You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@openmeetings.apache.org by Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com> on 2013/01/25 04:37:01 UTC
project status
I've messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don't think it's quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I'm dying to kick webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven't been able to locate any type of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
Thanks for the information.
________________________________
DISCLAIMER:
This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and delete the original message.
Re: project status
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
I thought roadmap should be more detailed and have dates (deadlines).
Currently it is more like general plans
On Jan 25, 2013 11:07 AM, "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?
>
> There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
> http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
>
> @Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think
> there is a need for making that more detailed?
>
>
>
> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>
>
>> I’ve messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don’t
>> think it’s quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I’m dying to
>> kick webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven’t been able to locate any
>> type of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out
>> of incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
>>
>> Thanks for the information.
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> DISCLAIMER:
>>
>> This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for
>> the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are
>> not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any
>> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information
>> contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received
>> this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and
>> delete the original message.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
Re: project status
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
We still working on SIP
right now we are working on SIP audio and video
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:24 PM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Jeff: Thanks for the feedback, I think some of the issues have been
> resolved. Simply dragging the video out of the browser is not possible.
> There has been some feature request in order to open a video in a new
> browser window, that would be almost the same. But it is not implemented
> yet.
>
> @Maxim: I think dates are difficult for the HTML5 part. You can only give
> rough estimations. But for the 2.1 version we could give some more proper
> estimations that is true.
> Have you finished the rework of the SIP integration? Have you done some
> test call to check the audio quality/delay?
>
> Thanks!
> Sebastian
>
>
> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>
>
>> Sebastian,****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> It’s been a few months since I’ve tried it, but I never could get the web
>> audio to mix with the asterisk/sip audio. I could dial in to the
>> conferences fine and other conference users could hear each other if they
>> were dialed in. After researching more, I found that I needed redphone or
>> some app of similar title to mix the audio, but I never could get it run.
>> The required (redphone) project seemed almost dead/abandoned. I filed
>> bug/trouble reports with OM and the responsible devs of the app and never
>> got a response. While not necessarily bugs, but enhancements/feature
>> requests to make it more competitive with webex and at&t connect is to have
>> the dial-in meetme bridge numbers random generate (and do a check,
>> obviously, to make sure the random number hadn’t been randomly generated
>> and in user before) instead of going in a sequential order within the range
>> specified in the settings. Oh, and an actual bug that comes to mind is that
>> when you delete a conference room or it naturally expires, the meetme
>> bridge is not removed the database; which allows users to call in and use
>> the audio bridge with expired credentials. Also, even when you’re not a
>> presenter, but just a regular meeting attendee without any special privs,
>> you can click on the presented document or whiteboard and your clicks show
>> up (including the pulsating circles) to all users. With this being written
>> in java, is there a way to get the video containers (the small windows
>> containing the webcams of other users) to be able to drag outside of the
>> main/hosting browser window? If you have multiple monitors and wish to drag
>> the webcam windows to another screen, you’re limited to only dragging them
>> within the browser window. I know I’m throwing a lot at you, this was
>> tested hastily, but extensively, between myself and some other admins. We
>> really liked the potential this showed, especially against the user
>> limitations of bigbluebutton, but as admins, we can’t devote a lot of time
>> to developing/changing/patching the problems or features we found or need.
>> ****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> If there is a potential to resolve some of the items addressed above, I
>> will gladly setup a new test box using current code and actively work with
>> whomever necessary.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Thanks for your time.****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> *From:* seba.wagner@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:47 PM
>>
>> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: project status****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> Hi Jeff,****
>>
>>
>> For production you should be using version 2.0.****
>>
>> 2.1 is not released ... but to tryout SIP integration I would use 2.1 too
>> and discuss issues here.****
>>
>> SIP integration has been reworked heavily lately.****
>>
>> Maybe you can tell us more about your problems with the SIP integration.
