You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bahir.apache.org by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2016/12/03 18:08:13 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1)
Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
Bahir version 2.0.2 based on Apache Spark 2.0.2.
The difference between 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 RC1 can be visualized at
https://github.com/apache/bahir/compare/v2.0.1-rc1...v2.0.2-rc1
The tag to be voted on is v2.0.2-rc1
(1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90)
https://github.com/apache/bahi
r/tree/1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90
The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebahir-1007
The source distribution is also available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/2.0.2-rc1/
The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bahir 2.0.1
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
--
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/
Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1)
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good.
Looking forward to the next RC.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Christian R Kadner <ck...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> we decided to ignore the test that failed sporadically when we tested the
> RC in December (BAHIR-83).
>
> So we should be good to give it a second attempt.
>
> Best regards,
> Christian Kadner
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Ted Yu ---01/10/2017 08:58:06 AM---Is it
> a proper time to start preparing the next RC ? Cheers]Ted Yu
> ---01/10/2017 08:58:06 AM---Is it a proper time to start preparing the next
> RC ? Cheers
>
> From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@bahir.apache.org
> Date: 01/10/2017 08:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1)
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Is it a proper time to start preparing the next RC ?
>
> Cheers
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
> > Bahir version 2.0.2 based on Apache Spark 2.0.2.
> >
> > The difference between 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 RC1 can be visualized at
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/bahir/compare/v2.0.1-rc1...v2.0.2-rc1
>
> >
> > The tag to be voted on is v2.0.2-rc1
> > (1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90)
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/bahi
> > r/tree/1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90
> >
> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebahir-1007
> >
> > The source distribution is also available at:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/2.0.2-rc1/
> >
> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bahir 2.0.1
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1)
Posted by Christian R Kadner <ck...@us.ibm.com>.
Hi Ted,
we decided to ignore the test that failed sporadically when we tested the
RC in December (BAHIR-83).
So we should be good to give it a second attempt.
Best regards,
Christian Kadner
From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@bahir.apache.org
Date: 01/10/2017 08:58 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1)
Is it a proper time to start preparing the next RC ?
Cheers
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
> Bahir version 2.0.2 based on Apache Spark 2.0.2.
>
> The difference between 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 RC1 can be visualized at
>
> https://github.com/apache/bahir/compare/v2.0.1-rc1...v2.0.2-rc1
>
> The tag to be voted on is v2.0.2-rc1
> (1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90)
>
> https://github.com/apache/bahi
> r/tree/1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90
>
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebahir-1007
>
> The source distribution is also available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/2.0.2-rc1/
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least
> 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bahir 2.0.1
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1)
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Is it a proper time to start preparing the next RC ?
Cheers
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
> Bahir version 2.0.2 based on Apache Spark 2.0.2.
>
> The difference between 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 RC1 can be visualized at
>
> https://github.com/apache/bahir/compare/v2.0.1-rc1...v2.0.2-rc1
>
> The tag to be voted on is v2.0.2-rc1
> (1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90)
>
> https://github.com/apache/bahi
> r/tree/1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90
>
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebahir-1007
>
> The source distribution is also available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/2.0.2-rc1/
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bahir 2.0.1
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1)
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
I ran MQTTStreamSourceSuite alone which passed:
mvn scalatest:test -pl sql-streaming-mqtt -q
-Dsuites='*.MQTTStreamSourceSuite'
On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 12:55 AM, Christian R Kadner <ck...@us.ibm.com>
wrote:
> I did repeated runs of that particular test and it failed 6 of 100 runs.
>
> ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> ───────────────
> for i in `seq 100` ; do
> mvn scalatest:test -pl sql-streaming-mqtt -q \
> -Dsuites='*.BasicMQTTSourceSuite @ Recovering offset from the last
> processed offset.' | \
> grep -q "TEST FAILED" && echo "$i: failed"
> done
> ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> ───────────────
> 1: failed
> 6: failed
> 22: failed
> 46: failed
> 77: failed
> 83: failed
> ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> ───────────────
>
> The complete test suite BasicMQTTSourceSuite failed 56/100 times.
>
> Similar behavior with Spark 2.0.1. so it should not be a regression.
>
> I opened a JIRA to track/fix this:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BAHIR-83
>
> Best regards,
> Christian Kadner
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Ted Yu ---12/03/2016 01:41:26 PM---I got
> two test failures: http://pastebin.com/P2J2jQzC]Ted Yu ---12/03/2016
> 01:41:26 PM---I got two test failures: http://pastebin.com/P2J2jQzC
>
> From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@bahir.apache.org
> Date: 12/03/2016 01:41 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1)
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> I got two test failures:
>
> http://pastebin.com/P2J2jQzC
>
> I use maven 3.3.9 and Java 8.
>
> Does anyone else see the above ?
>
> Cheers
>
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
> > Bahir version 2.0.2 based on Apache Spark 2.0.2.
> >
> > The difference between 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 RC1 can be visualized at
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/bahir/compare/v2.0.1-rc1...v2.0.2-rc1
> >
> > The tag to be voted on is v2.0.2-rc1
> > (1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90)
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/bahi
> > r/tree/1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90
> >
> > The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebahir-1007
> >
> > The source distribution is also available at:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/2.0.2-rc1/
> >
> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least
> > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bahir 2.0.1
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1)
Posted by Christian R Kadner <ck...@us.ibm.com>.
I did repeated runs of that particular test and it failed 6 of 100 runs.
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
for i in `seq 100` ; do
mvn scalatest:test -pl sql-streaming-mqtt -q \
-Dsuites='*.BasicMQTTSourceSuite @ Recovering offset from the last
processed offset.' | \
grep -q "TEST FAILED" && echo "$i: failed"
done
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
1: failed
6: failed
22: failed
46: failed
77: failed
83: failed
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
The complete test suite BasicMQTTSourceSuite failed 56/100 times.
Similar behavior with Spark 2.0.1. so it should not be a regression.
I opened a JIRA to track/fix this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BAHIR-83
Best regards,
Christian Kadner
From: Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>
To: dev@bahir.apache.org
Date: 12/03/2016 01:41 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1)
I got two test failures:
http://pastebin.com/P2J2jQzC
I use maven 3.3.9 and Java 8.
Does anyone else see the above ?
Cheers
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
> Bahir version 2.0.2 based on Apache Spark 2.0.2.
>
> The difference between 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 RC1 can be visualized at
>
> https://github.com/apache/bahir/compare/v2.0.1-rc1...v2.0.2-rc1
>
> The tag to be voted on is v2.0.2-rc1
> (1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90)
>
> https://github.com/apache/bahi
> r/tree/1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90
>
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebahir-1007
>
> The source distribution is also available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/2.0.2-rc1/
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least
> 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bahir 2.0.1
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Bahir 2.0.2 (RC1)
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
I got two test failures:
http://pastebin.com/P2J2jQzC
I use maven 3.3.9 and Java 8.
Does anyone else see the above ?
Cheers
On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as Apache
> Bahir version 2.0.2 based on Apache Spark 2.0.2.
>
> The difference between 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 RC1 can be visualized at
>
> https://github.com/apache/bahir/compare/v2.0.1-rc1...v2.0.2-rc1
>
> The tag to be voted on is v2.0.2-rc1
> (1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90)
>
> https://github.com/apache/bahi
> r/tree/1c411ea22e60e3f7b3e93fdbc6e2351cda816c90
>
> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebahir-1007
>
> The source distribution is also available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/bahir/2.0.2-rc1/
>
> The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at least
> 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Bahir 2.0.1
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>