You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> on 2009/01/05 23:06:06 UTC
[VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
Distribution:
* [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
Maven 2 staging repository:
* [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
with a vote on its quality:
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
list.
As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
to help do the work
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Al Sutton <al...@funkyandroid.com>.
It might be better to set up an RSS feed and use something like
twitterfeed.com to pipe it out to twitter, that way we can cater for RSS
fans and twitter fans in one go.
Al.
Rene Gielen wrote:
> BWT, since this is getting a more and more ususal practice, how about
> opening a Struts2 twitter account to post announcements, grep fellows
> etc?
>
> Rene Gielen schrieb:
>> Guys,
>>
>> the wikidocs export seems to be missing both in the
>> struts-2.1.6-all.zip struts-2.1.6-docs.zip. The good news is that
>> this does not mean that a new release process has to be triggered
>> afaik, since these are artifacts which can be changed easily before
>> final distribution (which is not the case for maven artifacts). This
>> should really be fixed before release.
>>
>> Minor findings in showcase:
>> - token example 3 (token-session based .jsp example) fails, while 4
>> (fremarker) works fine
>> - field Validators with client-side JavaScript does no client side
>> validation, same with Validation (client) and Validation (client
>> using css_xhtml theme) (tested with Glassfish V2 / Firefox 3 / Ubuntu
>> Hardy)
>> - Person Manager / create person is broken
>>
>> Most of the these are good to fix in next relase, only the client
>> validation stuff might be a stopping reason. Maybe someone could
>> crosscheck - if it's broken in general, we should think of fixing it
>> before a release.
>>
>> I think we also need a nice and handy "press compatible" release
>> note, which gives a good overview on 2.1 enhancements over 2.0 and
>> why this makes it the #1, most advanced action framework available :)
>>
>> So far for now,
>> - Rene
>>
>> Musachy Barroso schrieb:
>>> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>>>
>>> Release notes:
>>> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>>>
>>> Distribution:
>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>>>
>>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>>>
>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>>> with a vote on its quality:
>>>
>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>
>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>>
>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>>> list.
>>>
>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>>> to help do the work
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net>.
BWT, since this is getting a more and more ususal practice, how about
opening a Struts2 twitter account to post announcements, grep fellows etc?
Rene Gielen schrieb:
> Guys,
>
> the wikidocs export seems to be missing both in the struts-2.1.6-all.zip
> struts-2.1.6-docs.zip. The good news is that this does not mean that a
> new release process has to be triggered afaik, since these are artifacts
> which can be changed easily before final distribution (which is not the
> case for maven artifacts). This should really be fixed before release.
>
> Minor findings in showcase:
> - token example 3 (token-session based .jsp example) fails, while 4
> (fremarker) works fine
> - field Validators with client-side JavaScript does no client side
> validation, same with Validation (client) and Validation (client using
> css_xhtml theme) (tested with Glassfish V2 / Firefox 3 / Ubuntu Hardy)
> - Person Manager / create person is broken
>
> Most of the these are good to fix in next relase, only the client
> validation stuff might be a stopping reason. Maybe someone could
> crosscheck - if it's broken in general, we should think of fixing it
> before a release.
>
> I think we also need a nice and handy "press compatible" release note,
> which gives a good overview on 2.1 enhancements over 2.0 and why this
> makes it the #1, most advanced action framework available :)
>
> So far for now,
> - Rene
>
> Musachy Barroso schrieb:
>> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>>
>> Release notes:
>> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>>
>> Distribution:
>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>>
>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>>
>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>> with a vote on its quality:
>>
>> [ ] Leave at test build
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>
>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>
>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>> list.
>>
>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>> to help do the work
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
--
René Gielen
IT-Neering.net
Saarstrasse 100, 52062 Aachen, Germany
Tel: +49-(0)241-4010770
Fax: +49-(0)241-4010771
Cel: +49-(0)177-3194448
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good.
musachy
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 00:28 +0100, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik wrote:
>> I haven't clicked through the entire showcase app before, so I'm not
>> sure if some of the "view sources" links doesn't show any
>> configuration or "java action" source? Also, the MailReader link on
>> the "home" page seems broken. Other than that, everything seems to
>> work fine (token examples too), except for the mentioned PersonManager
>> issues.
