Re: Hudson build is back to normal: River-trunk #160

[Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Jonathan Costers
<jo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I notice Hudson is still using the make files to build the River QA harness
> and tests (when I look at the console output). Maybe we should reconfigure
> it to use Ant for building and running the harness and tests?

Yes, that would be good.

Do you have suggestions for the appropriate ant targets to invoke in
the CI build? Ideally we could have one reasonably fast CI build that
we can run as often as possible (i.e. whenever a commit is made), and
another more intensive CI build that's run daily or weekly depending
on how long it takes.

BR,

Jukka Zitting

Re: Hudson build is back to normal: River-trunk #160

[Jonathan Costers <jo...@googlemail.com>]

If we parametrize the test categories to run (already done that in my local
copy of the trunk) we could invoke ant like this:

ant -Dqatests.categories=id,jeri test.qa

and be able to specify different categories for the two builds

Most of the categories take pretty long to run, but some do not, like "id"
for instance. I have run them all by now so I could compile a list of
categories to run for each build.


2009/4/1 Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Jonathan Costers
> <jo...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > I notice Hudson is still using the make files to build the River QA
> harness
> > and tests (when I look at the console output). Maybe we should
> reconfigure
> > it to use Ant for building and running the harness and tests?
>
> Yes, that would be good.
>
> Do you have suggestions for the appropriate ant targets to invoke in
> the CI build? Ideally we could have one reasonably fast CI build that
> we can run as often as possible (i.e. whenever a commit is made), and
> another more intensive CI build that's run daily or weekly depending
> on how long it takes.
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>