[net] name clash? (Was: more common classes need a home)

[Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>]

On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Tomasz Pik wrote:

> Jeffrey Dever wrote:
> > There are still a bunch of classes that are in both HttpClient and
> > Slide.  In particular:
> > Base64.java
> > HttpsURL.java
> > HttpURL.java
> > URIException.java
> > URI.java
> > URIUtil.java
> > URLUtil.java
>
> Base64 into 'codec' but the rest?

> commons-net is reserved... in the time of moving from 'sandbox'.
> Maybe it's a good moment for change from commons-net to
> commons-protocols? Or maybe those classes should go into
> commons-lang (another subpackage, lang.net, another long
> discussion about the scope of lang :-)?

Definitely outside commons-lang scope I think. I'd have said 'commons-net'
too, but there is already a project there. Any ideas from the [net]
people? :)

Hen


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org