>>
>
> Since the personmanager is broken, would it be a problem to set one up
> ala Spring/JPA/HSQLDB or any other embedded db? I would say we could
> essentially grab the guide Musachy setup in the wiki.
>
> -Wes
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com>.
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 00:28 +0100, Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik wrote:
> I haven't clicked through the entire showcase app before, so I'm not
> sure if some of the "view sources" links doesn't show any
> configuration or "java action" source? Also, the MailReader link on
> the "home" page seems broken. Other than that, everything seems to
> work fine (token examples too), except for the mentioned PersonManager
> issues.
>
Since the personmanager is broken, would it be a problem to set one up
ala Spring/JPA/HSQLDB or any other embedded db? I would say we could
essentially grab the guide Musachy setup in the wiki.
-Wes
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik <ni...@gmail.com>.
I haven't clicked through the entire showcase app before, so I'm not
sure if some of the "view sources" links doesn't show any
configuration or "java action" source? Also, the MailReader link on
the "home" page seems broken. Other than that, everything seems to
work fine (token examples too), except for the mentioned PersonManager
issues.
+1 GA
Nils-H
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com> wrote:
> +1 GA
>
> (possibly binding?)
>
> Rene, I didn't get the same problems... Person manager is indeed broken
> for 'Create Person,' but I had no problems with the token examples. I
> tested them pretty thoroughly and was able to hit the button three or
> four times before the next page loaded. No matter how many times I got
> the button, the proper balance was transferred (no double/triple
> submissions).
>
> The field validators with client-side javascript worked for me, as did
> the others. I too was testing on Ubuntu and Firefox 3, but with tomcat
> (in maven, but doing `mvn tomcat:run`).
>
> I'm okay with Person Manager being broken.
>
> On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 14:08 +0100, Rene Gielen wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> the wikidocs export seems to be missing both in the struts-2.1.6-all.zip
>> struts-2.1.6-docs.zip. The good news is that this does not mean that a
>> new release process has to be triggered afaik, since these are artifacts
>> which can be changed easily before final distribution (which is not the
>> case for maven artifacts). This should really be fixed before release.
>>
>> Minor findings in showcase:
>> - token example 3 (token-session based .jsp example) fails, while 4
>> (fremarker) works fine
>> - field Validators with client-side JavaScript does no client side
>> validation, same with Validation (client) and Validation (client using
>> css_xhtml theme) (tested with Glassfish V2 / Firefox 3 / Ubuntu Hardy)
>> - Person Manager / create person is broken
>>
>> Most of the these are good to fix in next relase, only the client
>> validation stuff might be a stopping reason. Maybe someone could
>> crosscheck - if it's broken in general, we should think of fixing it
>> before a release.
>>
>> I think we also need a nice and handy "press compatible" release note,
>> which gives a good overview on 2.1 enhancements over 2.0 and why this
>> makes it the #1, most advanced action framework available :)
>>
>> So far for now,
>> - Rene
>>
>> Musachy Barroso schrieb:
>> > The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>> >
>> > Release notes:
>> > * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>> >
>> > Distribution:
>> > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>> >
>> > Maven 2 staging repository:
>> > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>> >
>> > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>> > with a vote on its quality:
>> >
>> > [ ] Leave at test build
>> > [ ] Alpha
>> > [ ] Beta
>> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
>> >
>> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>> >
>> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>> > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>> > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>> > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>> > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>> > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>> > list.
>> >
>> > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>> > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>> > to help do the work
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Martin Cooper <ma...@apache.org>.
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com> wrote:
> +1 GA
>
> (possibly binding?)
Yes, binding. :-) I'll try to get the docs updated later today.
--
Martin Cooper
> Rene, I didn't get the same problems... Person manager is indeed broken
> for 'Create Person,' but I had no problems with the token examples. I
> tested them pretty thoroughly and was able to hit the button three or
> four times before the next page loaded. No matter how many times I got
> the button, the proper balance was transferred (no double/triple
> submissions).
>
> The field validators with client-side javascript worked for me, as did
> the others. I too was testing on Ubuntu and Firefox 3, but with tomcat
> (in maven, but doing `mvn tomcat:run`).
