You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2017/01/21 08:45:28 UTC
[Bug 60620] New: [JRE] Memory leak found in
java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60620
Bug ID: 60620
Summary: [JRE] Memory leak found in
java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.0.M15
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Catalina
Assignee: dev@tomcat.apache.org
Reporter: knst.kolinko@gmail.com
Target Milestone: -----
Filing a bug for an already fixed issue, to summarize discussions spawned
across different mailing lists, and for better changelog.
See "Tomcat 8, 8.5 and 9 returning another apps environment with
context.lookup() from a .parallelStream()", 2017-01-08 on users@
http://markmail.org/message/qcy6rqhw52sspyv7
See "Memory leak found in java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool", 2017-01-09 on
dev@
http://markmail.org/message/7w5wspqeayx7dr5x
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 60620] [JRE] Memory leak found in
java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60620
Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> ---
Fixed in r1780268 for 8.0.42 onwards.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 60620] [JRE] Memory leak found in
java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60620
Konstantin Kolinko <kn...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OS| |All
--- Comment #1 from Konstantin Kolinko <kn...@gmail.com> ---
A workaround for this Oracle JRE bug was added to memory leaks protection code
in Tomcat 7.0.74 (r1778068), 8.5.11 (r1778065), 9.0.0.M17 (r1778061)
The fix has not been applied to Tomcat 8.0 yet.
Note that compilation of SafeForkJoinWorkerThreadFactory requires Java 7 and
later. People who use two separate Eclipse projects for Tomcat 7 (separating
code that requires java 6 and java 7 into different projects) need to update
their include / exclude patterns.
The sample projects were updated in r1779707, to be in 7.0.76.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
[Bug 60620] [JRE] Memory leak found in
java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60620
Konstantin Kolinko <kn...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|Catalina |Catalina
Target Milestone|----- |----
Product|Tomcat 9 |Tomcat 8
Version|9.0.0.M15 |8.0.39
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Kolinko <kn...@gmail.com> ---
Moving the issue to Tomcat 8.0, as the fix has not been applied there yet.
As a variant, we can add the helper class but keep the protection feature off
by default. This may wait a while, to get more feedback.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org