You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-user@hadoop.apache.org by Dan Diephouse <da...@netzooid.com> on 2009/01/19 17:12:49 UTC
Windows Support
I recognize that Windows support is, um, limited :-) But, any ideas what
exactly would need to be changed to support Windows (without cygwin) if
someone such as myself were so motivated? The most immediate thing I ran
into was the UserGroupInformation which would need a windows implementation.
I see there is an issue to switch to JAAS too, which may be the proper fix?
Are there lots of other things that would need to be changed?
I think it may be worth opening a JIRA for windows support and creating some
subtasks for the various issues, even if no one tackles them quite yet.
Thanks,
Dan
--
Dan Diephouse
http://netzooid.com/blog
Re: Windows Support
Posted by Chris K Wensel <ch...@wensel.net>.
Hey Dan
There is discussion/issue on this here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4998
ckw
On Jan 19, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Dan Diephouse wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Dan Diephouse wrote:
>>
>>> I recognize that Windows support is, um, limited :-) But, any
>>> ideas what
>>> exactly would need to be changed to support Windows (without
>>> cygwin) if
>>> someone such as myself were so motivated? The most immediate thing
>>> I ran
>>> into was the UserGroupInformation which would need a windows
>>> implementation.
>>> I see there is an issue to switch to JAAS too, which may be the
>>> proper
>>> fix?
>>> Are there lots of other things that would need to be changed?
>>>
>>> I think it may be worth opening a JIRA for windows support and
>>> creating
>>> some
>>> subtasks for the various issues, even if no one tackles them quite
>>> yet.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>> I think a key one you need to address is motiviation. Is cygwin
>> that bad
>> for a piece of server-side code?
>>
>
> No.... I guess I was trying to get an idea of how much work it was.
> It seems
> easy enough to supply a WindowsUserGroupInformation class (or a
> platform
> agnostic one). I wondered how many other things like this there
> were before
> I put together a patch. Seems bad Java practices to depend on shell
> utilities :-). Not very platform agnostic...
> Dan
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> http://netzooid.com/blog
--
Chris K Wensel
chris@wensel.net
http://www.cascading.org/
http://www.scaleunlimited.com/
Re: Windows Support
Posted by Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com>.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> Dan Diephouse wrote:
>
>> I recognize that Windows support is, um, limited :-) But, any ideas what
>> exactly would need to be changed to support Windows (without cygwin) if
>> someone such as myself were so motivated? The most immediate thing I ran
>> into was the UserGroupInformation which would need a windows
>> implementation.
>> I see there is an issue to switch to JAAS too, which may be the proper
>> fix?
>> Are there lots of other things that would need to be changed?
>>
>> I think it may be worth opening a JIRA for windows support and creating
>> some
>> subtasks for the various issues, even if no one tackles them quite yet.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dan
>>
>>
> I think a key one you need to address is motiviation. Is cygwin that bad
> for a piece of server-side code?
>
No.... I guess I was trying to get an idea of how much work it was. It seems
easy enough to supply a WindowsUserGroupInformation class (or a platform
agnostic one). I wondered how many other things like this there were before
I put together a patch. Seems bad Java practices to depend on shell
utilities :-). Not very platform agnostic...
Dan
--
Dan Diephouse
http://netzooid.com/blog
Re: Windows Support
Posted by Steve Loughran <st...@apache.org>.
Dan Diephouse wrote:
> I recognize that Windows support is, um, limited :-) But, any ideas what
> exactly would need to be changed to support Windows (without cygwin) if
> someone such as myself were so motivated? The most immediate thing I ran
> into was the UserGroupInformation which would need a windows implementation.
> I see there is an issue to switch to JAAS too, which may be the proper fix?
> Are there lots of other things that would need to be changed?
>
> I think it may be worth opening a JIRA for windows support and creating some
> subtasks for the various issues, even if no one tackles them quite yet.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
I think a key one you need to address is motiviation. Is cygwin that bad
for a piece of server-side code?