You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Michael Dürig <mi...@gmail.com> on 2011/12/13 14:52:33 UTC

Re: svn commit: r1213680 - /jackrabbit/sandbox/microkernel/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/ConflictingMoveTest.java

On 13.12.11 13:30, dpfister@apache.org wrote:
> Author: dpfister
> Date: Tue Dec 13 13:30:13 2011
> New Revision: 1213680
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1213680&view=rev
> Log:
> Replace '\r' (Mac OS line terminator) with '\n' (Unix line terminator)
>

[...]

>       @Test
> -    public void collidingMove() {
> -        String head = mk.getHeadRevision();
> -
> -        head = mk.commit("/", "+\"x\" : {} \r+\"y\" : {}\n", head, "");
> -
> -        try {
> -            mk.commit("/", ">\"x\" : \"y\"", head, "");
> -            fail("expected to fail since /y already exists");
> -        } catch (MicroKernelException e) {
> -            // expected
> -        }
> -    }

Why remove this test?

Michael

Re: svn commit: r1213680 - /jackrabbit/sandbox/microkernel/src/test/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/mk/ConflictingMoveTest.java

Posted by Dominique Pfister <dp...@adobe.com>.
Hm, no idea how this happened. No intention, though, I reverted the test removal...

On Dec 13, 2011, at 2:52 PM, Michael Dürig wrote:

> 
> On 13.12.11 13:30, dpfister@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: dpfister
>> Date: Tue Dec 13 13:30:13 2011
>> New Revision: 1213680
>> 
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1213680&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Replace '\r' (Mac OS line terminator) with '\n' (Unix line terminator)
>> 
> 
> [...]
> 
>>      @Test
>> -    public void collidingMove() {
>> -        String head = mk.getHeadRevision();
>> -
>> -        head = mk.commit("/", "+\"x\" : {} \r+\"y\" : {}\n", head, "");
>> -
>> -        try {
>> -            mk.commit("/", ">\"x\" : \"y\"", head, "");
>> -            fail("expected to fail since /y already exists");
>> -        } catch (MicroKernelException e) {
>> -            // expected
>> -        }
>> -    }
> 
> Why remove this test?
> 
> Michael