What happened to 2.0's -D?

[Manoj Kasichainula <ma...@raleigh.ibm.com>]

What happened to 2.0's -D option? I see nothing in the logs for
http_main.c to indicate that this was done on purpose.

-- 
Manoj Kasichainula - manojk@raleigh.ibm.com
IBM, Apache Development

Re: What happened to 2.0's -D?

[Manoj Kasichainula <ma...@io.com>]

On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 11:13:46PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> It uses environment variables instead.

And that getenv() was staring me in the face too. Blah.

-- 
Manoj Kasichainula - manojk at io dot com - http://www.io.com/~manojk/

Re: What happened to 2.0's -D?

[Ben Laurie <be...@algroup.co.uk>]

Manoj Kasichainula wrote:
> 
> What happened to 2.0's -D option? I see nothing in the logs for
> http_main.c to indicate that this was done on purpose.

It uses environment variables instead.

Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
     - Indira Gandhi

Re: What happened to 2.0's -D?

[Ben Hyde <bh...@pobox.com>]

Manoj Kasichainula <ma...@raleigh.ibm.com> writes:
> What happened to 2.0's -D option? I see nothing in the logs for
> http_main.c to indicate that this was done on purpose.

Yeah, that needs work...  - ben