re: 1.2.9 beta

[Russell Haley <rh...@axys.com>]

Okay, let me try asking this question again:

Is l4n 1.2.9 "beta" stable enough for production applicaitons or would I be
better off using 1.1.1 from the archive list? I would prefer not to have to
use a three year old version to avoid a beta release. That's why I asked if
there is any reason 1.2.9 is still beta... Is there a specific reason like
it must be in beta for a set time period, or a bug that you're still working
on, or is your team really particular about what it calls "release"?

Cheers 
Russ

Re: 1.2.9 beta

[Chad Humphries <ch...@gmail.com>]

1.2.9 has been rock solid for us in our applications.  I recommend it
or beta 8.  Log4net has a somewhat lengthy stretch of time between
versions.

-Chad

On 6/17/05, Ron Grabowski <ro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I think its safe to say that no one uses 1.1.1 anymore. A lot of people
> on the list have been using 1.2.0 beta 8 in production for quick some
> time. I started using 1.2.9 beta builds on some production applications
> a few weeks ago.
> 
> --- Russell Haley <rh...@axys.com> wrote:
> 
> > Okay, let me try asking this question again:
> >
> > Is l4n 1.2.9 "beta" stable enough for production applicaitons or
> > would I be
> > better off using 1.1.1 from the archive list? I would prefer not to
> > have to
> > use a three year old version to avoid a beta release. That's why I
> > asked if
> > there is any reason 1.2.9 is still beta... Is there a specific reason
> > like
> > it must be in beta for a set time period, or a bug that you're still
> > working
> > on, or is your team really particular about what it calls "release"?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Russ
> >
> >
> 
>

RE: 1.2.9 beta

[Dru Sellers <ds...@chinaleads.net>]

When is the team planning on another STABLE release?


dru


-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Grabowski [mailto:rongrabowski@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 12:44 PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: re: 1.2.9 beta

I think its safe to say that no one uses 1.1.1 anymore. A lot of people on
the list have been using 1.2.0 beta 8 in production for quick some time. I
started using 1.2.9 beta builds on some production applications a few weeks
ago. 

--- Russell Haley <rh...@axys.com> wrote:

> Okay, let me try asking this question again:
> 
> Is l4n 1.2.9 "beta" stable enough for production applicaitons or would 
> I be better off using 1.1.1 from the archive list? I would prefer not 
> to have to use a three year old version to avoid a beta release. 
> That's why I asked if there is any reason 1.2.9 is still beta... Is 
> there a specific reason like it must be in beta for a set time period, 
> or a bug that you're still working on, or is your team really 
> particular about what it calls "release"?
> 
> Cheers
> Russ
> 
> 

re: 1.2.9 beta

[Ron Grabowski <ro...@yahoo.com>]

I think its safe to say that no one uses 1.1.1 anymore. A lot of people
on the list have been using 1.2.0 beta 8 in production for quick some
time. I started using 1.2.9 beta builds on some production applications
a few weeks ago. 

--- Russell Haley <rh...@axys.com> wrote:

> Okay, let me try asking this question again:
> 
> Is l4n 1.2.9 "beta" stable enough for production applicaitons or
> would I be
> better off using 1.1.1 from the archive list? I would prefer not to
> have to
> use a three year old version to avoid a beta release. That's why I
> asked if
> there is any reason 1.2.9 is still beta... Is there a specific reason
> like
> it must be in beta for a set time period, or a bug that you're still
> working
> on, or is your team really particular about what it calls "release"?
> 
> Cheers 
> Russ
> 
>