>
> I'm okay with Person Manager being broken.
>
> On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 14:08 +0100, Rene Gielen wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > the wikidocs export seems to be missing both in the struts-2.1.6-all.zip
> > struts-2.1.6-docs.zip. The good news is that this does not mean that a
> > new release process has to be triggered afaik, since these are artifacts
> > which can be changed easily before final distribution (which is not the
> > case for maven artifacts). This should really be fixed before release.
> >
> > Minor findings in showcase:
> > - token example 3 (token-session based .jsp example) fails, while 4
> > (fremarker) works fine
> > - field Validators with client-side JavaScript does no client side
> > validation, same with Validation (client) and Validation (client using
> > css_xhtml theme) (tested with Glassfish V2 / Firefox 3 / Ubuntu Hardy)
> > - Person Manager / create person is broken
> >
> > Most of the these are good to fix in next relase, only the client
> > validation stuff might be a stopping reason. Maybe someone could
> > crosscheck - if it's broken in general, we should think of fixing it
> > before a release.
> >
> > I think we also need a nice and handy "press compatible" release note,
> > which gives a good overview on 2.1 enhancements over 2.0 and why this
> > makes it the #1, most advanced action framework available :)
> >
> > So far for now,
> > - Rene
> >
> > Musachy Barroso schrieb:
> > > The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
> > >
> > > Release notes:
> > > * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
> > >
> > > Distribution:
> > > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
> > >
> > > Maven 2 staging repository:
> > > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/
> ]
> > >
> > > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> > > with a vote on its quality:
> > >
> > > [ ] Leave at test build
> > > [ ] Alpha
> > > [ ] Beta
> > > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> > >
> > > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> > >
> > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> > > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> > > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> > > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> > > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> > > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> > > list.
> > >
> > > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> > > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> > > to help do the work
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net>.
+1 GA
Although it bugs me a little that I cannot verify cs validation (and
currently missing opportunity to dig deeper), it seems like it's just me
here, or my setup - so let's roll :)
Any volunteers for a slick press summary on the new features, given the
vote passes? It should be available by the time of a GA announcement,
since the last releases showed that the news was spread very fast, and
it might be good to influence what the news articles will emphasize...
- Rene
Wes Wannemacher schrieb:
> +1 GA
>
> (possibly binding?)
>
> Rene, I didn't get the same problems... Person manager is indeed broken
> for 'Create Person,' but I had no problems with the token examples. I
> tested them pretty thoroughly and was able to hit the button three or
> four times before the next page loaded. No matter how many times I got
> the button, the proper balance was transferred (no double/triple
> submissions).
>
> The field validators with client-side javascript worked for me, as did
> the others. I too was testing on Ubuntu and Firefox 3, but with tomcat
> (in maven, but doing `mvn tomcat:run`).
>
> I'm okay with Person Manager being broken.
>
> On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 14:08 +0100, Rene Gielen wrote:
>> Guys,
>>
>> the wikidocs export seems to be missing both in the struts-2.1.6-all.zip
>> struts-2.1.6-docs.zip. The good news is that this does not mean that a
>> new release process has to be triggered afaik, since these are artifacts
>> which can be changed easily before final distribution (which is not the
>> case for maven artifacts). This should really be fixed before release.
>>
>> Minor findings in showcase:
>> - token example 3 (token-session based .jsp example) fails, while 4
>> (fremarker) works fine
>> - field Validators with client-side JavaScript does no client side
>> validation, same with Validation (client) and Validation (client using
>> css_xhtml theme) (tested with Glassfish V2 / Firefox 3 / Ubuntu Hardy)
>> - Person Manager / create person is broken
>>
>> Most of the these are good to fix in next relase, only the client
>> validation stuff might be a stopping reason. Maybe someone could
>> crosscheck - if it's broken in general, we should think of fixing it
>> before a release.
>>
>> I think we also need a nice and handy "press compatible" release note,
>> which gives a good overview on 2.1 enhancements over 2.0 and why this
>> makes it the #1, most advanced action framework available :)
>>
>> So far for now,
>> - Rene
>>
>> Musachy Barroso schrieb:
>>> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>>>
>>> Release notes:
>>> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>>>
>>> Distribution:
>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>>>
>>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>>>
>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>>> with a vote on its quality:
>>>
>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>
>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>>
>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>>> list.