>> What exact revision of OpenMeetings 2.1 you have been using?****
>>
>> Have you been able to make make calls into the conference room from
>> SIP/landlane and out?****
>>
>>
>> Sebastian****
>>
>> ** **
>>
>> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>****
>>
>> Oh, and I was using version 2.1****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> *From:* Jeff Clay
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:13 PM
>> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
>> *Subject:* RE: project status****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I
>> experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff
>> clay or jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been
>> responded to or resolved.****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> *From:* seba.wagner@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com<se...@gmail.com>]
>>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
>> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
>> *Subject:* Re: project status****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> Hi Jeff,****
>>
>> which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?****
>>
>>
>> There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
>> http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx****
>>
>> @Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think
>> there is a need for making that more detailed?****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> ****
>>
>> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>****
>>
>> I’ve messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don’t think
>> it’s quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I’m dying to kick
>> webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven’t been able to locate any type
>> of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of
>> incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?****
>>
>> Thanks for the information.****
>>
>> ****
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> DISCLAIMER:
>>
>> This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for
>> the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are
>> not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any
>> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information
>> contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received
>> this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and
>> delete the original message.****
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> seba.wagner@gmail.com ****
>>
>> ****
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> To preserve the environment, please don't print this e-mail unless you
>> really need to.****
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> http://www.webbase-design.de
>> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
>> seba.wagner@gmail.com ****
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
RE: project status
Posted by Irina Arkhipets <ia...@unipro.ru>.
Hi Sebastian,
We are going to make a final SIP integration testing on the next Tuesday
(January, 29) - I'll inform you about the results.
Best regards,
Irina.
From: seba.wagner@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 2:25 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Maxim Solodovnik
Subject: Re: project status
@Jeff: Thanks for the feedback, I think some of the issues have been
resolved. Simply dragging the video out of the browser is not possible.
There has been some feature request in order to open a video in a new
browser window, that would be almost the same. But it is not implemented
yet.
@Maxim: I think dates are difficult for the HTML5 part. You can only give
rough estimations. But for the 2.1 version we could give some more proper
estimations that is true.
Have you finished the rework of the SIP integration? Have you done some test
call to check the audio quality/delay?
Thanks!
Sebastian
2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>
Sebastian,
It's been a few months since I've tried it, but I never could get the web
audio to mix with the asterisk/sip audio. I could dial in to the conferences
fine and other conference users could hear each other if they were dialed
in. After researching more, I found that I needed redphone or some app of
similar title to mix the audio, but I never could get it run. The required
(redphone) project seemed almost dead/abandoned. I filed bug/trouble reports
with OM and the responsible devs of the app and never got a response. While
not necessarily bugs, but enhancements/feature requests to make it more
competitive with webex and at&t connect is to have the dial-in meetme bridge
numbers random generate (and do a check, obviously, to make sure the random
number hadn't been randomly generated and in user before) instead of going
in a sequential order within the range specified in the settings. Oh, and an
actual bug that comes to mind is that when you delete a conference room or
it naturally expires, the meetme bridge is not removed the database; which
allows users to call in and use the audio bridge with expired credentials.
Also, even when you're not a presenter, but just a regular meeting attendee
without any special privs, you can click on the presented document or
whiteboard and your clicks show up (including the pulsating circles) to all
users. With this being written in java, is there a way to get the video
containers (the small windows containing the webcams of other users) to be
able to drag outside of the main/hosting browser window? If you have
multiple monitors and wish to drag the webcam windows to another screen,
you're limited to only dragging them within the browser window. I know I'm
throwing a lot at you, this was tested hastily, but extensively, between
myself and some other admins. We really liked the potential this showed,
especially against the user limitations of bigbluebutton, but as admins, we
can't devote a lot of time to developing/changing/patching the problems or
features we found or need.
If there is a potential to resolve some of the items addressed above, I will
gladly setup a new test box using current code and actively work with
whomever necessary.
Thanks for your time.
From: seba.wagner@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:47 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: project status
Hi Jeff,
For production you should be using version 2.0.
2.1 is not released ... but to tryout SIP integration I would use 2.1 too
and discuss issues here.
SIP integration has been reworked heavily lately.
Maybe you can tell us more about your problems with the SIP integration.
What exact revision of OpenMeetings 2.1 you have been using?
Have you been able to make make calls into the conference room from
SIP/landlane and out?
