You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@polygene.apache.org by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> on 2015/07/06 10:12:43 UTC
Project Name
Gang,
Since we have decided to run with Apache Zest (instead of Apache Qi4j),
shouldn't we commit to that name full on. I.e. Qi4j is named "Apache Zest"
for common talk, and "Apache Zest Java Edition" if Qi4CS (then Apache Zest
C# Edition, or CLR Edition) joins us and where there is a difference
between the two.
If we think this is how we should move forward, I want to start modifying
all the documentation to this effect.
WDYAT?
Cheers
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
Re: Project Name
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
But, on second thought, that would bring up the issue about Java package
names...
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
>
> I think we should do it before. That sends a clearer message to people who
> isn't heavily involved.
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Paul Merlin <pa...@nosphere.org> wrote:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
>> > Gang,
>> >
>> > Since we have decided to run with Apache Zest (instead of Apache Qi4j),
>> > shouldn't we commit to that name full on. I.e. Qi4j is named "Apache
>> Zest"
>> > for common talk, and "Apache Zest Java Edition" if Qi4CS (then Apache
>> Zest
>> > C# Edition, or CLR Edition) joins us and where there is a difference
>> > between the two.
>> >
>> > If we think this is how we should move forward, I want to start
>> modifying
>> > all the documentation to this effect.
>> >
>> > WDYAT?
>> This makes sense to me and I think it will make much more sense to any
>> newcomer.
>>
>> So, this is a +1 from me.
>>
>> We're almost good WRT releasing 2.1 under the org.qi4j groupId/package
>> (see ZEST-24).
>> Shall we rename/rebrand before or after 2.1?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> /Paul
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
Re: Project Name
Posted by Sandro Martini <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
+1 even from me for the name on Java and .Net versions, and for
current and update on package names for next major release.
Both things could help clarify things to newcomers.
Bye,
Sandro
Re: Project Name
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
I am Ok with that...
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Paul Merlin <pa...@nosphere.org> wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
> > I think we should do it before. That sends a clearer message to people
> who
> > isn't heavily involved.
> > But, on second thought, that would bring up the issue about Java package
> > names...
>
> So, could we rename everything BUT java packages for 2.1?
> Then, what if we explain this in the release notes and in the
> documentation?
>
> Something along the lines of:
>
> "Apache Zest Java Edition 2.1 is the first release of the Qi4j codebase
> under the Apache Software Foundation umbrella. To keep backward
> compatiblity, this version still use org.qi4j.* java packages. Please
> note that this will change in 3.0."
>
>
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
Re: Project Name
Posted by Paul Merlin <pa...@nosphere.org>.
Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
> I think we should do it before. That sends a clearer message to people who
> isn't heavily involved.
> But, on second thought, that would bring up the issue about Java package
> names...
So, could we rename everything BUT java packages for 2.1?
Then, what if we explain this in the release notes and in the documentation?
Something along the lines of:
"Apache Zest Java Edition 2.1 is the first release of the Qi4j codebase
under the Apache Software Foundation umbrella. To keep backward
compatiblity, this version still use org.qi4j.* java packages. Please
note that this will change in 3.0."
Re: Project Name
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
I think we should do it before. That sends a clearer message to people who
isn't heavily involved.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Paul Merlin <pa...@nosphere.org> wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
> > Gang,
> >
> > Since we have decided to run with Apache Zest (instead of Apache Qi4j),
> > shouldn't we commit to that name full on. I.e. Qi4j is named "Apache
> Zest"
> > for common talk, and "Apache Zest Java Edition" if Qi4CS (then Apache
> Zest
> > C# Edition, or CLR Edition) joins us and where there is a difference
> > between the two.
> >
> > If we think this is how we should move forward, I want to start modifying
> > all the documentation to this effect.
> >
> > WDYAT?
> This makes sense to me and I think it will make much more sense to any
> newcomer.
>
> So, this is a +1 from me.
>
> We're almost good WRT releasing 2.1 under the org.qi4j groupId/package
> (see ZEST-24).
> Shall we rename/rebrand before or after 2.1?
>
> Cheers
>
> /Paul
>
>
--
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
Re: Project Name
Posted by Paul Merlin <pa...@nosphere.org>.
Hey,
Niclas Hedhman a écrit :
> Gang,
>
> Since we have decided to run with Apache Zest (instead of Apache Qi4j),
> shouldn't we commit to that name full on. I.e. Qi4j is named "Apache Zest"
> for common talk, and "Apache Zest Java Edition" if Qi4CS (then Apache Zest
> C# Edition, or CLR Edition) joins us and where there is a difference
> between the two.
>
> If we think this is how we should move forward, I want to start modifying
> all the documentation to this effect.
>
> WDYAT?
This makes sense to me and I think it will make much more sense to any
newcomer.
So, this is a +1 from me.
We're almost good WRT releasing 2.1 under the org.qi4j groupId/package
(see ZEST-24).
Shall we rename/rebrand before or after 2.1?
Cheers
/Paul