You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@paimon.apache.org by "pixeeai (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2024/12/01 14:03:55 UTC

[PR] Introduced protections against deserialization attacks [paimon]

pixeeai opened a new pull request, #4613:
URL: https://github.com/apache/paimon/pull/4613

   Hi, my name is Zach and I'm a developer for Pixee. I wanted to bring some light to this change as it was generated from our automated code security bot.
   
   This change hardens Java deserialization operations against attack. Even a simple operation like an object deserialization is an opportunity to yield control of your system to an attacker. In fact, without specific, non-default protections, any object deserialization call can lead to arbitrary code execution. The JavaDoc [now even says](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/api/java.base/java/io/ObjectInputFilter.html):
   
   > Deserialization of untrusted data is inherently dangerous and should be avoided.
   
   Let's discuss the attack. In Java, types can customize how they should be deserialized by specifying a `readObject()` method like this real example from an [old version of Spring](https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-framework/blob/4.0.x/spring-core/src/main/java/org/springframework/core/SerializableTypeWrapper.java#L404):
   
   ```java
   static class MethodInvokeTypeProvider implements TypeProvider {
       private final TypeProvider provider;
       private final String methodName;
   
       private void readObject(ObjectInputStream inputStream) {
           inputStream.defaultReadObject();
           Method method = ReflectionUtils.findMethod(
                   this.provider.getType().getClass(),
                   this.methodName
           );
           this.result = ReflectionUtils.invokeMethod(method,this.provider.getType());
       }
   }
   ```
   
   Reflecting on this code reveals a terrifying conclusion. If an attacker presents this object to be deserialized by your app, the runtime will take a class and a method name from the attacker and then call them. Note that an attacker can provide any serliazed type -- it doesn't have to be the one you're expecting, and it will still deserialize.
   
   Attackers can repurpose the logic of selected types within the Java classpath (called "gadgets") and chain them together to achieve arbitrary remote code execution. There are a limited number of publicly known gadgets that can be used for attack, and our change simply inserts an [ObjectInputFilter](https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/17/docs/api/java.base/java/io/ObjectInputStream.html#setObjectInputFilter(java.io.ObjectInputFilter)) into the `ObjectInputStream` to prevent them from being used.
   
   ```diff
   + import io.github.pixee.security.ObjectInputFilters;
     ObjectInputStream ois = new ObjectInputStream(is);
   + ObjectInputFilters.enableObjectFilterIfUnprotected(ois);
     AcmeObject acme = (AcmeObject)ois.readObject();
   ```
   
   This is a tough vulnerability class to understand, but it is deadly serious. It offers the highest impact possible (remote code execution), it's a common vulnerability (it's in the OWASP Top 10), and exploitation is easy enough that automated exploitation is possible. It's best to remove deserialization entirely, but our protections is effective against all known exploitation strategies.
   
   <details>
     <summary>More reading</summary>
   
     * [https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Deserialization_Cheat_Sheet.html](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Deserialization_Cheat_Sheet.html)
     * [https://portswigger.net/web-security/deserialization/exploiting](https://portswigger.net/web-security/deserialization/exploiting)
   </details>
   
   I have additional improvements ready for this repo! If you want to see them, leave the comment: (after installing for your repo [here](https://github.com/marketplace/pixeebot-automated-code-fixes))
   ```
   @pixeebot next
   ```
   ... and I will open a new PR right away!
   
   
   🧚🤖  Powered by Pixeebot  
   
   [Feedback](https://ask.pixee.ai/feedback) | [Community](https://pixee-community.slack.com/signup#/domain-signup) | [Docs](https://docs.pixee.ai/) | Codemod ID: pixee:java/harden-java-deserialization ![](https://d1zaessa2hpsmj.cloudfront.net/pixel/v1/track?writeKey=2PI43jNm7atYvAuK7rJUz3Kcd6A&event=DRIP_PR%7CPixeebot-2-0%2Fpaimon%7C1f8d416ff5d748935359deba5537fa238dc86aa6)
   
   
   <!--{"type":"DRIP","codemod":"pixee:java/harden-java-deserialization"}-->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@paimon.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Introduced protections against deserialization attacks [paimon]

Posted by "JingsongLi (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
JingsongLi closed pull request #4613: Introduced protections against deserialization attacks
URL: https://github.com/apache/paimon/pull/4613


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@paimon.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Introduced protections against deserialization attacks [paimon]

Posted by "JingsongLi (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
JingsongLi commented on PR #4613:
URL: https://github.com/apache/paimon/pull/4613#issuecomment-2515977868

   Hi @pixeeai , thanks for the contribution, but I don't think we need to protect serialization because our libs are serializations that run in computing engines such as Flink and Spark, and they have their own security mechanisms.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@paimon.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


Re: [PR] Introduced protections against deserialization attacks [paimon]

Posted by "JingsongLi (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
JingsongLi commented on PR #4613:
URL: https://github.com/apache/paimon/pull/4613#issuecomment-2568651006

   Close this now, feel free to re-open if you have more thoughts.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@paimon.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org