Confusion over commons logging

["Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net>]

Someone posted to the Velocity list asking about logging, suggesting that he
was confused because he really liked log4j, Velocity uses logkit by default
(and of course can use log4j), and as the user put it "Then there is the
commons logger".

Does anyone mind if I put up a page on the commons website covering the
logging component to help prevent others from being confused?

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.                       geirm@optonline.net
System and Software Consulting
You're going to end up getting pissed at your software
anyway, so you might as well not pay for it. Try Open Source.



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: Confusion over commons logging

[ba...@generationjava.com]

It would seem essential. Especially as the Commons answer to the question
would seem to be:

Code to commons-logger, and then pick and choose between log4j and logkit
at will.

On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

>
> Someone posted to the Velocity list asking about logging, suggesting that he
> was confused because he really liked log4j, Velocity uses logkit by default
> (and of course can use log4j), and as the user put it "Then there is the
> commons logger".
>
> Does anyone mind if I put up a page on the commons website covering the
> logging component to help prevent others from being confused?
>
> --
> Geir Magnusson Jr.                       geirm@optonline.net
> System and Software Consulting
> You're going to end up getting pissed at your software
> anyway, so you might as well not pay for it. Try Open Source.
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>