You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@clerezza.apache.org by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> on 2012/02/01 14:51:41 UTC
[VOTE] - Relase Apache Clerezza 0.2-incubating (RC5)
Hello,
While the last release candidate found a lot of acceptance (3 binding +1 in
the ppmc) it had to be withdrawn because of missing or incorrect NOTICE and
license files. Also the source distribution contained the sources of
modules that are not part of the release profile. The new release candidate
fixes these issues, for that it provides a new module containing the
assembly descriptor that replicates the directory structure excluding
modules not in the release profile.
This is now the fifth vote to release Clerezza parent and all the modules
in the release profile.
A zip with the source distribution and one with the compiled tdb launcher
are available with their signatures at:
http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201202/
In svn the release version is tagged parent-0.2-incubating.
Cheers,
Reto
Re: [DISCUSS] - Relase Apache Clerezza 0.2-incubating (RC5)
Posted by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>.
Hi,
Just clarifying: this release candidate, RC5, has not yet received any votes
from anyone?
Marvin Humphrey
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While the last release candidate found a lot of acceptance (3 binding +1 in
> the ppmc) it had to be withdrawn because of missing or incorrect NOTICE and
> license files.Also the source distribution contained the sources of
> modules that are not part of the release profile. The new release candidate
> fixes these issues, for that it provides a new module containing the
> assembly descriptor that replicates the directory structure excluding
> modules not in the release profile.
>
> This is now the fifth vote to release Clerezza parent and all the modules
> in the release profile.
>
> A zip with the source distribution and one with the compiled tdb launcher
> are available with their signatures at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201202/
>
> In svn the release version is tagged parent-0.2-incubating.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] - Relase Apache Clerezza 0.2-incubating (RC5)
Posted by Daniel Spicar <da...@trialox.org>.
Technically this release candidate is almost identical to RC4. I did a
quick test and build on a clean VM. Everything looks fine.
+1
Daniel
Re: [WITHDRAW][VOTE] - Relase Apache Clerezza 0.2-incubating (RC5)
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>.
Ok, thanks.
So I withdraw this release candidate, address CLEREZZA-682 and will propose
RC6 asap.
Reto
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Tommaso Teofili
<to...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 2012/2/3 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>
>
> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:28 AM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > While the last release candidate found a lot of acceptance (3 binding
> > +1
> > > in
> > > > the ppmc) it had to be withdrawn because of missing or incorrect
> NOTICE
> > > and
> > > > license files. Also the source distribution contained the sources of
> > > modules
> > > > that are not part of the release profile. The new release candidate
> > fixes
> > > > these issues, for that it provides a new module containing the
> assembly
> > > > descriptor that replicates the directory structure excluding modules
> > not
> > > in
> > > > the release profile.
> > > >
> > > > This is now the fifth vote to release Clerezza parent and all the
> > > modules in
> > > > the release profile.
> > > >
> > > > A zip with the source distribution and one with the compiled tdb
> > launcher
> > > > are available with their signatures at:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201202/
> > > >
> > > > In svn the release version is tagged parent-0.2-incubating.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Reto
> > >
> > > I've had a look and the LICENSE file in the binary distribution looks
> > > good now. The binary distribution is missing the NOTICE file though.
> > >
> >
> > I see that the with the change to the generated NOTICE files the binary
> > assembly no longer contains the file. I've created CLEREZZA-682 to
> address
> > this, can we proceed with the release anyway or is this a blocker? (just
> > releasing the source version would be fine as well, imho)
>
>
> > >
> > > The source distribution has a README.txt which says ""This is a source
> > > distribution containing different modules to which different notices
> > > from copyright holders apply, see the NOTICE files in the root folders
> > > of the individual modules." That might be better to also mention
> > > licensing, perhaps "...different licenses and notices...see the
> > > LICENSE and NOTICE files...", i'd probably still vote for it with the
> > > text as it is though.
> > >
> > I have no problem changing this for the future, but I would like to
> remark
> > that the current information on copyrights and licenses seems more
> explicit
> > than the graduated apache project I looked at (sling and servicemix).
