You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@batchee.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> on 2013/10/29 13:29:40 UTC
source repo and initial import
Hi!
Is there already a repo for batchee already set up?
Didn't find anything so far.
I talked with Romain on IRC and the steps we agreed on are the following:
We
will first import the JBatch part from Scott Kurtz taken as is with a
clear commit message that this is the original import and the 'forked'
part.
After that we will change the license headers, do the proper
NOTICE and LICENSE file changes and start applying our changes on top of
it.
That way it should be really clear in the repo which part was the RI foundation and what parts got added by us.
any objection?
LieGrue,
strub
Re: source repo and initial import
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Yep, just 3 modules. The issue is more my fork doesnt start from it
Le 29 oct. 2013 13:45, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> I'd not import the whole RI but only the parts we really use. And we add a
> commit message which makes it very clear that those parts are taken from
> the RI.
> Otherwise we would have the whole history of JBatch in our own repos. And
> also all the parts we do not even use. Nor sure if we like this. Rather
> say no.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 13:36
> > Subject: Re: source repo and initial import
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > No repo yet, jira is still pending.
> >
> > The still unclear part for me is the part between RI and my current
> github
> > fork.
> >
> > Importing the RI then overriding it would be easier but would lost
> tracking
> >
> > Le 29 oct. 2013 13:32, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO"
> > <je...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> >> Sounds good Mark. Thanks for sharing.
> >>
> >> JLouis
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/10/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> > Is there already a repo for batchee already set up?
> >> > Didn't find anything so far.
> >> >
> >> > I talked with Romain on IRC and the steps we agreed on are the
> > following:
> >> > We
> >> > will first import the JBatch part from Scott Kurtz taken as is with
> a
> >> > clear commit message that this is the original import and the
> > 'forked'
> >> > part.
> >> > After that we will change the license headers, do the proper
> >> > NOTICE and LICENSE file changes and start applying our changes on top
> > of
> >> > it.
> >> >
> >> > That way it should be really clear in the repo which part was the RI
> >> > foundation and what parts got added by us.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > any objection?
> >> >
> >> > LieGrue,
> >> > strub
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Louis
> >>
> >
>
Re: source repo and initial import
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
good idea, txs!
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 14:20
> Subject: Re: source repo and initial import
>
> hi @ all,
>
> @mark:
> that sounds reasonable. furthermore, it might be useful to add the link to
> the official approval as well.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
>
>
>
> 2013/10/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>
>> I'd not import the whole RI but only the parts we really use. And we
> add a
>> commit message which makes it very clear that those parts are taken from
>> the RI.
>> Otherwise we would have the whole history of JBatch in our own repos. And
>> also all the parts we do not even use. Nor sure if we like this. Rather
>> say no.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
>> > To: dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org
>> > Cc:
>> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 13:36
>> > Subject: Re: source repo and initial import
>> >
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > No repo yet, jira is still pending.
>> >
>> > The still unclear part for me is the part between RI and my current
>> github
>> > fork.
>> >
>> > Importing the RI then overriding it would be easier but would lost
>> tracking
>> >
>> > Le 29 oct. 2013 13:32, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO"
>> > <je...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> >
>> >> Sounds good Mark. Thanks for sharing.
>> >>
>> >> JLouis
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2013/10/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> >>
>> >> > Hi!
>> >> >
>> >> > Is there already a repo for batchee already set up?
>> >> > Didn't find anything so far.
>> >> >
>> >> > I talked with Romain on IRC and the steps we agreed on are
> the
>> > following:
>> >> > We
>> >> > will first import the JBatch part from Scott Kurtz taken as
> is with
>> a
>> >> > clear commit message that this is the original import and
> the
>> > 'forked'
>> >> > part.
>> >> > After that we will change the license headers, do the proper
>> >> > NOTICE and LICENSE file changes and start applying our
> changes on top
>> > of
>> >> > it.
>> >> >
>> >> > That way it should be really clear in the repo which part
> was the RI
>> >> > foundation and what parts got added by us.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > any objection?
>> >> >
>> >> > LieGrue,
>> >> > strub
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Jean-Louis
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: source repo and initial import
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
hi @ all,
@mark:
that sounds reasonable. furthermore, it might be useful to add the link to
the official approval as well.
regards,
gerhard
2013/10/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> I'd not import the whole RI but only the parts we really use. And we add a
> commit message which makes it very clear that those parts are taken from
> the RI.