Sebastian
2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>
Oh, and I was using version 2.1
From: Jeff Clay
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:13 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: project status
I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I
experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff clay
or jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been responded to
or resolved.
From: seba.wagner@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: project status
Hi Jeff,
which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?
There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
@Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think
there is a need for making that more detailed?
2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>
I've messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don't think
it's quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I'm dying to kick
webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven't been able to locate any type
of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of
incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
Thanks for the information.
_____
DISCLAIMER:
This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for the
use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not
the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any
unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information
contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received
this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and
delete the original message.
--
Sebastian Wagner
<https://twitter.com/#%21/dead_lock> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
<http://www.webbase-design.de> http://www.webbase-design.de
<http://www.wagner-sebastian.com> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
<ma...@gmail.com> seba.wagner@gmail.com
_____
To preserve the environment, please don't print this e-mail unless you
really need to.
--
Sebastian Wagner
<https://twitter.com/#%21/dead_lock> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
<http://www.webbase-design.de> http://www.webbase-design.de
<http://www.wagner-sebastian.com> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
<ma...@gmail.com> seba.wagner@gmail.com
--
Sebastian Wagner
<https://twitter.com/#%21/dead_lock> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
<http://www.webbase-design.de> http://www.webbase-design.de
<http://www.wagner-sebastian.com> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
<ma...@gmail.com> seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: project status
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
@Jeff: Thanks for the feedback, I think some of the issues have been
resolved. Simply dragging the video out of the browser is not possible.
There has been some feature request in order to open a video in a new
browser window, that would be almost the same. But it is not implemented
yet.
@Maxim: I think dates are difficult for the HTML5 part. You can only give
rough estimations. But for the 2.1 version we could give some more proper
estimations that is true.
Have you finished the rework of the SIP integration? Have you done some
test call to check the audio quality/delay?
Thanks!
Sebastian
2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>
> Sebastian,****
>
> ** **
>
> It’s been a few months since I’ve tried it, but I never could get the web
> audio to mix with the asterisk/sip audio. I could dial in to the
> conferences fine and other conference users could hear each other if they
> were dialed in. After researching more, I found that I needed redphone or
> some app of similar title to mix the audio, but I never could get it run.
> The required (redphone) project seemed almost dead/abandoned. I filed
> bug/trouble reports with OM and the responsible devs of the app and never
> got a response. While not necessarily bugs, but enhancements/feature
> requests to make it more competitive with webex and at&t connect is to have
> the dial-in meetme bridge numbers random generate (and do a check,
> obviously, to make sure the random number hadn’t been randomly generated
> and in user before) instead of going in a sequential order within the range
> specified in the settings. Oh, and an actual bug that comes to mind is that
> when you delete a conference room or it naturally expires, the meetme
> bridge is not removed the database; which allows users to call in and use
> the audio bridge with expired credentials. Also, even when you’re not a
> presenter, but just a regular meeting attendee without any special privs,
> you can click on the presented document or whiteboard and your clicks show
> up (including the pulsating circles) to all users. With this being written
> in java, is there a way to get the video containers (the small windows
> containing the webcams of other users) to be able to drag outside of the
> main/hosting browser window? If you have multiple monitors and wish to drag
> the webcam windows to another screen, you’re limited to only dragging them
> within the browser window. I know I’m throwing a lot at you, this was
> tested hastily, but extensively, between myself and some other admins. We
> really liked the potential this showed, especially against the user
> limitations of bigbluebutton, but as admins, we can’t devote a lot of time
> to developing/changing/patching the problems or features we found or need.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> If there is a potential to resolve some of the items addressed above, I
> will gladly setup a new test box using current code and actively work with
> whomever necessary.****
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for your time.****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* seba.wagner@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:47 PM
>
> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: project status****
>
> ** **
>
> Hi Jeff,****
>
>
> For production you should be using version 2.0.****
>
> 2.1 is not released ... but to tryout SIP integration I would use 2.1 too
> and discuss issues here.****
>
> SIP integration has been reworked heavily lately.****
>
> Maybe you can tell us more about your problems with the SIP integration.