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Also remember still my comment from the previous thread - not everyone
> > > here will be happy with source license doc like this and not all in
> > > the top LICENSE file so pester people like your mentors to make sure
> > > you'll get the necessary votes.
> > >
> >
> > While our champion participated in the discussion, unfortunately I got no
> > feedback from our mentors (sent mail on private list and added them
> > individually as recipient to the last release thread). But weith Tommaso
> we
> > had already an IPMC member vote and I understood you and Bertrand that
> you
> > would support a release after the licensing/notice issues have been
> fixed.
> >
> > The main question seem to me if we can go on with the vote despite the
> > missing notice in the binary release candidate and if yes if we should
> > exclude the binary from this candidate (and decide only on releasing the
> > source distro).
> >
> >
> I think the best option would be to fix the NOTICE in binary, fire a new RC
> and release the binary stuff too because releasing only the source
> package, in my opinion, would be not that convenient in terms of using
> Apache Clerezza as devs couldn't take the binary neither from ASF mirrors
> nor from Maven Central.
> WDYT?
>
> Tommaso
>
>
>
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
> >
> >
> > >
> > > ...ant
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [WITHDRAW][VOTE] - Relase Apache Clerezza 0.2-incubating (RC5)
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>.
Ok, thanks.
So I withdraw this release candidate, address CLEREZZA-682 and will propose
RC6 asap.
Reto
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Tommaso Teofili
<to...@gmail.com>wrote:
> 2012/2/3 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>
>
> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:28 AM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > While the last release candidate found a lot of acceptance (3 binding
> > +1
> > > in
> > > > the ppmc) it had to be withdrawn because of missing or incorrect
> NOTICE
> > > and
> > > > license files. Also the source distribution contained the sources of
> > > modules
> > > > that are not part of the release profile. The new release candidate
> > fixes
> > > > these issues, for that it provides a new module containing the
> assembly
> > > > descriptor that replicates the directory structure excluding modules
> > not
> > > in
> > > > the release profile.
> > > >
> > > > This is now the fifth vote to release Clerezza parent and all the
> > > modules in
> > > > the release profile.
> > > >
> > > > A zip with the source distribution and one with the compiled tdb
> > launcher
> > > > are available with their signatures at:
> > > >
> > > > http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201202/
> > > >
> > > > In svn the release version is tagged parent-0.2-incubating.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Reto
> > >
> > > I've had a look and the LICENSE file in the binary distribution looks
> > > good now. The binary distribution is missing the NOTICE file though.
> > >
> >
> > I see that the with the change to the generated NOTICE files the binary
> > assembly no longer contains the file. I've created CLEREZZA-682 to
> address
> > this, can we proceed with the release anyway or is this a blocker? (just
> > releasing the source version would be fine as well, imho)
>
>
> > >
> > > The source distribution has a README.txt which says ""This is a source
> > > distribution containing different modules to which different notices
> > > from copyright holders apply, see the NOTICE files in the root folders
> > > of the individual modules." That might be better to also mention
> > > licensing, perhaps "...different licenses and notices...see the
> > > LICENSE and NOTICE files...", i'd probably still vote for it with the
> > > text as it is though.
> > >
> > I have no problem changing this for the future, but I would like to
> remark
> > that the current information on copyrights and licenses seems more
> explicit
> > than the graduated apache project I looked at (sling and servicemix).
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Also remember still my comment from the previous thread - not everyone
> > > here will be happy with source license doc like this and not all in
> > > the top LICENSE file so pester people like your mentors to make sure
> > > you'll get the necessary votes.
> > >
> >
> > While our champion participated in the discussion, unfortunately I got no
> > feedback from our mentors (sent mail on private list and added them
> > individually as recipient to the last release thread). But weith Tommaso
> we
> > had already an IPMC member vote and I understood you and Bertrand that
> you
> > would support a release after the licensing/notice issues have been
> fixed.
> >
> > The main question seem to me if we can go on with the vote despite the
> > missing notice in the binary release candidate and if yes if we should
> > exclude the binary from this candidate (and decide only on releasing the
> > source distro).