>>>
>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>>> to help do the work
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
--
René Gielen
IT-Neering.net
Saarstrasse 100, 52062 Aachen, Germany
Tel: +49-(0)241-4010770
Fax: +49-(0)241-4010771
Cel: +49-(0)177-3194448
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com>.
+1 GA
(possibly binding?)
Rene, I didn't get the same problems... Person manager is indeed broken
for 'Create Person,' but I had no problems with the token examples. I
tested them pretty thoroughly and was able to hit the button three or
four times before the next page loaded. No matter how many times I got
the button, the proper balance was transferred (no double/triple
submissions).
The field validators with client-side javascript worked for me, as did
the others. I too was testing on Ubuntu and Firefox 3, but with tomcat
(in maven, but doing `mvn tomcat:run`).
I'm okay with Person Manager being broken.
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 14:08 +0100, Rene Gielen wrote:
> Guys,
>
> the wikidocs export seems to be missing both in the struts-2.1.6-all.zip
> struts-2.1.6-docs.zip. The good news is that this does not mean that a
> new release process has to be triggered afaik, since these are artifacts
> which can be changed easily before final distribution (which is not the
> case for maven artifacts). This should really be fixed before release.
>
> Minor findings in showcase:
> - token example 3 (token-session based .jsp example) fails, while 4
> (fremarker) works fine
> - field Validators with client-side JavaScript does no client side
> validation, same with Validation (client) and Validation (client using
> css_xhtml theme) (tested with Glassfish V2 / Firefox 3 / Ubuntu Hardy)
> - Person Manager / create person is broken
>
> Most of the these are good to fix in next relase, only the client
> validation stuff might be a stopping reason. Maybe someone could
> crosscheck - if it's broken in general, we should think of fixing it
> before a release.
>
> I think we also need a nice and handy "press compatible" release note,
> which gives a good overview on 2.1 enhancements over 2.0 and why this
> makes it the #1, most advanced action framework available :)
>
> So far for now,
> - Rene
>
> Musachy Barroso schrieb:
> > The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
> >
> > Release notes:
> > * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
> >
> > Distribution:
> > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
> >
> > Maven 2 staging repository:
> > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
> >
> > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> > with a vote on its quality:
> >
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >
> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >
> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> > list.
> >
> > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> > to help do the work
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
It seems like the get ant task sometimes fails to download the whole
file. Rene mentioned that he had the same problem when building 2.0.x.
I uploaded a new all.zip(just the /docs part modified) and doc.zip. I
am thinking about replacing that "get" task by an "execute" task and
use wget to download the file.
musachy
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> the wikidocs export seems to be missing both in the struts-2.1.6-all.zip
>> struts-2.1.6-docs.zip. The good news is that this does not mean that a new
>> release process has to be triggered afaik, since these are artifacts which
>> can be changed easily before final distribution (which is not the case for
>> maven artifacts). This should really be fixed before release.
>>
>
> That's a nice catch!. It is kind of weird, I looked at the box where I
> built the release and docs.zip is under assembly/target, but I
> couldn't unzip it:
>
> % unzip docs.zip
> Archive: docs.zip
> End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not
> a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the
> latter case the central directory and zipfile comment will be found on
> the last disk(s) of this archive.
> unzip: cannot find zipfile directory in one of docs.zip or
> docs.zip.zip, and cannot find docs.zip.ZIP, period.
>
> The zip is fine in 2.1.3 but it is broken in 2.1.4, 2.1.5, and 2.1.6.
> Also the cwiki zip (http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs.zip) seems
> right, so I don't have any explanation for this.
>
>> Minor findings in showcase:
>> - token example 3 (token-session based .jsp example) fails, while 4
>> (fremarker) works fine
>> - field Validators with client-side JavaScript does no client side
>> validation, same with Validation (client) and Validation (client using
>> css_xhtml theme) (tested with Glassfish V2 / Firefox 3 / Ubuntu Hardy)
>> - Person Manager / create person is broken
>>
>
> These examples are working for me, except Person Manager which is
> indeed broken. Can anybody double check these examples? If they are
> working fine then we can fix the doc zip "by hand".
