You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@avalon.apache.org by Paul Hammant <Pa...@yahoo.com> on 2002/02/22 13:31:31 UTC

ServiceManager is use.

Thanks to Stephen, Leo, Berin, Peter, Mark, Antti, Paulo, for 
Servicable/ServiceManager.

It is in use for EOB ( http://eob.sourceforge.net/ ) and working well. 
 I have been able to delete code from EOB because of it.

--

Question we have DefaultServiceManager in the same package as 
ServiceManager.  This is generally repeated for much of framework and 
others. If we had our time again would be package and jar separate 
interface and impl?  Sort of practice what we preach...

- Paul


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: ServiceManager is use.

Posted by Peter Donald <pe...@apache.org>.

On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 23:31, Paul Hammant wrote:
> It is in use for EOB ( http://eob.sourceforge.net/ ) and working well.
>  I have been able to delete code from EOB because of it.

If they are just lightweight basic implementations then I don't see any need. 
If they were complex or large such as the ECM then they should go in 
excalibur.

-- 
Cheers,

Pete

-----------------------------------------------------------
 Don't take life too seriously -- 
                          you'll never get out of it alive.
-----------------------------------------------------------

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>