Re: 3.0.1 or 3.1?

[Rick McGuire <ri...@gmail.com>]

Another +1` for making the release 3.1.

David Blevins wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2008, at 4:35 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>> We might want to start thinking release pretty soon here.
>
> Another topic is weather or not we want to call this 3.0.1 or 3.1.
>
> I was just talking to one of the guys from InfoQ about the upcoming 
> release and he definitely liked some of the new features but sort of 
> went cold on the idea of a news post wanting to wait till 3.1.  Got me 
> thinking that maybe 3.0.1 isn't such a wise idea if we really want to 
> get the word out there.
>
> If you look at our changes, they're mostly new features and 
> improvements with just a few bug fixes.  My thoughts previous to 
> talking with him was that we should reserve 3.1 for a more EJB 3.1 
> packed release.  But really we already have a few great EJB 3.1 
> features like the embedded testing stuff and ejbs in wars.
>
> Maybe the right answer is just to go for the gusto and call it OpenEJB 
> 3.1 and get people starting to think of us as EJB 3.1.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -David
>
>