You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@allura.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2014/03/03 14:56:33 UTC
Re: Discuss: Ready to graduate?
On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net> wrote:
> On 2/27/14 7:40 PM, Wayne Witzel III wrote:
>> I think it is a great idea. +1
>>
>
> There are two documents that explain graduation readiness and policies. Guide:
> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#requirements Official
> Policy:
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator
>
> I think we're all set from the legal side (code grants, license, dependencies,
> etc). We've made two successful releases. For meritocracy/community I must be
> forthright and say that we are not in as good a situation as I would like, but
> perhaps it is solid enough for graduation:
>
I would agree; it would be even better if the ASF used
us more.
Re: Discuss: Ready to graduate?
Posted by Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>.
2014-03-05 14:56 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>:
> Although not a committer, I am willing to stay on
> as a member-lurker on the PMC.
>
Cool, added you right away.
> On Mar 4, 2014, at 12:16 PM, Roberto Galoppini <
> roberto.galoppini@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the clarification Jim.
> >
> > For committers, while you're at casting your vote if you do not want to
> be
> > part of the new PMC please speak up, otherwise by saying +1 you're also
> > saying you'd like to be part of the new PMC.
> >
> > Sorry for the confusion.
> >
> > Roberto
> >
> >
> > 2014-03-04 15:45 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>:
> >
> >> It's most likely better to ask...
> >>
> >> No worries! :)
> >>
> >> On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Roberto Galoppini <
> roberto.galoppini@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 2014-03-04 15:17 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mar 3, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Roberto Galoppini <
> >> roberto.galoppini@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yea, we need a name for our VP, and it seems to me you're the natural
> >>>>> candidate!
> >>>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>>> Going to craft a VOTE mail right away, time flies...
> >>>>
> >>>> Are you going to ask who wishes to stay on in the new PMC?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Actually I made the assumption that all committers would have liked to
> be
> >>> part of it, all in all we could add more people over time if we do
> >>> graduate... or you think it would be more appropriate to ask first?
> >> Pardon
> >>> me but my experience with the graduation process is limited, every
> >>> suggestion is more than welcome.
> >>>
> >>> Roberto
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Discuss: Ready to graduate?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
Although not a committer, I am willing to stay on
as a member-lurker on the PMC.
On Mar 4, 2014, at 12:16 PM, Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification Jim.
>
> For committers, while you're at casting your vote if you do not want to be
> part of the new PMC please speak up, otherwise by saying +1 you're also
> saying you'd like to be part of the new PMC.
>
> Sorry for the confusion.
>
> Roberto
>
>
> 2014-03-04 15:45 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>:
>
>> It's most likely better to ask...
>>
>> No worries! :)
>>
>> On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 2014-03-04 15:17 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 3, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Roberto Galoppini <
>> roberto.galoppini@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yea, we need a name for our VP, and it seems to me you're the natural
>>>>> candidate!
>>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>>> Going to craft a VOTE mail right away, time flies...
>>>>
>>>> Are you going to ask who wishes to stay on in the new PMC?
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually I made the assumption that all committers would have liked to be
>>> part of it, all in all we could add more people over time if we do
>>> graduate... or you think it would be more appropriate to ask first?
>> Pardon
>>> me but my experience with the graduation process is limited, every
>>> suggestion is more than welcome.
>>>
>>> Roberto
>>
>>
Re: Discuss: Ready to graduate?
Posted by Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the clarification Jim.
For committers, while you're at casting your vote if you do not want to be
part of the new PMC please speak up, otherwise by saying +1 you're also
saying you'd like to be part of the new PMC.
Sorry for the confusion.
Roberto
2014-03-04 15:45 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>:
> It's most likely better to ask...
>
> No worries! :)
>
> On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > 2014-03-04 15:17 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>:
> >
> >>
> >> On Mar 3, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Roberto Galoppini <
> roberto.galoppini@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Yea, we need a name for our VP, and it seems to me you're the natural
> >>> candidate!
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >>> Going to craft a VOTE mail right away, time flies...
> >>
> >> Are you going to ask who wishes to stay on in the new PMC?
> >
> >
> > Actually I made the assumption that all committers would have liked to be
> > part of it, all in all we could add more people over time if we do
> > graduate... or you think it would be more appropriate to ask first?
> Pardon
> > me but my experience with the graduation process is limited, every
> > suggestion is more than welcome.
> >
> > Roberto
>
>
Re: Discuss: Ready to graduate?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
It's most likely better to ask...
No worries! :)
On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:26 AM, Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014-03-04 15:17 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>:
>
>>
>> On Mar 3, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yea, we need a name for our VP, and it seems to me you're the natural
>>> candidate!
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> Going to craft a VOTE mail right away, time flies...
>>
>> Are you going to ask who wishes to stay on in the new PMC?
>
>
> Actually I made the assumption that all committers would have liked to be
> part of it, all in all we could add more people over time if we do
> graduate... or you think it would be more appropriate to ask first? Pardon
> me but my experience with the graduation process is limited, every
> suggestion is more than welcome.
>
> Roberto
Re: Discuss: Ready to graduate?
Posted by Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>.
2014-03-04 15:17 GMT+01:00 Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com>:
>
> On Mar 3, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Yea, we need a name for our VP, and it seems to me you're the natural
> > candidate!
>
> +1
>
> > Going to craft a VOTE mail right away, time flies...
>
> Are you going to ask who wishes to stay on in the new PMC?
Actually I made the assumption that all committers would have liked to be
part of it, all in all we could add more people over time if we do
graduate... or you think it would be more appropriate to ask first? Pardon
me but my experience with the graduation process is limited, every
suggestion is more than welcome.