> What exact revision of OpenMeetings 2.1 you have been using?****
>
> Have you been able to make make calls into the conference room from
> SIP/landlane and out?****
>
>
> Sebastian****
>
> ** **
>
> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>****
>
> Oh, and I was using version 2.1****
>
> ****
>
> *From:* Jeff Clay
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:13 PM
> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* RE: project status****
>
> ****
>
> I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I
> experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff
> clay or jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been
> responded to or resolved.****
>
> ****
>
> *From:* seba.wagner@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com<se...@gmail.com>]
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: project status****
>
> ****
>
> Hi Jeff,****
>
> which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?****
>
>
> There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
> http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx****
>
> @Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think
> there is a need for making that more detailed?****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>****
>
> I’ve messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don’t think
> it’s quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I’m dying to kick
> webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven’t been able to locate any type
> of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of
> incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?****
>
> Thanks for the information.****
>
> ****
> ------------------------------
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for
> the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are
> not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information
> contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received
> this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and
> delete the original message.****
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com ****
>
> ****
> ------------------------------
>
>
> To preserve the environment, please don't print this e-mail unless you
> really need to.****
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com ****
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
RE: project status
Posted by Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>.
Sebastian,
It's been a few months since I've tried it, but I never could get the web audio to mix with the asterisk/sip audio. I could dial in to the conferences fine and other conference users could hear each other if they were dialed in. After researching more, I found that I needed redphone or some app of similar title to mix the audio, but I never could get it run. The required (redphone) project seemed almost dead/abandoned. I filed bug/trouble reports with OM and the responsible devs of the app and never got a response. While not necessarily bugs, but enhancements/feature requests to make it more competitive with webex and at&t connect is to have the dial-in meetme bridge numbers random generate (and do a check, obviously, to make sure the random number hadn't been randomly generated and in user before) instead of going in a sequential order within the range specified in the settings. Oh, and an actual bug that comes to mind is that when you delete a conference room or it naturally expires, the meetme bridge is not removed the database; which allows users to call in and use the audio bridge with expired credentials. Also, even when you're not a presenter, but just a regular meeting attendee without any special privs, you can click on the presented document or whiteboard and your clicks show up (including the pulsating circles) to all users. With this being written in java, is there a way to get the video containers (the small windows containing the webcams of other users) to be able to drag outside of the main/hosting browser window? If you have multiple monitors and wish to drag the webcam windows to another screen, you're limited to only dragging them within the browser window. I know I'm throwing a lot at you, this was tested hastily, but extensively, between myself and some other admins. We really liked the potential this showed, especially against the user limitations of bigbluebutton, but as admins, we can't devote a lot of time to developing/changing/patching the problems or features we found or need.
If there is a potential to resolve some of the items addressed above, I will gladly setup a new test box using current code and actively work with whomever necessary.
Thanks for your time.
From: seba.wagner@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:47 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: project status
Hi Jeff,
For production you should be using version 2.0.
2.1 is not released ... but to tryout SIP integration I would use 2.1 too and discuss issues here.
SIP integration has been reworked heavily lately.
Maybe you can tell us more about your problems with the SIP integration.
What exact revision of OpenMeetings 2.1 you have been using?
Have you been able to make make calls into the conference room from SIP/landlane and out?
Sebastian
2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>>
Oh, and I was using version 2.1
From: Jeff Clay
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:13 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org<ma...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: project status
I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff clay or jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been responded to or resolved.
From: seba.wagner@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com> [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org<ma...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: project status
Hi Jeff,
which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?
There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
@Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think there is a need for making that more detailed?
2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>>
I've messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don't think it's quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I'm dying to kick webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven't been able to locate any type of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
Thanks for the information.
________________________________
DISCLAIMER:
This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and delete the original message.
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock<https://twitter.com/#%21/dead_lock>
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>
________________________________
To preserve the environment, please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock<https://twitter.com/#%21/dead_lock>
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>
Re: project status
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jeff,
For production you should be using version 2.0.
2.1 is not released ... but to tryout SIP integration I would use 2.1 too
and discuss issues here.
