You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by "Ralph Goers (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/10/13 06:32:05 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LOG4J2-1121) LoggerConfig performance improvement: remove waitForCompletion and associated fields

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14954360#comment-14954360 ] 

Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1121:
-------------------------------------

The fix for this issue almost certainly resolves LOG4J-702

> LoggerConfig performance improvement: remove waitForCompletion and associated fields
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-1121
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1121
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 2.3
>            Reporter: Remko Popma
>            Assignee: Remko Popma
>             Fix For: 2.4
>
>
> This ticket follows up on LOG4J2-1120. Out of the three changes identified in LOG4J2-1120, only two could be implemented in time for the 2.4 release.
> This ticket tracks the remaining work for the third change:
> * Since {{clearAppenders()}} is only called after all appenders have been stopped, {{waitForCompletion()}} may no longer be necessary (unless I am missing something here). If so, the {{shutdownLock}}, {{shutdown}} and {{counter}} fields can be removed. Not incrementing the atomic counters with every event in the hot path should give better performance.
> LOG4J2-1120 shows benchmark results that support this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org