> >
> >
> I think the best option would be to fix the NOTICE in binary, fire a new RC
> and release the binary stuff too because releasing only the source
> package, in my opinion, would be not that convenient in terms of using
> Apache Clerezza as devs couldn't take the binary neither from ASF mirrors
> nor from Maven Central.
> WDYT?
>
> Tommaso
>
>
>
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
> >
> >
> > >
> > > ...ant
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] - Relase Apache Clerezza 0.2-incubating (RC5)
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
2012/2/3 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:28 AM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > While the last release candidate found a lot of acceptance (3 binding
> +1
> > in
> > > the ppmc) it had to be withdrawn because of missing or incorrect NOTICE
> > and
> > > license files. Also the source distribution contained the sources of
> > modules
> > > that are not part of the release profile. The new release candidate
> fixes
> > > these issues, for that it provides a new module containing the assembly
> > > descriptor that replicates the directory structure excluding modules
> not
> > in
> > > the release profile.
> > >
> > > This is now the fifth vote to release Clerezza parent and all the
> > modules in
> > > the release profile.
> > >
> > > A zip with the source distribution and one with the compiled tdb
> launcher
> > > are available with their signatures at:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201202/
> > >
> > > In svn the release version is tagged parent-0.2-incubating.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Reto
> >
> > I've had a look and the LICENSE file in the binary distribution looks
> > good now. The binary distribution is missing the NOTICE file though.
> >
>
> I see that the with the change to the generated NOTICE files the binary
> assembly no longer contains the file. I've created CLEREZZA-682 to address
> this, can we proceed with the release anyway or is this a blocker? (just
> releasing the source version would be fine as well, imho)
> >
> > The source distribution has a README.txt which says ""This is a source
> > distribution containing different modules to which different notices
> > from copyright holders apply, see the NOTICE files in the root folders
> > of the individual modules." That might be better to also mention
> > licensing, perhaps "...different licenses and notices...see the
> > LICENSE and NOTICE files...", i'd probably still vote for it with the
> > text as it is though.
> >
> I have no problem changing this for the future, but I would like to remark
> that the current information on copyrights and licenses seems more explicit
> than the graduated apache project I looked at (sling and servicemix).
>
>
> >
> > Also remember still my comment from the previous thread - not everyone
> > here will be happy with source license doc like this and not all in
> > the top LICENSE file so pester people like your mentors to make sure
> > you'll get the necessary votes.
> >
>
> While our champion participated in the discussion, unfortunately I got no
> feedback from our mentors (sent mail on private list and added them
> individually as recipient to the last release thread). But weith Tommaso we
> had already an IPMC member vote and I understood you and Bertrand that you
> would support a release after the licensing/notice issues have been fixed.
>
> The main question seem to me if we can go on with the vote despite the
> missing notice in the binary release candidate and if yes if we should
> exclude the binary from this candidate (and decide only on releasing the
> source distro).
>
>
I think the best option would be to fix the NOTICE in binary, fire a new RC
and release the binary stuff too because releasing only the source
package, in my opinion, would be not that convenient in terms of using
Apache Clerezza as devs couldn't take the binary neither from ASF mirrors
nor from Maven Central.
WDYT?
Tommaso
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
>
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] - Relase Apache Clerezza 0.2-incubating (RC5)
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
2012/2/3 Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:28 AM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > While the last release candidate found a lot of acceptance (3 binding
> +1
> > in
> > > the ppmc) it had to be withdrawn because of missing or incorrect NOTICE
> > and
> > > license files. Also the source distribution contained the sources of
> > modules
> > > that are not part of the release profile. The new release candidate
> fixes
> > > these issues, for that it provides a new module containing the assembly
> > > descriptor that replicates the directory structure excluding modules
> not
> > in
> > > the release profile.
> > >
> > > This is now the fifth vote to release Clerezza parent and all the
> > modules in
> > > the release profile.
