You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2011/01/27 07:16:13 UTC
Maven3 ?
Hi,
what are folks thinking about using Maven3. I did some tests for
Trinidad and Maven 3 yesterday ([1]).
Things like the regular build and site generation is working fine. I
am not (yet) 100% how our (Apache) Hudson
build machine like Maven3 (I used 3.0.2).
However we can simply test that.
I wonder if folks would mind, if the Trinidad build (as a starter...)
would be "requiring" Maven3.x, in the near future?
Greetings,
Matthias
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2006
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: Maven3 ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Ok, the hosted Maven3.0.2 works fine with the current version of our
pom (which now (kinda) requires m3).
Most important: the nightly builds works, as they worked before.
So, that part would be fixed - for now I am keeping this
"improvement", at least temporary.
(I will keep 2006 open for a bit, even it looks like we solved it)
-M
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> As expected, the build failed locally and on hudson (see
> TRINIDAD-2006) due to the site plugin.
>
> However it is possible to use our Hudson machine with Maven 3.0.2 -
> currently I am doing that,
> with the patch from TRINIDAD-2006.
>
> -M
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> what are folks thinking about using Maven3. I did some tests for
>> Trinidad and Maven 3 yesterday ([1]).
>> Things like the regular build and site generation is working fine. I
>> am not (yet) 100% how our (Apache) Hudson
>> build machine like Maven3 (I used 3.0.2).
>>
>> However we can simply test that.
>>
>> I wonder if folks would mind, if the Trinidad build (as a starter...)
>> would be "requiring" Maven3.x, in the near future?
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Matthias
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2006
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: Maven3 ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
As expected, the build failed locally and on hudson (see
TRINIDAD-2006) due to the site plugin.
However it is possible to use our Hudson machine with Maven 3.0.2 -
currently I am doing that,
with the patch from TRINIDAD-2006.
-M
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what are folks thinking about using Maven3. I did some tests for
> Trinidad and Maven 3 yesterday ([1]).
> Things like the regular build and site generation is working fine. I
> am not (yet) 100% how our (Apache) Hudson
> build machine like Maven3 (I used 3.0.2).
>
> However we can simply test that.
>
> I wonder if folks would mind, if the Trinidad build (as a starter...)
> would be "requiring" Maven3.x, in the near future?
>
> Greetings,
> Matthias
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2006
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: Maven3 ?
Posted by Thomas Modeneis <th...@soujava.org.br>.
Hello Matt,
Oh I don't mind...in fact I think this update will be good for Trinidad
builds.
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:16 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what are folks thinking about using Maven3. I did some tests for
> Trinidad and Maven 3 yesterday ([1]).
> Things like the regular build and site generation is working fine. I
> am not (yet) 100% how our (Apache) Hudson
> build machine like Maven3 (I used 3.0.2).
>
> However we can simply test that.
>
> I wonder if folks would mind, if the Trinidad build (as a starter...)
> would be "requiring" Maven3.x, in the near future?
>
> Greetings,
> Matthias
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2006
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
Re: Maven3 ?
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
With a similar issue in one of my projects, related to the slightly
different version range resolution with maven 2 and 3 I just came across
this:
https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-and-site-plugin.html#Maven3.xandsiteplugin-Usingmavensiteplugin2.xwithMaven2.xandmavensiteplugin3.xwithMaven3.x
<https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-and-site-plugin.html#Maven3.xandsiteplugin-Usingmavensiteplugin2.xwithMaven2.xandmavensiteplugin3.xwithMaven3.x>You
can use that hack to do one thing if you have maven 3 or another if you have
maven 2...
Cheers,
Bruno
On 27 January 2011 15:15, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> mvn site works locally (I changed the site plugin version).
> Trinidad Tagdoc, JavaDoc, RAT, Findbugs => all work (at least locally
> on my Ubuntu box)
>
> -M
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > How is the entire reporting secion doing, the last time I did a deep
> check
> > maven3 did not have the reporting anymore and the new external modules
> were
> > under development.
> >
> > Werner
> >
> >
> > Am 27.01.11 07:16, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> what are folks thinking about using Maven3. I did some tests for
> >> Trinidad and Maven 3 yesterday ([1]).
> >> Things like the regular build and site generation is working fine. I
> >> am not (yet) 100% how our (Apache) Hudson
> >> build machine like Maven3 (I used 3.0.2).
> >>
> >> However we can simply test that.
> >>
> >> I wonder if folks would mind, if the Trinidad build (as a starter...)
> >> would be "requiring" Maven3.x, in the near future?
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2006
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
Re: Maven3 ?
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
mvn site works locally (I changed the site plugin version).
Trinidad Tagdoc, JavaDoc, RAT, Findbugs => all work (at least locally
on my Ubuntu box)
-M
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> How is the entire reporting secion doing, the last time I did a deep check
> maven3 did not have the reporting anymore and the new external modules were
> under development.
>
> Werner
>
>
> Am 27.01.11 07:16, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> what are folks thinking about using Maven3. I did some tests for
>> Trinidad and Maven 3 yesterday ([1]).
>> Things like the regular build and site generation is working fine. I
>> am not (yet) 100% how our (Apache) Hudson
>> build machine like Maven3 (I used 3.0.2).
>>
>> However we can simply test that.
>>
>> I wonder if folks would mind, if the Trinidad build (as a starter...)
>> would be "requiring" Maven3.x, in the near future?
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Matthias
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2006
>>
>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: Maven3 ?
Posted by Werner Punz <we...@gmail.com>.
How is the entire reporting secion doing, the last time I did a deep
check maven3 did not have the reporting anymore and the new external
modules were under development.
Werner
Am 27.01.11 07:16, schrieb Matthias Wessendorf:
> Hi,
>
> what are folks thinking about using Maven3. I did some tests for
> Trinidad and Maven 3 yesterday ([1]).
> Things like the regular build and site generation is working fine. I
> am not (yet) 100% how our (Apache) Hudson
> build machine like Maven3 (I used 3.0.2).
>
> However we can simply test that.
>
> I wonder if folks would mind, if the Trinidad build (as a starter...)
> would be "requiring" Maven3.x, in the near future?
>
> Greetings,
> Matthias
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TRINIDAD-2006
>