You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudberry.apache.org by Dianjin Wang <wa...@gmail.com> on 2025/03/07 03:33:41 UTC
Re: When to release Cloudberry 2.0
As the first phase of the cherry-pick work nears completion, I believe
it’s time to start preparing for the Cloudberry 2.0 release as Reshke
asked earlier this week.
I would like to provide some inputs for consideration from my perspective:
* High Priority: Cleanup PRs (#731, #812, #920) should be included in
the 2.0 release for a better codebase and ASF compliance
* Low Priority: Other ideas that need more feedback (#948, #961, #909)
Additionally, I’ve gathered some requests from community members:
* Besides providing RPM packages for EL 8/9, will offer .deb packages?
* How can upgrade from 1.6.0 to 2.0.0? Will there be documentation for this?
Thanks! Looking forward to your thoughts!
On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:56 PM Max Yang <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It's good that we are starting to work on the pg_upgrade now.
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 3:23 PM Kirill Reshke <re...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 at 00:14, Kirill Reshke <re...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I tried gp_upgrade once again today. Our gp 6 fork is here[1].
> > > Currently, there is some vital work from GP7 missing in CBDB, so I did
> > > a cherry-pick PR [2]. Most probably, gpupgrade will need some more
> > > attention after [2] merged, this is what I'm currently working on.
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/open-gpdb/gpupgrade
> > > [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/898
> > >
> >
> > Today I was hacking a new set of pg_upgrade cherry-picks [0]. While
> > doing so, I discovered that Apache Cloudberry (CDBD) has basically no
> > CI for pg_upgrade (and thus, gp_upgrade). I believe this open source
> > project should derive the best service and experience to its community
> > and users, and thus we need to begin supporting gp_upgrade scenarios
> > (or, at least, activity in that direction). This includes, at very
> > least, CDBD to CDBD binary upgrade support. In ideal case, with
> > release of CDBD there will be support for 1.6 to 2.0 binary upgrade
> > using gp_upgrade, along with comprehensive instructions on how to
> > handle specific problems. I am aware that this is overly optimistic,
> > though.
> >
> > I'll keep working in this direction, attempting to engage as many
> > engineer resources (other pg/cbdb hackers) as possible. I cannot,
> > however, promise that I will be successful here by the release of 2.0.
> >
> > [0] https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/955
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> > Kirill Reshke
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cloudberry.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cloudberry.apache.org
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cloudberry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cloudberry.apache.org
Re: When to release Cloudberry 2.0
Posted by "Joshua D. Drake" <em...@joshuadrake.me>.
We might be able to help with that.
Founder - https://commandprompt.com/ - 24x7x365 Postgres since 1997Founder and Co-Chair - https://postgresconf.org/ Founder - https://postgresql.us - United States PostgreSQLPublic speaker, published author, postgresql expert, and people believer.Host - More than a refresh: A podcast about data and the people who wrangle it.
Sent from Proton Mail Android
-------- Original Message --------
On 3/19/25 07:01, Dianjin Wang <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One more request from the community member, FYI: Any chance to provide
> one official docker image for the new release?
>
> Best,
> Dianjin Wang
>
> On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 11:33 AM Dianjin Wang <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > As the first phase of the cherry-pick work nears completion, I believe
> > it’s time to start preparing for the Cloudberry 2.0 release as Reshke
> > asked earlier this week.
> >
> > I would like to provide some inputs for consideration from my perspective:
> > * High Priority: Cleanup PRs (#731, #812, #920) should be included in
> > the 2.0 release for a better codebase and ASF compliance
> > * Low Priority: Other ideas that need more feedback (#948, #961, #909)
> >
> > Additionally, I’ve gathered some requests from community members:
> > * Besides providing RPM packages for EL 8/9, will offer .deb packages?
> > * How can upgrade from 1.6.0 to 2.0.0? Will there be documentation for this?
> >
> > Thanks! Looking forward to your thoughts!
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:56 PM Max Yang <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's good that we are starting to work on the pg_upgrade now.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 3:23 PM Kirill Reshke <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 at 00:14, Kirill Reshke <re...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I tried gp_upgrade once again today. Our gp 6 fork is here[1].
> > > > > Currently, there is some vital work from GP7 missing in CBDB, so I did
> > > > > a cherry-pick PR [2]. Most probably, gpupgrade will need some more
> > > > > attention after [2] merged, this is what I'm currently working on.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://github.com/open-gpdb/gpupgrade
> > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/898
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Today I was hacking a new set of pg_upgrade cherry-picks [0]. While
> > > > doing so, I discovered that Apache Cloudberry (CDBD) has basically no
> > > > CI for pg_upgrade (and thus, gp_upgrade). I believe this open source
> > > > project should derive the best service and experience to its community
> > > > and users, and thus we need to begin supporting gp_upgrade scenarios
> > > > (or, at least, activity in that direction). This includes, at very
> > > > least, CDBD to CDBD binary upgrade support. In ideal case, with
> > > > release of CDBD there will be support for 1.6 to 2.0 binary upgrade
> > > > using gp_upgrade, along with comprehensive instructions on how to
> > > > handle specific problems. I am aware that this is overly optimistic,
> > > > though.
> > > >
> > > > I'll keep working in this direction, attempting to engage as many
> > > > engineer resources (other pg/cbdb hackers) as possible. I cannot,
> > > > however, promise that I will be successful here by the release of 2.0.
