You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jcp-open@apache.org by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org> on 2010/02/16 09:52:25 UTC

Re: OSGi CT access

Richard S. Hall wrote:
> So, how do we move forward on this MOU plan?
> 
Any news on this front? I thought that having submitted the NDA is more
than is needed to get the access.
So maybe we could deliver to people how have already signed the NDA
while the new form is not there yet?

Regards
Carsten
-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org

Re: OSGi CT access

Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 2/16/10 5:54 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16.02.2010 10:24, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>    
>> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>      
>>> Ok, sounds good to me.
>>>
>>> Those with an NDA submitted and wanting OSGi CT access, speak up and I
>>> will verify and provide access.
>>>        
>
> Excellent.
>
>
>    
>>>        
>> Cool, so here is the ref to my nda:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/Correspondence/JCP/tck-nda-list.txt
>>      
>
> My NDA is also listed there and I would like to get access to check the
> Apache Felix Compendium service implementations I am working on. Thanks.
>    

I see Carsten's listed in the referenced file, but not yours, Felix. I 
do see your NDA in the documents section, so I think it is ok to send 
you the CT.

I am not sure about the protocol for editing the above tck-nda-list.txt 
file, but if it is ok for me to edit it, then I can add you Felix and 
record you two as having received the OSGi CT. As for your NDA pdf, I am 
not sure where this is supposed to be filed.

-> richard
> Regards
> Felix
>    

Re: OSGi CT access

Posted by Felix Meschberger <fm...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

On 16.02.2010 10:24, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> Ok, sounds good to me.
>>
>> Those with an NDA submitted and wanting OSGi CT access, speak up and I
>> will verify and provide access.


Excellent.


>>
> Cool, so here is the ref to my nda:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/Correspondence/JCP/tck-nda-list.txt


My NDA is also listed there and I would like to get access to check the
Apache Felix Compendium service implementations I am working on. Thanks.

Regards
Felix

Re: OSGi CT access

Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Ok, sounds good to me.
> 
> Those with an NDA submitted and wanting OSGi CT access, speak up and I
> will verify and provide access.
> 
Cool, so here is the ref to my nda:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/foundation/Correspondence/JCP/tck-nda-list.txt

:)

Carsten
-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org

Re: OSGi CT access

Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
On 2/16/10 5:12 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
> that would certainly be fine.  The NDA was written not just with JCP materials in mind, but anything that might come along in the future.
>    

Ok, sounds good to me.

Those with an NDA submitted and wanting OSGi CT access, speak up and I 
will verify and provide access.

Thanks!

-> richard

> geir
>
> On Feb 16, 2010, at 3:52 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>    
>> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>      
>>> So, how do we move forward on this MOU plan?
>>>
>>>        
>> Any news on this front? I thought that having submitted the NDA is more
>> than is needed to get the access.
>> So maybe we could deliver to people how have already signed the NDA
>> while the new form is not there yet?
>>
>> Regards
>> Carsten
>> -- 
>> Carsten Ziegeler
>> cziegeler@apache.org
>>      
>    

Re: OSGi CT access

Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
that would certainly be fine.  The NDA was written not just with JCP materials in mind, but anything that might come along in the future.

geir

On Feb 16, 2010, at 3:52 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:

> Richard S. Hall wrote:
>> So, how do we move forward on this MOU plan?
>> 
> Any news on this front? I thought that having submitted the NDA is more
> than is needed to get the access.
> So maybe we could deliver to people how have already signed the NDA
> while the new form is not there yet?
> 
> Regards
> Carsten
> -- 
> Carsten Ziegeler
> cziegeler@apache.org