> Otherwise we would have the whole history of JBatch in our own repos. And
> also all the parts we do not even use. Nor sure if we like this. Rather
> say no.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 13:36
> > Subject: Re: source repo and initial import
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > No repo yet, jira is still pending.
> >
> > The still unclear part for me is the part between RI and my current
> github
> > fork.
> >
> > Importing the RI then overriding it would be easier but would lost
> tracking
> >
> > Le 29 oct. 2013 13:32, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO"
> > <je...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >
> >> Sounds good Mark. Thanks for sharing.
> >>
> >> JLouis
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/10/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> > Is there already a repo for batchee already set up?
> >> > Didn't find anything so far.
> >> >
> >> > I talked with Romain on IRC and the steps we agreed on are the
> > following:
> >> > We
> >> > will first import the JBatch part from Scott Kurtz taken as is with
> a
> >> > clear commit message that this is the original import and the
> > 'forked'
> >> > part.
> >> > After that we will change the license headers, do the proper
> >> > NOTICE and LICENSE file changes and start applying our changes on top
> > of
> >> > it.
> >> >
> >> > That way it should be really clear in the repo which part was the RI
> >> > foundation and what parts got added by us.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > any objection?
> >> >
> >> > LieGrue,
> >> > strub
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Louis
> >>
> >
>
Re: source repo and initial import
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
I'd not import the whole RI but only the parts we really use. And we add a commit message which makes it very clear that those parts are taken from the RI.
Otherwise we would have the whole history of JBatch in our own repos. And also all the parts we do not even use. Nor sure if we like this. Rather say no.
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@batchee.incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013, 13:36
> Subject: Re: source repo and initial import
>
> Hi
>
> No repo yet, jira is still pending.
>
> The still unclear part for me is the part between RI and my current github
> fork.
>
> Importing the RI then overriding it would be easier but would lost tracking
>
> Le 29 oct. 2013 13:32, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO"
> <je...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> Sounds good Mark. Thanks for sharing.
>>
>> JLouis
>>
>>
>> 2013/10/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > Is there already a repo for batchee already set up?
>> > Didn't find anything so far.
>> >
>> > I talked with Romain on IRC and the steps we agreed on are the
> following:
>> > We
>> > will first import the JBatch part from Scott Kurtz taken as is with a
>> > clear commit message that this is the original import and the
> 'forked'
>> > part.
>> > After that we will change the license headers, do the proper
>> > NOTICE and LICENSE file changes and start applying our changes on top
> of
>> > it.
>> >
>> > That way it should be really clear in the repo which part was the RI
>> > foundation and what parts got added by us.
>> >
>> >
>> > any objection?
>> >
>> > LieGrue,
>> > strub
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis
>>
>
Re: source repo and initial import
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi
No repo yet, jira is still pending.
The still unclear part for me is the part between RI and my current github
fork.
Importing the RI then overriding it would be easier but would lost tracking
Le 29 oct. 2013 13:32, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <je...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Sounds good Mark. Thanks for sharing.
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/10/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Is there already a repo for batchee already set up?
> > Didn't find anything so far.
> >
> > I talked with Romain on IRC and the steps we agreed on are the following:
> > We
> > will first import the JBatch part from Scott Kurtz taken as is with a
> > clear commit message that this is the original import and the 'forked'
> > part.
> > After that we will change the license headers, do the proper
> > NOTICE and LICENSE file changes and start applying our changes on top of
> > it.
> >
> > That way it should be really clear in the repo which part was the RI
> > foundation and what parts got added by us.
> >
> >
> > any objection?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>
Re: source repo and initial import
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good Mark. Thanks for sharing.
JLouis
2013/10/29 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> Hi!
>
> Is there already a repo for batchee already set up?
> Didn't find anything so far.
>
> I talked with Romain on IRC and the steps we agreed on are the following:
> We
> will first import the JBatch part from Scott Kurtz taken as is with a
> clear commit message that this is the original import and the 'forked'
> part.
> After that we will change the license headers, do the proper
> NOTICE and LICENSE file changes and start applying our changes on top of
> it.
>
> That way it should be really clear in the repo which part was the RI
> foundation and what parts got added by us.
>
>
> any objection?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
--
Jean-Louis