> musachy
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
> the wikidocs export seems to be missing both in the struts-2.1.6-all.zip
> struts-2.1.6-docs.zip. The good news is that this does not mean that a new
> release process has to be triggered afaik, since these are artifacts which
> can be changed easily before final distribution (which is not the case for
> maven artifacts). This should really be fixed before release.
>
That's a nice catch!. It is kind of weird, I looked at the box where I
built the release and docs.zip is under assembly/target, but I
couldn't unzip it:
% unzip docs.zip
Archive: docs.zip
End-of-central-directory signature not found. Either this file is not
a zipfile, or it constitutes one disk of a multi-part archive. In the
latter case the central directory and zipfile comment will be found on
the last disk(s) of this archive.
unzip: cannot find zipfile directory in one of docs.zip or
docs.zip.zip, and cannot find docs.zip.ZIP, period.
The zip is fine in 2.1.3 but it is broken in 2.1.4, 2.1.5, and 2.1.6.
Also the cwiki zip (http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs.zip) seems
right, so I don't have any explanation for this.
> Minor findings in showcase:
> - token example 3 (token-session based .jsp example) fails, while 4
> (fremarker) works fine
> - field Validators with client-side JavaScript does no client side
> validation, same with Validation (client) and Validation (client using
> css_xhtml theme) (tested with Glassfish V2 / Firefox 3 / Ubuntu Hardy)
> - Person Manager / create person is broken
>
These examples are working for me, except Person Manager which is
indeed broken. Can anybody double check these examples? If they are
working fine then we can fix the doc zip "by hand".
musachy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Rene Gielen <rg...@apache.org>.
Guys,
the wikidocs export seems to be missing both in the struts-2.1.6-all.zip
struts-2.1.6-docs.zip. The good news is that this does not mean that a
new release process has to be triggered afaik, since these are artifacts
which can be changed easily before final distribution (which is not the
case for maven artifacts). This should really be fixed before release.
Minor findings in showcase:
- token example 3 (token-session based .jsp example) fails, while 4
(fremarker) works fine
- field Validators with client-side JavaScript does no client side
validation, same with Validation (client) and Validation (client using
css_xhtml theme) (tested with Glassfish V2 / Firefox 3 / Ubuntu Hardy)
- Person Manager / create person is broken
Most of the these are good to fix in next relase, only the client
validation stuff might be a stopping reason. Maybe someone could
crosscheck - if it's broken in general, we should think of fixing it
before a release.
I think we also need a nice and handy "press compatible" release note,
which gives a good overview on 2.1 enhancements over 2.0 and why this
makes it the #1, most advanced action framework available :)
So far for now,
- Rene
Musachy Barroso schrieb:
> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>
> Distribution:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> to help do the work
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net> wrote:
> AFAIK it's basically up to you to decide when the vote closes, as long it
> has a minimun lifetime of 72h
I saw what you did there ;). Ok, we will add 72 hours to the vote,
more upon request.
musachy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Rene Gielen <gi...@it-neering.net>.
AFAIK it's basically up to you to decide when the vote closes, as long it
has a minimun lifetime of 72h
I hope I will be able to check later this week, for now work piles up high
after returning from vacation. Nevertheless, great job so far, Musachy! :)
- Rene
Am Mi, 7.01.2009, 14:22, schrieb Musachy Barroso:
> Is there any procedure to extend the vote? I have no problem adding
> more time to it.
>
> musachy
>
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>> +1 for 1-2 day extension, I won't be able to look at it until tomorrow
>> (still recovering from not having internet for nearly a week).
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> Wes Wannemacher wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not sure exactly how much time has passed, but I plan to fully test
>>> and I am not sure if I'll be able to do so within the 72 hour window...
>>> Consider this a request to extend the voting period.