> > >
> > > A zip with the source distribution and one with the compiled tdb
> launcher
> > > are available with their signatures at:
> > >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201202/
> > >
> > > In svn the release version is tagged parent-0.2-incubating.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Reto
> >
> > I've had a look and the LICENSE file in the binary distribution looks
> > good now. The binary distribution is missing the NOTICE file though.
> >
>
> I see that the with the change to the generated NOTICE files the binary
> assembly no longer contains the file. I've created CLEREZZA-682 to address
> this, can we proceed with the release anyway or is this a blocker? (just
> releasing the source version would be fine as well, imho)
> >
> > The source distribution has a README.txt which says ""This is a source
> > distribution containing different modules to which different notices
> > from copyright holders apply, see the NOTICE files in the root folders
> > of the individual modules." That might be better to also mention
> > licensing, perhaps "...different licenses and notices...see the
> > LICENSE and NOTICE files...", i'd probably still vote for it with the
> > text as it is though.
> >
> I have no problem changing this for the future, but I would like to remark
> that the current information on copyrights and licenses seems more explicit
> than the graduated apache project I looked at (sling and servicemix).
>
>
> >
> > Also remember still my comment from the previous thread - not everyone
> > here will be happy with source license doc like this and not all in
> > the top LICENSE file so pester people like your mentors to make sure
> > you'll get the necessary votes.
> >
>
> While our champion participated in the discussion, unfortunately I got no
> feedback from our mentors (sent mail on private list and added them
> individually as recipient to the last release thread). But weith Tommaso we
> had already an IPMC member vote and I understood you and Bertrand that you
> would support a release after the licensing/notice issues have been fixed.
>
> The main question seem to me if we can go on with the vote despite the
> missing notice in the binary release candidate and if yes if we should
> exclude the binary from this candidate (and decide only on releasing the
> source distro).
>
>
I think the best option would be to fix the NOTICE in binary, fire a new RC
and release the binary stuff too because releasing only the source
package, in my opinion, would be not that convenient in terms of using
Apache Clerezza as devs couldn't take the binary neither from ASF mirrors
nor from Maven Central.
WDYT?
Tommaso
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
>
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] - Relase Apache Clerezza 0.2-incubating (RC5)
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:28 AM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > While the last release candidate found a lot of acceptance (3 binding +1
> in
> > the ppmc) it had to be withdrawn because of missing or incorrect NOTICE
> and
> > license files. Also the source distribution contained the sources of
> modules
> > that are not part of the release profile. The new release candidate fixes
> > these issues, for that it provides a new module containing the assembly
> > descriptor that replicates the directory structure excluding modules not
> in
> > the release profile.
> >
> > This is now the fifth vote to release Clerezza parent and all the
> modules in
> > the release profile.
> >
> > A zip with the source distribution and one with the compiled tdb launcher
> > are available with their signatures at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201202/
> >
> > In svn the release version is tagged parent-0.2-incubating.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
>
> I've had a look and the LICENSE file in the binary distribution looks
> good now. The binary distribution is missing the NOTICE file though.
>
I see that the with the change to the generated NOTICE files the binary
assembly no longer contains the file. I've created CLEREZZA-682 to address
this, can we proceed with the release anyway or is this a blocker? (just
releasing the source version would be fine as well, imho)
>
> The source distribution has a README.txt which says ""This is a source
> distribution containing different modules to which different notices
> from copyright holders apply, see the NOTICE files in the root folders
> of the individual modules." That might be better to also mention
> licensing, perhaps "...different licenses and notices...see the
> LICENSE and NOTICE files...", i'd probably still vote for it with the
> text as it is though.
>
I have no problem changing this for the future, but I would like to remark
that the current information on copyrights and licenses seems more explicit
than the graduated apache project I looked at (sling and servicemix).
>
> Also remember still my comment from the previous thread - not everyone
> here will be happy with source license doc like this and not all in
> the top LICENSE file so pester people like your mentors to make sure
> you'll get the necessary votes.
>
While our champion participated in the discussion, unfortunately I got no
feedback from our mentors (sent mail on private list and added them
individually as recipient to the last release thread). But weith Tommaso we
had already an IPMC member vote and I understood you and Bertrand that you
would support a release after the licensing/notice issues have been fixed.
