You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by "Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/04/03 18:46:13 UTC
[jira] Updated: (TAP5-619) Add parameter to PropertyEditor to allow
custom BeanBlockSource to be used in place of the default one
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Howard M. Lewis Ship updated TAP5-619:
--------------------------------------
Summary: Add parameter to PropertyEditor to allow custom BeanBlockSource to be used in place of the default one (was: Provide way to override PropertyEditor.beanBlockSource)
> Add parameter to PropertyEditor to allow custom BeanBlockSource to be used in place of the default one
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TAP5-619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-619
> Project: Tapestry 5
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: tapestry-core
> Affects Versions: 5.1.0.1
> Reporter: Alfie Kirkpatrick
> Assignee: Howard M. Lewis Ship
> Priority: Minor
>
> I am building a search form and would like to override the default edit blocks with search-style ones. This is conjunction with a HashMap<String, Object> backed bean model. As an example, for dates I want to have a date range block which sends back a start/end range for a date, possibly as a DateRangeSearchTerm against the property name in the hashmap. The search implementation will then know how to convert this into a query to the backend.
> I might be pushing the whole BeanEditModel/Conduit framework further than intended? However, doing it this way provides some nice ways to override an auto-built form, eg. by restricting/reordering the properties or by overriding specific blocks even further.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.