>>>
>>> -Wes
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 20:25 -0500, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1 GA
>>>>
>>>> musachy
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>>>>>
>>>>> Release notes:
>>>>> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>>>>>
>>>>> Distribution:
>>>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>>>>>
>>>>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>>>> *
>>>>> [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>>>>>
>>>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>>>>> with a vote on its quality:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>>>> [ ] Alpha
>>>>> [ ] Beta
>>>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>>>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>>>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>>>>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>>>>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>>>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>>>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>>>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>>>>> list.
>>>>>
>>>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>>>>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>>>>> to help do the work
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
René Gielen
IT-Neering.net
Saarstrasse 100, 52062 Aachen, Germany
Tel: +49-(0)241-4010770
Fax: +49-(0)241-4010771
Cel: +49-(0)177-3194448
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
Is there any procedure to extend the vote? I have no problem adding
more time to it.
musachy
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> +1 for 1-2 day extension, I won't be able to look at it until tomorrow
> (still recovering from not having internet for nearly a week).
>
> Dave
>
> Wes Wannemacher wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure exactly how much time has passed, but I plan to fully test
>> and I am not sure if I'll be able to do so within the 72 hour window...
>> Consider this a request to extend the voting period.
>>
>> -Wes
>>
>> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 20:25 -0500, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is my +1 GA
>>>
>>> musachy
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>>>>
>>>> Release notes:
>>>> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>>>>
>>>> Distribution:
>>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>>>>
>>>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>>>>
>>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>>>> with a vote on its quality:
>>>>
>>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>>> [ ] Alpha
>>>> [ ] Beta
>>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>>
>>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>>>
>>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>>>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>>>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>>>> list.
>>>>
>>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>>>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>>>> to help do the work
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Dave Newton <ne...@yahoo.com>.
+1 for 1-2 day extension, I won't be able to look at it until tomorrow
(still recovering from not having internet for nearly a week).
Dave
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> I'm not sure exactly how much time has passed, but I plan to fully test
> and I am not sure if I'll be able to do so within the 72 hour window...
> Consider this a request to extend the voting period.
>
> -Wes
>
> On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 20:25 -0500, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>> Here is my +1 GA
>>
>> musachy
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>>>
>>> Release notes:
>>> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>>>
>>> Distribution:
>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>>>
>>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>>>
>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>>> with a vote on its quality:
>>>
>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>
>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>>
>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>>> list.
>>>
>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>>> to help do the work
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com>.
I'm not sure exactly how much time has passed, but I plan to fully test
and I am not sure if I'll be able to do so within the 72 hour window...
Consider this a request to extend the voting period.
-Wes
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 20:25 -0500, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Here is my +1 GA
>
> musachy
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
> >
> > Release notes:
> > * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
> >
> > Distribution:
> > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
> >
> > Maven 2 staging repository:
> > * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
> >
> > Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> > with a vote on its quality:
> >
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [ ] General Availability (GA)
> >
> > Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> > members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> > three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
> >
> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> > A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> > of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> > designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> > mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> > beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> > list.
> >
> > As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> > vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> > to help do the work
> >
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
Here is my +1 GA
musachy
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>
> Distribution:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> to help do the work
>
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Al Sutton <al...@funkyandroid.com>.
+1 to Musachy being da man!
(and 2.1.6 seems to be working fine with my webapp so +1 GA for what
it's worth :)).
Al.
James Holmes wrote:
> +1 GA that is!
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:10 PM, James Holmes <ja...@jamesholmes.com> wrote:
>
>
>> +1
>>
>> You da man!
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>>>
>>> Release notes:
>>> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>>>
>>> Distribution:
>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>>>
>>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>>>
>>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>>> with a vote on its quality:
>>>
>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>
>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>>
>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>>> list.
>>>
>>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>>> to help do the work
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by James Holmes <ja...@jamesholmes.com>.
+1 GA that is!
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 2:10 PM, James Holmes <ja...@jamesholmes.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> You da man!
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>>
>> Release notes:
>> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>>
>> Distribution:
>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>>
>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>>
>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>> with a vote on its quality:
>>
>> [ ] Leave at test build
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>
>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>
>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>> list.
>>
>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>> to help do the work
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by James Holmes <ja...@jamesholmes.com>.
+1
You da man!
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>
> Distribution:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> to help do the work
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Al Sutton <al...@funkyandroid.com>.