> > > >
> > > > [0] https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/955
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Kirill Reshke
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cloudberry.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cloudberry.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cloudberry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cloudberry.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cloudberry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cloudberry.apache.org
Re: When to release Cloudberry 2.0
Posted by Dianjin Wang <wa...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
One more request from the community member, FYI: Any chance to provide
one official docker image for the new release?
Best,
Dianjin Wang
On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 11:33 AM Dianjin Wang <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> As the first phase of the cherry-pick work nears completion, I believe
> it’s time to start preparing for the Cloudberry 2.0 release as Reshke
> asked earlier this week.
>
> I would like to provide some inputs for consideration from my perspective:
> * High Priority: Cleanup PRs (#731, #812, #920) should be included in
> the 2.0 release for a better codebase and ASF compliance
> * Low Priority: Other ideas that need more feedback (#948, #961, #909)
>
> Additionally, I’ve gathered some requests from community members:
> * Besides providing RPM packages for EL 8/9, will offer .deb packages?
> * How can upgrade from 1.6.0 to 2.0.0? Will there be documentation for this?
>
> Thanks! Looking forward to your thoughts!
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:56 PM Max Yang <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > It's good that we are starting to work on the pg_upgrade now.
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 3:23 PM Kirill Reshke <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 at 00:14, Kirill Reshke <re...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I tried gp_upgrade once again today. Our gp 6 fork is here[1].
> > > > Currently, there is some vital work from GP7 missing in CBDB, so I did
> > > > a cherry-pick PR [2]. Most probably, gpupgrade will need some more
> > > > attention after [2] merged, this is what I'm currently working on.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/open-gpdb/gpupgrade
> > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/898
> > > >
> > >
> > > Today I was hacking a new set of pg_upgrade cherry-picks [0]. While
> > > doing so, I discovered that Apache Cloudberry (CDBD) has basically no
> > > CI for pg_upgrade (and thus, gp_upgrade). I believe this open source
> > > project should derive the best service and experience to its community
> > > and users, and thus we need to begin supporting gp_upgrade scenarios
> > > (or, at least, activity in that direction). This includes, at very
> > > least, CDBD to CDBD binary upgrade support. In ideal case, with
> > > release of CDBD there will be support for 1.6 to 2.0 binary upgrade
> > > using gp_upgrade, along with comprehensive instructions on how to
> > > handle specific problems. I am aware that this is overly optimistic,
> > > though.
> > >
> > > I'll keep working in this direction, attempting to engage as many
> > > engineer resources (other pg/cbdb hackers) as possible. I cannot,
> > > however, promise that I will be successful here by the release of 2.0.
> > >
> > > [0] https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/955
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Kirill Reshke
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cloudberry.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cloudberry.apache.org
> > >
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cloudberry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cloudberry.apache.org
Re: When to release Cloudberry 2.0
Posted by Max Yang <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi hackers,
We’re working on contributing the PAX feature and aim to complete it by
March. Since this feature involves catalog changes, we’d like to have it
included in the 2.0 release.
I agree that it’s a good time to start preparing for the 2.0 release.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 11:36 AM Dianjin Wang <wa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As the first phase of the cherry-pick work nears completion, I believe
> it’s time to start preparing for the Cloudberry 2.0 release as Reshke
> asked earlier this week.
>
> I would like to provide some inputs for consideration from my perspective:
> * High Priority: Cleanup PRs (#731, #812, #920) should be included in
> the 2.0 release for a better codebase and ASF compliance
> * Low Priority: Other ideas that need more feedback (#948, #961, #909)
>
> Additionally, I’ve gathered some requests from community members:
> * Besides providing RPM packages for EL 8/9, will offer .deb packages?
> * How can upgrade from 1.6.0 to 2.0.0? Will there be documentation for
> this?
>
> Thanks! Looking forward to your thoughts!
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 1:56 PM Max Yang <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > It's good that we are starting to work on the pg_upgrade now.
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 3:23 PM Kirill Reshke <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 at 00:14, Kirill Reshke <re...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I tried gp_upgrade once again today. Our gp 6 fork is here[1].
> > > > Currently, there is some vital work from GP7 missing in CBDB, so I
> did
> > > > a cherry-pick PR [2]. Most probably, gpupgrade will need some more
> > > > attention after [2] merged, this is what I'm currently working on.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/open-gpdb/gpupgrade
> > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/898
> > > >
> > >
> > > Today I was hacking a new set of pg_upgrade cherry-picks [0]. While
> > > doing so, I discovered that Apache Cloudberry (CDBD) has basically no
> > > CI for pg_upgrade (and thus, gp_upgrade). I believe this open source
> > > project should derive the best service and experience to its community
> > > and users, and thus we need to begin supporting gp_upgrade scenarios
> > > (or, at least, activity in that direction). This includes, at very
> > > least, CDBD to CDBD binary upgrade support. In ideal case, with
> > > release of CDBD there will be support for 1.6 to 2.0 binary upgrade
> > > using gp_upgrade, along with comprehensive instructions on how to
> > > handle specific problems. I am aware that this is overly optimistic,
> > > though.
> > >
> > > I'll keep working in this direction, attempting to engage as many
> > > engineer resources (other pg/cbdb hackers) as possible. I cannot,
> > > however, promise that I will be successful here by the release of 2.0.
> > >
> > > [0] https://github.com/apache/cloudberry/pull/955
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,
> > > Kirill Reshke
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cloudberry.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cloudberry.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@cloudberry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@cloudberry.apache.org
>
>