the other hand, it's a very simple
+ *  implementation, and allows for the possibility that different
+ *  targets may come from different repositories.
+ *
  * @since New in 1.5.
  */
 svn_error_t *