You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net> on 2002/06/08 12:16:48 UTC
Re: svn commit: rev 2122 - trunk/subversion/svnadmin trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs
cmpilato@tigris.org writes:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: 2002-06-08 04:25 GMT
> New Revision: 2122
>
> Modified:
> trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs/deltify.c
> trunk/subversion/svnadmin/main.c
> Log:
> Revert revision 2111, and make the Right Fix(es).
Hmmmm, I bet this correct undeltify patch wouldn't apply to the r2092
branch, would it? As an alternative to our "hack" patch?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn commit: rev 2122 - trunk/subversion/svnadmin trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs
Posted by cm...@collab.net.
Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net> writes:
> cmpilato@tigris.org writes:
>
> > Author: cmpilato
> > Date: 2002-06-08 04:25 GMT
> > New Revision: 2122
> >
> > Modified:
> > trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs/deltify.c
> > trunk/subversion/svnadmin/main.c
> > Log:
> > Revert revision 2111, and make the Right Fix(es).
>
> Hmmmm, I bet this correct undeltify patch wouldn't apply to the r2092
> branch, would it? As an alternative to our "hack" patch?
Nope, but the hack patch is fine. One is not likely to be any more
efficient than the other, but the change I just committed is much
more... Right.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org