SOAP & JMS (was: Re: Service class access to servlet container)

[Paul Fink <pf...@wamnet.com>]

I think it would be good to take one of the open source JMS
versions and create a SOAP/JMS implementation.

Trouble is I haven't figured out what that means, ..., yet.

ZOAP is suppose to be something like this but I'm not sure
its real. see ZOAP at www.jbosss.org.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Wouter Cloetens" <wc...@raleigh.ibm.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2000 6:53 AM
Subject: Re: Service class access to servlet container


> On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 17:01:07 -0500, Paul Fink wrote:
>
> >I think that the solution that will evolve will be a combination
> >of SOAP & EJB. My own solution is SOAP + JMS + EJB,
> > (well actually XML-RPC ;>})
>
> What a coincidence. I'm almost done with a first reusable version of a JMS
(MQSeries)
> SOAP transport implementation. I've had an MQSeries-HTTP SOAP bridge for
ages, but
> a JMS to EJB SOAP front-end (rather than a servlet) is the next step. :-)
> Initially, I guess I'll only support stateless transactions. Applications
that need to maintain
> state via remote object references will just have to use IIOP.
>
> >and I have found other reference to folks doing the same.
>
> Looks like there are a lot of great minds out there thinking alike. ;-)
>
> bfn, Wouter
> --
> http://www.workspot.net/~zombie/soap/
> My opinions are irrelevant. They will be assimilated by my employer.
>

Re: SOAP & JMS (was: Re: Service class access to servlet container)

[Christopher Elkins <ce...@scardini.com>]

> I think it would be good to take one of the open source JMS
> versions and create a SOAP/JMS implementation.
>
> Trouble is I haven't figured out what that means, ..., yet.
>
> ZOAP is suppose to be something like this but I'm not sure
> its real. see ZOAP at www.jbosss.org.
>
There's also OpenJMS <www.openjms.org>, which has a more amicable (BSD-like)
license.

--
Christopher Elkins

Re: SOAP & JMS (was: Re: Service class access to servlet container)

[Christopher Elkins <ce...@scardini.com>]

> I think it would be good to take one of the open source JMS
> versions and create a SOAP/JMS implementation.
>
> Trouble is I haven't figured out what that means, ..., yet.
>
> ZOAP is suppose to be something like this but I'm not sure
> its real. see ZOAP at www.jbosss.org.
>
There's also OpenJMS <www.openjms.org>, which has a more amicable (BSD-like)
license.

--
Christopher Elkins