idea for new module...

[Brian Behlendorf <br...@organic.com>]

What do you say?

	Brian

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  brian@hyperreal.com  http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 14:09:35 -0800
From: Rocky Mullin <ca...@organic.com>
To: Matthew Nelson <ma...@organic.com>, noise@organic.com
Subject: Re: surprise! (fwd)


	from now on
	have the server dump, at random, the name of one of
	these models to our pages.

<!-- Anna Nicole Smith Anna Nicole Smith Anna Nicole Smith Anna Nicole Smith
Anna Nicole Smith Anna Nicole Smith Anna Nicole Smith Anna Nicole Smith Anna
Nicole Smith Anna Nicole Smith Anna Nicole Smith Anna Nicole Smith -->

<!-- Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad
Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad
Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad
Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt Brad
Pitt Brad Pitt Brad Pitt -->

	hits will skyrocket

On Jan 23,  8:53pm, Matthew Nelson wrote:
> Subject: surprise! (fwd)
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 23 Jan 1996 18:48:13 -0500 (EST)
> From: shawn elson <el...@cc.gatech.edu>
> To: matthew@organic.com
> Subject: surprise! (fwd)
>
> what are we building here?
>
> -s
>
> --------------
>
> Tuesday January 23 2:25 PM EST
>
> Surprise! Actresses, Models Are Most Popular Internet
> Searches
>
> SANTA CLARA, Calif. - The more things change, the more they stay the
> same.
>
> The Internet, the revolutionary mass-communications media and world
> database which began as a
> way for eggheads around the world to share their latest findings in
> theoretical physics, has come of
> age.
>
> Well, underage, perhaps.
>
> In what should be a surprise to no one, Infoseek, a major Internet search
> engine, has announced that the most popular subjects it gets online
> requests for are for actresses and supermodels -- specifically Pamela
> Anderson, Anna Nicole Smith, and Cindy Crawford.
>
> Infoseek and other search engines can comb the millions of Web sites as
> well as postings in
> Usenet news groups for information, photographs and video on about just
> about anything.
>
> Infoseek's top 10 list is a ranking based on the number of recent
> searches made by users of
> Infoseek Guide (http://guide.infoseek.com) for each celebrity.
>
> There was one man on the list, and it wasn't Stephen Hawking. Hollywood
> hunk Brad Pitt ranked
> number five -- right behind Playboy centerfold Jenny McCarthy.
>
> The Infoseek top 10- list:
>
> 1. Pamela Anderson
>
> 2. Cindy Crawford
>
> 3. Anna Nicole Smith
>
> 4. Jenny McCarthy
>
> 5. Brad Pitt
>
> 6. Madonna
>
> 7. Demi Moore
>
> 8. Sharon Stone
>
> 9. Patricia Ford
>
> 10. Teri Hatcher
>
> Copyright, Reuters Ltd. All rights reserved
>
>-- End of excerpt from Matthew Nelson



-- 
\  c   /\  a   /\  l   /\  i   /\  b   /\  a   /\  n   /\     rocky mullin
_\____/__\____/__\____/__\____/__\____/__\____/__\____/__\  organic online
  \  /    \  /    \  /    \  /    \  /    \  /    \  /    \  san francisco
   \/      \/      \/      \/      \/ http://www.organic.com/Staff/caliban
ninja250 -- analog synthesis -- chaotic good -- the internet is my ashtray

Re: idea for new module...

[Matthew Gray <mk...@netgen.com>]

> What do you say?

I run a search engine that gets a similar profile of hits.
The 'best' strings to include based on what people search for are:

Sex related:		sex, adult, nude, playboy, porn, porno, erotica, 
			pornography, erotic, gay, penthouse, pussy, bondage, 
			girls, xxx, nudity, nudes, hustler
Non-sex related:	yahoo, chat, music, games, pictures, netscape, weather

41 out of the top 100 searches are sex related. 7 out of the top 10.  And 
the string 'sex' itself is searched for more often than any other by a 
factor of more than 3.  Boy, and people wonder what's driving the growth 
of the Internet.

So, in order to determine which pages to include these random insertions 
in, I guess we'll have to implement XXXBITHACK? :-)

						...Mk