The main question seem to me if we can go on with the vote despite the
missing notice in the binary release candidate and if yes if we should
exclude the binary from this candidate (and decide only on releasing the
source distro).
Cheers,
Reto
>
> ...ant
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] - Relase Apache Clerezza 0.2-incubating (RC5)
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:28 AM, ant elder <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > While the last release candidate found a lot of acceptance (3 binding +1
> in
> > the ppmc) it had to be withdrawn because of missing or incorrect NOTICE
> and
> > license files. Also the source distribution contained the sources of
> modules
> > that are not part of the release profile. The new release candidate fixes
> > these issues, for that it provides a new module containing the assembly
> > descriptor that replicates the directory structure excluding modules not
> in
> > the release profile.
> >
> > This is now the fifth vote to release Clerezza parent and all the
> modules in
> > the release profile.
> >
> > A zip with the source distribution and one with the compiled tdb launcher
> > are available with their signatures at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201202/
> >
> > In svn the release version is tagged parent-0.2-incubating.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Reto
>
> I've had a look and the LICENSE file in the binary distribution looks
> good now. The binary distribution is missing the NOTICE file though.
>
I see that the with the change to the generated NOTICE files the binary
assembly no longer contains the file. I've created CLEREZZA-682 to address
this, can we proceed with the release anyway or is this a blocker? (just
releasing the source version would be fine as well, imho)
>
> The source distribution has a README.txt which says ""This is a source
> distribution containing different modules to which different notices
> from copyright holders apply, see the NOTICE files in the root folders
> of the individual modules." That might be better to also mention
> licensing, perhaps "...different licenses and notices...see the
> LICENSE and NOTICE files...", i'd probably still vote for it with the
> text as it is though.
>
I have no problem changing this for the future, but I would like to remark
that the current information on copyrights and licenses seems more explicit
than the graduated apache project I looked at (sling and servicemix).
>
> Also remember still my comment from the previous thread - not everyone
> here will be happy with source license doc like this and not all in
> the top LICENSE file so pester people like your mentors to make sure
> you'll get the necessary votes.
>
While our champion participated in the discussion, unfortunately I got no
feedback from our mentors (sent mail on private list and added them
individually as recipient to the last release thread). But weith Tommaso we
had already an IPMC member vote and I understood you and Bertrand that you
would support a release after the licensing/notice issues have been fixed.
The main question seem to me if we can go on with the vote despite the
missing notice in the binary release candidate and if yes if we should
exclude the binary from this candidate (and decide only on releasing the
source distro).
Cheers,
Reto
>
> ...ant
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] - Relase Apache Clerezza 0.2-incubating (RC5)
Posted by ant elder <an...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <re...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While the last release candidate found a lot of acceptance (3 binding +1 in
> the ppmc) it had to be withdrawn because of missing or incorrect NOTICE and
> license files. Also the source distribution contained the sources of modules
> that are not part of the release profile. The new release candidate fixes
> these issues, for that it provides a new module containing the assembly
> descriptor that replicates the directory structure excluding modules not in
> the release profile.
>
> This is now the fifth vote to release Clerezza parent and all the modules in
> the release profile.
>
> A zip with the source distribution and one with the compiled tdb launcher
> are available with their signatures at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~reto/clerezza-release-201202/
>
> In svn the release version is tagged parent-0.2-incubating.
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
I've had a look and the LICENSE file in the binary distribution looks
good now. The binary distribution is missing the NOTICE file though.
The source distribution has a README.txt which says ""This is a source
distribution containing different modules to which different notices
from copyright holders apply, see the NOTICE files in the root folders
of the individual modules." That might be better to also mention
licensing, perhaps "...different licenses and notices...see the
LICENSE and NOTICE files...", i'd probably still vote for it with the
text as it is though.
Also remember still my comment from the previous thread - not everyone
here will be happy with source license doc like this and not all in
the top LICENSE file so pester people like your mentors to make sure
you'll get the necessary votes.
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org