WMLSerialize

["Sobeck, David" <da...@thinklinkinc.com>]

I note that Xerces 1.0.4 added a dom implementation for WML, but shouldn't
there be a corresponding WMLSerializer?

Re: WMLSerialize

[Arkin <ar...@exoffice.com>]

Sorry, must include "against a variety of WAP devices".

arkin

Arnaud Le Hors wrote:
> 
> Arkin wrote:
> >
> > so whoever writes
> > it must be able to actually test it.
> 
> I surely expect that from anyone committing code!
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - IBM Cupertino, XML Technology Group

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assaf Arkin                                           www.exoffice.com
CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc.                        www.exolab.org

Re: WMLSerialize

[Arnaud Le Hors <le...@us.ibm.com>]

Arkin wrote:
> 
> so whoever writes
> it must be able to actually test it.

I surely expect that from anyone committing code!
-- 
Arnaud  Le Hors - IBM Cupertino, XML Technology Group

Re: WMLSerialize

[Arkin <ar...@exoffice.com>]

WMLSerializer is not much different than an XMLSerializer with the
exception of the document declaration. Some WAP devices are very
sensitive to what goes into the document declaration, so whoever writes
it must be able to actually test it.

arkin

Mike Pogue wrote:
> 
> Good idea...Please write one!  What is your schedule for doing so?  :-) :-)
> 
> Mike
> 
> > "Sobeck, David" wrote:
> >
> > I note that Xerces 1.0.4 added a dom implementation for WML, but shouldn't there be a
> > corresponding WMLSerializer?

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assaf Arkin                                           www.exoffice.com
CTO, Exoffice Technologies, Inc.                        www.exolab.org

Re: WMLSerialize

[Mike Pogue <mp...@apache.org>]

Good idea...Please write one!  What is your schedule for doing so?  :-) :-)

Mike

> "Sobeck, David" wrote:
> 
> I note that Xerces 1.0.4 added a dom implementation for WML, but shouldn't there be a
> corresponding WMLSerializer?