You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2011/05/08 09:24:12 UTC
[Vote] httpd 2.2.18 release
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that -win32-src.zip
is generated from unix as a test, and if found invalid, will be rerolled.
+/-1
[ ] Release httpd 2.2.18 as GA
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.18 release
Posted by Dan Poirier <po...@pobox.com>.
On Sun. 2011-05-08 at 03:24 AM EDT, "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
> (x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that -win32-src.zip
> is generated from unix as a test, and if found invalid, will be rerolled.
>
> +/-1
> [+1] Release httpd 2.2.18 as GA
+1
checksums and signatures check
no test regressions on Mac OS X 10.6.7 or Linux x86_64 Ubuntu 10.04.
Dan
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.18 release
Posted by Noel Butler <no...@ausics.net>.
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 02:24 -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
> (x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that -win32-src.zip
> is generated from unix as a test, and if found invalid, will be rerolled.
>
> +/-1
> [ ] Release httpd 2.2.18 as GA
>
>
Good to go on Slackware 13.0 and 13.1
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.18 release
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 08.05.2011 09:24, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
> (x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that -win32-src.zip
> is generated from unix as a test, and if found invalid, will be rerolled.
>
> +/-1
> [+1] Release httpd 2.2.18 as GA
+1 for release.
Tested on Solaris 8+10 Sparc, SuSE Linux Enterprise 10 (32Bit and
64Bit), RedHat Enterprise Linux 5 64Bit
- Signature and Hashes OK
- gz and bz2 identical, no unexpected diff to svn tag
- builds fine using gcc
- with large module set
- either static or shared
- MPMs prefork, worker, event (where applicable)
- apr/apu 1.4.4/1.3.11 and bundled
- test suite run for all those builds
New failures:
- Failed test 1 in t/modules/filter.t at line 14
The test is new, Jeff saw the same failure when testing
apr 1.4.3 with httpd. I can't investigate now.
Old failures:
- Failed test 2 in t/ssl/extlookup.t at line 27
- Failed test 9 in t/ssl/require.t at line 44
Not a regression. From the analysis for 2.2.16:
Both fail when trying to read the OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.12.0 with value
"Lemons" from the client cert "client_ok". mod_test_ssl returns NULL,
SSLRequire logs
[info] [client 127.0.0.1] Failed expression: "Lemons" in
OID("1.3.6.1.4.1.18060.12.0")
I wasn't able to find the root cause, the value seems to be in the cert
when I dump it with OpenSSL. The dump shows leading "..", which seems to
be because the value was configured DER encoded.
OpenSSL version was 0.9.8o.
Joe said in 2010: "These are testing for the bug fixed in r946240 (and
should pass on the trunk), though backporting that to 2.2.x is slightly
more involved."
Regards,
Rainer
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.18 release
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 3:24 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
[+1] Release httpd 2.2.18 as GA
tested on Ubuntu 10.04 (32-bit)
source diffs with 2.2.17 look good
test diffs with 2.2.17 look good (worker MPM, bundled apr/apr-util,
lots of mods, today's httpd-test for each httpd version)
2.2.17:
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/modules/dav.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 16 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 16
t/ssl/extlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
t/ssl/require.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 9
t/modules/filter.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 1 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
Files=94, Tests=3157, 127 wallclock secs ( 2.53 usr 0.26 sys + 61.98
cusr 12.05 csys = 76.82 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 4/94 test programs. 4/3157 subtests failed.
2.2.18:
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/ssl/extlookup.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 4 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 2
t/modules/filter.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 1 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 1
t/ssl/require.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 10 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 9
Files=94, Tests=3157, 127 wallclock secs ( 2.44 usr 0.23 sys + 61.54
cusr 12.15 csys = 76.36 CPU)
Result: FAIL
Failed 3/94 test programs. 3/3157 subtests failed.
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.18 release
Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On 5/9/2011 3:11 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 5/8/2011 2:24 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
>> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
>> (x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that -win32-src.zip
>> is generated from unix as a test, and if found invalid, will be rerolled.
>>
>> +/-1
>> [+1] Release httpd 2.2.18 as GA
>
> Note that on win32, we have new packages, with new sigs/hashes to match,
> only srclib/pcre/*.[mak|dep] were changed.
With that change, I'm +1... build is looking fine from VC6 to VC10.
Not quite so much luck with the DDK methodology but I'll continue to
work on this. Don't know why I repeated the same misstatement above
(candidate *tarballs*) but the typical win32 .msi packages are now
available in /dev/dist/.
Late tomorrow night I'll start staging these unless we see negative
feedback between now and then. Things are looking pretty good.
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.18 release
Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On 5/8/2011 2:24 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
> (x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that -win32-src.zip
> is generated from unix as a test, and if found invalid, will be rerolled.
>
> +/-1
> [ ] Release httpd 2.2.18 as GA
Note that on win32, we have new packages, with new sigs/hashes to match,
only srclib/pcre/*.[mak|dep] were changed.
Author: wrowe
Date: Mon May 9 19:38:21 2011
New Revision: 281
Log:
Replace win32 for missing pcre command line build files
Modified:
dev/httpd/httpd-2.2.18-win32-src.zip
dev/httpd/httpd-2.2.18-win32-src.zip.asc
dev/httpd/httpd-2.2.18-win32-src.zip.md5
dev/httpd/httpd-2.2.18-win32-src.zip.sha1
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.18 release
Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On 5/8/2011 2:24 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
> (x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that -win32-src.zip
> is generated from unix as a test, and if found invalid, will be rerolled.
>
> +/-1
> [ ] Release httpd 2.2.18 as GA
I count 5 +1's from PMC, along with other affirmative feedback on-list and
in PM's to me. Staging now for announcement within 24 hrs (please see and
feel free to edit Announce2.2.txt/html as appropriate).
Re: [Vote] httpd 2.2.18 release
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Looks good.. OSX and Fed14
+1
On May 8, 2011, at 3:24 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
> these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
> (x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that -win32-src.zip
> is generated from unix as a test, and if found invalid, will be rerolled.
>
> +/-1
> [ ] Release httpd 2.2.18 as GA
>
>
>
>