Roberto
Re: Discuss: Ready to graduate?
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Mar 3, 2014, at 4:12 PM, Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>
> Yea, we need a name for our VP, and it seems to me you're the natural
> candidate!
+1
> Going to craft a VOTE mail right away, time flies...
Are you going to ask who wishes to stay on in the new PMC?
Re: Discuss: Ready to graduate?
Posted by Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>.
On 3/3/14 4:12 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote:
> 2014-03-03 19:00 GMT+01:00 Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>:
>
>> On 3/3/14 9:44 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/03/2014 08:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>>> On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2/27/14 7:40 PM, Wayne Witzel III wrote:
>>>>>> I think it is a great idea. +1
>>>>>>
>>>>> There are two documents that explain graduation readiness and
>> policies. Guide:
>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#requirements
>> Official
>>>>> Policy:
>>>>>
>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I think we're all set from the legal side (code grants, license,
>> dependencies,
>>>>> etc). We've made two successful releases. For meritocracy/community
>> I must be
>>>>> forthright and say that we are not in as good a situation as I would
>> like, but
>>>>> perhaps it is solid enough for graduation:
>>>>>
>>>> I would agree; it would be even better if the ASF used
>>>> us more.
>>> Can someone volunteer to send the necessary vote emails to get this
>> running? The
>>> March board meeting is two weeks from Wednesday - we could just barely
>> squeak in
>>> if everything went perfectly.
>>>
>>> --Rich
>>>
>>
>> Anyone else have any points of discussion before voting commences?
>>
>
> Yea, we need a name for our VP, and it seems to me you're the natural
> candidate!
> Going to craft a VOTE mail right away, time flies...
>
> Roberto
>
I would be fine with that. I'd also support anyone else that would want to
stand for VP.
--
Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
<><
Re: Discuss: Ready to graduate?
Posted by Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>.
2014-03-03 19:00 GMT+01:00 Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>:
> On 3/3/14 9:44 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> >
> > On 03/03/2014 08:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2/27/14 7:40 PM, Wayne Witzel III wrote:
> >>>> I think it is a great idea. +1
> >>>>
> >>> There are two documents that explain graduation readiness and
> policies. Guide:
> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#requirements
> Official
> >>> Policy:
> >>>
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I think we're all set from the legal side (code grants, license,
> dependencies,
> >>> etc). We've made two successful releases. For meritocracy/community
> I must be
> >>> forthright and say that we are not in as good a situation as I would
> like, but
> >>> perhaps it is solid enough for graduation:
> >>>
> >> I would agree; it would be even better if the ASF used
> >> us more.
> > Can someone volunteer to send the necessary vote emails to get this
> running? The
> > March board meeting is two weeks from Wednesday - we could just barely
> squeak in
> > if everything went perfectly.
> >
> > --Rich
> >
>
> Anyone else have any points of discussion before voting commences?
>
Yea, we need a name for our VP, and it seems to me you're the natural
candidate!
Going to craft a VOTE mail right away, time flies...
Roberto
>
> I also note that our podling report is due in two days, Mar 5. We should
> have
> someone write that up with a comment about graduation and we can update it
> last-minute as needed and allowed.
>
>
> --
> Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
> http://www.brondsema.net : personal
> http://www.splike.com : programming
> <><
>
Re: Discuss: Ready to graduate?
Posted by Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net>.
On 3/3/14 9:44 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
> On 03/03/2014 08:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/27/14 7:40 PM, Wayne Witzel III wrote:
>>>> I think it is a great idea. +1
>>>>
>>> There are two documents that explain graduation readiness and policies. Guide:
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#requirements Official
>>> Policy:
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator
>>>
>>>
>>> I think we're all set from the legal side (code grants, license, dependencies,
>>> etc). We've made two successful releases. For meritocracy/community I must be
>>> forthright and say that we are not in as good a situation as I would like, but
>>> perhaps it is solid enough for graduation:
>>>
>> I would agree; it would be even better if the ASF used
>> us more.
> Can someone volunteer to send the necessary vote emails to get this running? The
> March board meeting is two weeks from Wednesday - we could just barely squeak in
> if everything went perfectly.
>
> --Rich
>
Anyone else have any points of discussion before voting commences?
I also note that our podling report is due in two days, Mar 5. We should have
someone write that up with a comment about graduation and we can update it
last-minute as needed and allowed.
--
Dave Brondsema : dave@brondsema.net
http://www.brondsema.net : personal
http://www.splike.com : programming
<><
Re: Discuss: Ready to graduate?
Posted by Rich Bowen <rb...@rcbowen.com>.
On 03/03/2014 08:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Feb 28, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Dave Brondsema <da...@brondsema.net> wrote:
>
>> On 2/27/14 7:40 PM, Wayne Witzel III wrote:
>>> I think it is a great idea. +1
>>>
>> There are two documents that explain graduation readiness and policies. Guide:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#requirements Official
>> Policy:
>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator
>>
>> I think we're all set from the legal side (code grants, license, dependencies,
>> etc). We've made two successful releases. For meritocracy/community I must be
>> forthright and say that we are not in as good a situation as I would like, but
>> perhaps it is solid enough for graduation:
>>
> I would agree; it would be even better if the ASF used
> us more.
Can someone volunteer to send the necessary vote emails to get this
running? The March board meeting is two weeks from Wednesday - we could
just barely squeak in if everything went perfectly.
--Rich
--
Rich Bowen - rbowen@rcbowen.com - @rbowen
http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon