You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> on 2007/10/03 02:08:01 UTC
Is the IFX license compatible to be included in our test case?
Hi,
TUSCANY-1814 contains a test case which includes IFX XSDs. The IFX license
can be found at http://www.ifxforum.org/standards/standard/license. Do you
see any legal issues to include the XSDs in our test case?
If it's a concern, then we can try to produce a dummy monster XSD for the
purpose of memory footprint measurement.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sunny Ip (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>
To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 3:56 PM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1814) Large memory footprint with large
wsdl/schemas
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531943 ]
>
> Sunny Ip commented on TUSCANY-1814:
> -----------------------------------
>
> And regarding the IFX license, here is a link to IFX's license agreement:
>
> http://www.ifxforum.org/standards/standard/license
>
> I am unfamiliar with the Apache license, does this look acceptable for
> what we need?
>
>> Large memory footprint with large wsdl/schemas
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>> Key: TUSCANY-1814
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1814
>> Project: Tuscany
>> Issue Type: Bug
>> Components: Java SCA Data Binding Runtime
>> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0
>> Environment: Windows/Tomcat
>> Reporter: Sunny Ip
>> Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
>>
>> Attachments: Memory Footprint (Startup Profile).png, wsdl.zip
>>
>>
>> Creating services and components based on large wsdl/schemas (SDO
>> generation/databinding, ws binding, etc.) results in very high memory
>> footprint. Attaching sample wsdls that make use of the very large schema
>> that we are using.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
Re: Is the IFX license compatible to be included in our test case?
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
It only allows "development of software and/or data compilations which
facilitate electronic transmission of information in accordance with the
Specification and otherwise implement the Specification in user's products"
so maybe you could argue using the its xsd in a memory footprint test isn't
quite what they had in mind :) Thats likely being a bit pedantic, it looks
mostly ok to me, it allows things like derivative works, redistribution
etc. Could ask on the legal discuss list, but, if it is possible to create
our own large xsd without too much work i'd be slightly more in favor of
doing that just to avoid all the extra work getting the LICENSE and NOTICE
files updated and also to avoid any possible release review questions.
...ant
On 10/3/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> TUSCANY-1814 contains a test case which includes IFX XSDs. The IFX license
> can be found at http://www.ifxforum.org/standards/standard/license. Do you
> see any legal issues to include the XSDs in our test case?
>
> If it's a concern, then we can try to produce a dummy monster XSD for the
> purpose of memory footprint measurement.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sunny Ip (JIRA)" <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> To: <tu...@ws.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 3:56 PM
> Subject: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1814) Large memory footprint with
> large
> wsdl/schemas
>
>
> >
> > [
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1814?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12531943]
> >
> > Sunny Ip commented on TUSCANY-1814:
> > -----------------------------------
> >
> > And regarding the IFX license, here is a link to IFX's license
> agreement:
> >
> > http://www.ifxforum.org/standards/standard/license
> >
> > I am unfamiliar with the Apache license, does this look acceptable for
> > what we need?
> >
> >> Large memory footprint with large wsdl/schemas
> >> ----------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Key: TUSCANY-1814
> >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1814
> >> Project: Tuscany
> >> Issue Type: Bug
> >> Components: Java SCA Data Binding Runtime
> >> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.0
> >> Environment: Windows/Tomcat
> >> Reporter: Sunny Ip
> >> Fix For: Java-SCA-Next
> >>
> >> Attachments: Memory Footprint (Startup Profile).png, wsdl.zip
> >>
> >>
> >> Creating services and components based on large wsdl/schemas (SDO
> >> generation/databinding, ws binding, etc.) results in very high memory
> >> footprint. Attaching sample wsdls that make use of the very large
> schema
> >> that we are using.
> >
> > --
> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > -
> > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>
Re: Is the IFX license compatible to be included in our test case?
Posted by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com>.
Raymond,
Raymond Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> TUSCANY-1814 contains a test case which includes IFX XSDs. The IFX
> license can be found at
> http://www.ifxforum.org/standards/standard/license. Do you see any legal
> issues to include the XSDs in our test case?
In general, it looks OK for our purposes but it is as well to check this
with the Apache folk who worry about licensing and legal issues.
>
> If it's a concern, then we can try to produce a dummy monster XSD for
> the purpose of memory footprint measurement.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
Yours, Mike.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org