You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@whirr.apache.org by Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> on 2011/07/22 03:33:18 UTC
Towards Whirr 0.6
I believe we are getting close to the point were we can make a new
release (the last one was on 03 / Jun / 11).
Some of the issues we should focus to make this happen are:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-334
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-240
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-339
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-189
If we address those I believe it's enough for a new release. What do you think?
As Tom suggested in a previous email we should also do some more work on:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-189 (ready?)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-294
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-325 (I believe it needs
jclouds 1.1.0)
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-276
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-255 (Adrian any feedback
on this? BTW did you knew about Puppet CloudPack [1]? )
What else should we add to this short list? I've missed something important?
[1] http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/cloud_pack_getting_started.html
Cheers,
-- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro
Re: Towards Whirr 0.6
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
Could you please add WHIRR-350 to 0.6?
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Tom White <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I believe we are getting close to the point were we can make a new
>> release (the last one was on 03 / Jun / 11).
>>
>> Some of the issues we should focus to make this happen are:
>>
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-334
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-240
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-339
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-189
>>
>> If we address those I believe it's enough for a new release. What do you think?
>
> Thanks for bringing this up. Yes, I think these JIRAs would be
> sufficient. The items below would be nice to have, but shouldn't block
> a release IMO.
>
> Cheers,
> Tom
>
>>
>> As Tom suggested in a previous email we should also do some more work on:
>>
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-189 (ready?)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-294
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-325 (I believe it needs
>> jclouds 1.1.0)
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-276
>> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-255 (Adrian any feedback
>> on this? BTW did you knew about Puppet CloudPack [1]? )
>>
>> What else should we add to this short list? I've missed something important?
>>
>> [1] http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/cloud_pack_getting_started.html
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro
>>
>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: Towards Whirr 0.6
Posted by Tom White <to...@cloudera.com>.
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Andrei Savu <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe we are getting close to the point were we can make a new
> release (the last one was on 03 / Jun / 11).
>
> Some of the issues we should focus to make this happen are:
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-334
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-240
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-339
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-189
>
> If we address those I believe it's enough for a new release. What do you think?
Thanks for bringing this up. Yes, I think these JIRAs would be
sufficient. The items below would be nice to have, but shouldn't block
a release IMO.
Cheers,
Tom
>
> As Tom suggested in a previous email we should also do some more work on:
>
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-189 (ready?)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-294
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-325 (I believe it needs
> jclouds 1.1.0)
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-276
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-255 (Adrian any feedback
> on this? BTW did you knew about Puppet CloudPack [1]? )
>
> What else should we add to this short list? I've missed something important?
>
> [1] http://docs.puppetlabs.com/guides/cloud_pack_getting_started.html
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Andrei Savu / andreisavu.ro
>