You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Vinayak Joshi (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/11/10 09:05:58 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-18256) Improve performance of event
log replay in HistoryServer based on profiler results
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15653501#comment-15653501 ]
Vinayak Joshi edited comment on SPARK-18256 at 11/10/16 9:05 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hi - this kind of compliments the log replay improvement in SPARK-18010. SPARK-18010 got marked as Fix Version 2.1. Curious, if this instead can't be 2.1 as well?
was (Author: vijoshi):
Hi - this kind of compliments the log replay improvement in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18256. SPARK-18256 got marked as Fix Version 2.1. Curious, if there's a reason that this instead has been marked as Fix Version: 2.2 and can not be 2.1 as well?
> Improve performance of event log replay in HistoryServer based on profiler results
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-18256
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18256
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Josh Rosen
> Assignee: Josh Rosen
> Fix For: 2.2.0
>
>
> Profiling event log replay in the HistoryServer reveals Json4S control flow exceptions and `Utils.getFormattedClassName` calls as significant bottlenecks. Eliminating these halves the time to replay long event logs.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org