After some testing 2.1.6 is being used behind the production deployments
for andappstore.com. I'll shout if anything comes up.
Al.
Rainer Hermanns wrote:
> +1 GA
> Great job Musachy, thanks!
>
> cheers,
> Rainer
>
>
>> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>>
>> Release notes:
>> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>>
>> Distribution:
>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>>
>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>>
>> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>> with a vote on its quality:
>>
>> [ ] Leave at test build
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>
>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>
>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
>> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
>> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
>> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
>> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
>> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
>> list.
>>
>> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
>> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
>> to help do the work
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
======
Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
company number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
152-160 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK.
The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
subsidiaries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Rainer Hermanns <he...@aixcept.de>.
+1 GA
Great job Musachy, thanks!
cheers,
Rainer
> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>
> Distribution:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> to help do the work
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
Rainer Hermanns
aixcept
Willibrordstraße 82
52134 Herzogenrath - Germany
w: http://aixcept.de/
t: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 11
f: +49 - 2406 - 979 22 13
m: +49 - 170 - 343 29 12
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Philip Luppens <ph...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>
> Distribution:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
+1 GA. Thanks a lot, Musachy.
Phil
--
"We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand." -
Randy Pausch
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by "matt.payne" <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 here
Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>
> Distribution:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-repository/]
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> to help do the work
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Struts-2.1.6-Quality-tp21300412p21381002.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by dusty <du...@yahoo.com>.
+1 GA
Thanks Musachy!
Musachy Barroso wrote:
>
>> REMINDER: the struts-2.1 DTD should be published at
>> http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.1.dtd
>>
> Good thing that you mentioned it. I added it to
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/site/pom.xml
>
> thanks
> musachy
> --
> "Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Struts-2.1.6-Quality-tp21300412p21354516.html
Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com>.
> REMINDER: the struts-2.1 DTD should be published at
> http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.1.dtd
>
Good thing that you mentioned it. I added it to
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/site/pom.xml
thanks
musachy
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?" Pink Floyd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Jeromy Evans <je...@blueskyminds.com.au>.
+1 GA
Thanks Musachy.
REMINDER: the struts-2.1 DTD should be published at http://struts.apache.org/dtds/struts-2.1.dtd
Note: the wiki contains a page about migrating applications from 2.0.x
to 2.1x. If anyone has any improvements please include them. It's
referenced in the release notes.
http://cwiki.apache.org/S2WIKI/troubleshooting-guide-migrating-from-struts-20x-to-21x.html
On 06/01/2009, at 9:06 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>
> Release notes:
> * [http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-216.html]
>
> Distribution:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/]
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
> * [http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.6/m2-staging-
> repository/]
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request.
> A vote can be amended at any time to upgrade or downgrade the quality
> of the release based on future experience. If an initial vote
> designates the build as "Beta", the release will be submitted for
> mirroring and announced to the user list. Once released as a public
> beta, subsequent quality votes on a build may be held on the user
> list.
>
> As always, the act of voting carries certain obligations. A binding
> vote not only states an opinion, but means that the voter is agreeing
> to help do the work
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by Al Sutton <al...@funkyandroid.com>.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/struts-dev/200805.mbox/%3c92544c510805150723h423f6dedo2b5cbd2c83b4b915@mail.gmail.com%3e
Al.
GF wrote:
> I checked by my self.
> Luckily you updated to 2.3.13 because previous ones had very big
> issues about locking and performance
> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/versions_2_3_13.html
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:43 PM, GF <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Which freemarker version is included in this struts?
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
--
======
Funky Android Limited is registered in England & Wales with the
company number 6741909. The registered head office is Kemp House,
152-160 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX, UK.
The views expressed in this email are those of the author and not
necessarily those of Funky Android Limited, it's associates, or it's
subsidiaries.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by GF <ga...@gmail.com>.
I checked by my self.
Luckily you updated to 2.3.13 because previous ones had very big
issues about locking and performance
http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/versions_2_3_13.html
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:43 PM, GF <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Which freemarker version is included in this struts?
>
> On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality
Posted by GF <ga...@gmail.com>.
Which freemarker version is included in this struts?
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Musachy Barroso <mu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org