SIP integration has been reworked heavily lately.
Maybe you can tell us more about your problems with the SIP integration.
What exact revision of OpenMeetings 2.1 you have been using?
Have you been able to make make calls into the conference room from
SIP/landlane and out?
Sebastian
2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>
> Oh, and I was using version 2.1****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Jeff Clay
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:13 PM
> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* RE: project status****
>
> ** **
>
> I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I
> experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff
> clay or jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been
> responded to or resolved.****
>
> ****
>
> *From:* seba.wagner@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com<se...@gmail.com>]
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
> *To:* openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: project status****
>
> ****
>
> Hi Jeff,****
>
> which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?****
>
>
> There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
> http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx****
>
> @Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think
> there is a need for making that more detailed?****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> 2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>****
>
> I’ve messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don’t think
> it’s quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I’m dying to kick
> webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven’t been able to locate any type
> of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of
> incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?****
>
> Thanks for the information.****
>
> ****
> ------------------------------
>
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for
> the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are
> not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information
> contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received
> this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and
> delete the original message.****
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com ****
>
> ** **
> ------------------------------
>
>
> To preserve the environment, please don't print this e-mail unless you
> really need to.****
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
RE: project status
Posted by Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>.
Oh, and I was using version 2.1
From: Jeff Clay
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:13 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: project status
I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff clay or jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been responded to or resolved.
From: seba.wagner@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com> [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org<ma...@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: project status
Hi Jeff,
which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?
There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
@Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think there is a need for making that more detailed?
2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>>
I've messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don't think it's quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I'm dying to kick webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven't been able to locate any type of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
Thanks for the information.
________________________________
DISCLAIMER:
This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and delete the original message.
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock<https://twitter.com/#%21/dead_lock>
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>
________________________________
To preserve the environment, please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.
RE: project status
Posted by Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>.
I created bug reports and feature suggestions for several of the things I experienced. You can view my reports on the Jira site, username is Jeff clay or jeffclay or something like that. Lol none of them have been responded to or resolved.
From: seba.wagner@gmail.com [mailto:seba.wagner@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:06 PM
To: openmeetings-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: project status
Hi Jeff,
which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?
There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
@Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think there is a need for making that more detailed?
2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>>
I've messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don't think it's quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I'm dying to kick webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven't been able to locate any type of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out of incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
Thanks for the information.
________________________________
DISCLAIMER:
This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and delete the original message.
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock<https://twitter.com/#%21/dead_lock>
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com<ma...@gmail.com>
Re: project status
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jeff,
which version are you actually using and what issues did you face?
There is also another Thread about features for version 2.1.
http://markmail.org/message/b2scofisgabwnrvx
@Maxim, I think you pretty much told what the Roadmap is. Or do you think
there is a need for making that more detailed?
2013/1/25 Jeff Clay <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>
> I’ve messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don’t
> think it’s quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I’m dying to
> kick webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven’t been able to locate any
> type of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out
> of incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for
> the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are
> not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information
> contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received
> this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and
> delete the original message.
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: project status
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
The vote for making OM Apache top level project has been passed and was
positive. We are currently working on 2.1 release. And I hope we will going
to release more often. Afaik there is no roadmap so far. The next release
planned going to be 3.0 and it should be HTML5 (mainly).
On Jan 25, 2013 10:38 AM, "Jeff Clay" <Je...@infotech-enterprises.com>
wrote:
> I’ve messed around with openmeetings quite a bit, but I still don’t
> think it’s quite stable enough to use in my environment; which I’m dying to
> kick webex and at&t connect to the curb. I haven’t been able to locate any
> type of road map online. Is there a rough guideline on when OM will be out
> of incubator status and begin to follow regular releases, etc.?
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This email may contain confidential information and is intended only for
> the use of the specific individual(s) to which it is addressed. If you are
> not the intended recipient of this email, you are hereby notified that any
> unauthorized use, dissemination or copying of this email or the information
> contained in it or attached to it is strictly prohibited. If you received
> this message in error, please immediately notify the sender at Infotech and
> delete the original message.
>