You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/04/02 20:05:32 UTC

[jira] Commented: (CAMEL-426) splitter() should have the same parallel processing functionality that multicast() has

    [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=41974#action_41974 ] 

Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-426:
-----------------------------------

Roman, remember to update the wiki with the new "true" parameter. We need the wiki documentation to shine and that users will be able to see what features and options Camel really has.

> splitter() should have the same parallel processing functionality that multicast() has
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-426
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-426
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core
>            Reporter: Roman Kalukiewicz
>            Assignee: Roman Kalukiewicz
>
> Ability to have
> {code}
> from("direct:parallel").splitter(body().tokenize(","), true).to("mock:result");
> {code}
> where {{true}} parameter to splitter should behave like in {{multicast()}} --- processing is done in separate threads for each 'part'.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.